Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Like most of us, I look for perfection and oiling cap jewels with a regular oiler take a lot of practice and patience. I found myself having to reclean and re-oil over and over before I could approve my work. So, I decided to invest in an automatic oiler for this purpose and although very expensive I think it was worth every penny, and I was so happy about it that I decided to make a video about it. Please bear with me though as this was my very first attempt at video editing.

 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Posted

The 1A is great, makes cap jewel oiling a breeze and those fiddly Seiko train jewels which you're guaranteed to fit first attempt when dry but push out of place so you have to clean and re oil several times when you try to oil before placing.

May I make a recommendation which comes from having much practise with spilling things over the years doing this and model kit making.

Keep a lump of blu tack handy and place a blob on the bottom of any bottle you're decanting liquid from, until the cap is back on firmly.

9010 is very expensive to accidentally swipe across your desk. :)

  • Like 4
Posted

Thanks I have often thought about the automatic oiler and it was good to see it demonstrated like that.

  • Like 1
Posted
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6
On 6/5/2019 at 1:12 PM, m1ks said:

The 1A is great, makes cap jewel oiling a breeze and those fiddly Seiko train jewels which you're guaranteed to fit first attempt when dry but push out of place so you have to clean and re oil several times when you try to oil before placing.

May I make a recommendation which comes from having much practise with spilling things over the years doing this and model kit making.

Keep a lump of blu tack handy and place a blob on the bottom of any bottle you're decanting liquid from, until the cap is back on firmly.

9010 is very expensive to accidentally swipe across your desk. :)

Excellent advice, thank you! It's those little things that sometimes make all the difference!

Indeed, and I was actually feeling a bit worried while recording the video...:unsure:

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

I do it the opposite way. It didn’t work for me pushing the button up first, I was getting oil around the chaton jewel rather than on the end stone. Strange, I can see it in the video it works for you to push the button up first, I must be doing something slightly differently.

I follow the instructions:
I insert the needle into the jewel hole (the needle will retract slightly when it touches the end stone)
Then I push the button up until it touches the eccentric screw, then I release the button to it’s resting position and finally take the oiler out.
This method worked perfectly every time. Although I only just got it so I will play around with it.

The instructions aren’t great. I keep the gasket on and push it up to hold the button up when not in use and the oiler is in its stand. I think that’s what they want me to do.

Posted
2 hours ago, PeterS said:

I do it the opposite way. It didn’t work for me pushing the button up first, I was getting oil around the chaton jewel rather than on the end stone. Strange, I can see it in the video it works for you to push the button up first, I must be doing something slightly differently.

I follow the instructions:
I insert the needle into the jewel hole (the needle will retract slightly when it touches the end stone)
Then I push the button up until it touches the eccentric screw, then I release the button to it’s resting position and finally take the oiler out.
This method worked perfectly every time. Although I only just got it so I will play around with it.

The instructions aren’t great. I keep the gasket on and push it up to hold the button up when not in use and the oiler is in its stand. I think that’s what they want me to do.

I would think it more likely to damage or break the needle doing it that way.

Posted

Interesting tip in the book called Maintaining & Repairing Mechanical Watches A Practical Guide by Mark W Wiles.

So it seems the method VWatchie uses is correct.

Page 148

IMGP0003.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I have the book still opened on that page on my desk! Yes I did read it and this method was the first method I tried but I couldn’t do it, the oil always ended up around the chaton jewel.
M. Wiles uses Bergeon 2718 and the new ones are 7718, I don’t know whether there are any differences except the stand.

This is from Bergeon:

 

20190728_154853 (Copy).jpg

Posted

I had another go and it works just fine.
Maybe I didn’t have the oiler straight and the needle was hitting the chaton or the chaton jewel.
Both methods work well. The pic with one hole in the rodico is push the button first, and the pic with two holes in the rodico is the needle in first method.

 

20190728_171228 (Copy).jpg

20190728_173112 (Copy).jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

@PeterS  isn,t that too much oil?   

Yes it is. It's in my spares, I was using it for testing the two methods, it's not going to be installed anywhere, otherwise I would have put around 30% there

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is a method described in the watch repair book of Mark W. Wiles. Don‘t hammer, just tap very gently!
    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
×
×
  • Create New...