Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

A member of another watch forum has a Panerai Radiomir for sale. Apparently the RRP of this watch is £3,250 and he wants around £1,000 less than this for the watch.

 

It's a nice looking watch - I have no interest in Panerai and know very little about them - but something struck a chord about the movement, so I checked it out. Sure enough, it's an ETA 6497-2, a fairly standard, good quality, Swiss (ex-pocket watch) movement. Now, I bought my Hamilton Khaki Mechanical Field Officer's Watch, second-hand, for £200. It's a very nice watch - and the movement inside it is... an ETA 6497-2, identical to that in the Panerai.

 

Panerai actually call it calibre "OP II - base movement ETA 6497-2", but I can't see much difference in the Panerai and the Hamilton, and the Chinese 6497-2 I bought for my "Hong Kong Custom" cost me about £40!

 

So - is the price difference between Panerai and Hamilton all in the design, the case, the strap - the name? Or just one more example of where a name in the watch world bumps up the price?

Edited by WillFly
Posted

They apparently get the movements in and tweak them in some way.

The rest of the cost goes into what you mentioned above.

Me, I will be getting either a Getat or Manbushijie Homage version. About £100 :-)

Posted

There is a great deal of hype concerning watches with prices ranging from almost £500,000 for a Patek Phillipe minute repeater with tourbillon, yes a masterpiece but is it worth that sort of money?  I have just bought the watch pictured off the Bay for £9.96p and with free postage,  I know it's probably Chinese but what I'm interested in is value for money.  It really is up to the buyer to decide what they want to spend their money on and as long as they are happy who cares,  me , I still want value for money.

post-37-0-17252400-1415388664_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

I'd say the cost of the Panerai is mostly in the name. I'm not a fan of the looks of Panerai watches. From both an aesthetic and economic point of view, if I had that kind of money to spend on a watch, I wouldn't buy a Panerai. I'd really like a Hamilton Khaki though.

Posted

Unfortunately the name means everything when it comes to price.

I am currently collecting watches at an affordable prices that have quality movements found in big name watches. This lets me work on quality movements that I would otherwise have second thoughts about tackling.

Posted

I hate Panerai watches. 

 

They make tweaks to some movements that make it impossible for an indy watch repairer to work on them.

 

I never take them on for repair any more.

Posted

Panerai also had a fairly big scandal a few years back. They offered Boutique models specific to the location of the boutique, Like New York, London, etc. called the Model 318(?).

The scandal was that the model that they were selling for $5000US actually had the lowest grade ETA 6497 movement inside. No decoration, no adjustments- nothing special about it at all. I can actually buy this movement brand new for $150.  They ended up offering to replace these movements with higher grade movements "IF" anyone requested them to do so, but only did so after a huge amount of negative press. 

Posted

Its like a lot of things in life:

1. Do you want it?

2. Can you afford it?

Often those who answer yes to both questions also like the term 'reassuringly expensive', no matter how bad the item actually is.

Posted

They make tweaks to some movements that make it impossible for an indy watch repairer to work on them.

That's interesting, what sort of tweaks are you talking about? I didn't think there was much you wouldn't tackle.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is a method described in the watch repair book of Mark W. Wiles. Don‘t hammer, just tap very gently!
    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
×
×
  • Create New...