Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Guys I am having trouble with a Smiths 27-CS movement.

 

I have serviced it and had to do some work on the hairspring. That is now a nice shape, flat and round ;)

Trouble I am having is that as soon as I engage the balance shock retention spring it either slows to a crawl or usually just stops.

 

I have had a good look at the jewels and there are no cracks or wear. I can's see any noticable bend in either pivots and the watch runs absolutely fine unitl I engage the retention spring.

The only thing I can think of at the moment is a bent pivot that I can's pick up on with the eye. The jewels are not wobbling before I engage the spring.

 

Or, somehow the top of the pivot it making contact with the cap jewel?

 

Any tips or tests I can do to work towards a solution?

Posted

I don't know much but maybe the cap jewel is upside down? You know, one side, the one that goes towards the pivot is flat and the other one is rounded...just my 2 cents.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Posted

If it was running OK before the service then Bob is probably correct. If not then something has been bent either the pivot or the balance bridge. As a test try a little piece of packing under the bridge before reassembly. If it shows improvement then is highly likely that it is the bridge has been bent.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for the replies guys.

The cap jewels were definitely in the right way around.

With the cap jewels removed I put some pressure on the jewel bearing and it didn't effect the running of the watch so the pivot had to be hitting the cap jewel.

 

This was a watch I purchased when I had only just started Horology Training and it came with a shock jewel missing "a easy fix" as it was sold to me (I can hear the chuckling!)

So I sourced a replacement shock jewel assembly and put it in and the watch started ticking...but not for long. It had very poor amplitude.

I put it in the cupboard and forgot about it.

 

Fast forward a year or so, got it out, sorted out the poor shape of the hairspring, serviced it and was left with this problem.

 

Thank you clockboy, I cut a thin piece of plastic and put it under the balance cock and voila, it's running a treat now. On a stop watch it has gained 5 seconds over the last 3 hours without any regulation and that's on the wrist.

I will take it into class tomorrow and put it on the timegraph.

 

Conclusion, either I sourced the wrong size shock jewels or as clockboy says "the balance cock is bent"

 

It's one of my personal watches so it can stay bodged for now ;)

 

Cheers guys.

IMG_2074.jpg

 

Posted

I did indeed, the only thing I haven't oiled yet is the pallets. I have some 941 in class for that.

Dial up all night it is about 45 seconds fast.

 

Happy days :)

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well I spoke too soon. Here's where I am now with this issue. I replaced the date jumper and all seemed to function correctly. Fully wound and only in the movement holder, no dial or hands, I let it sit untouched for two days. Both nights it advanced the date. The second night it might have been just shy of fully advanced. Seemed as though I fixed it, so I reassembled the watch. Three nights in a row the date did not advance. Once I pull the crown it does. So you might think that it's the dial interfering, but here's the weird thing. If I advance the date during the day to 11:57p and watch it get to 12:00:30a the date flips with gusto. So here's what I'm thinking and could use your council. I installed a new Swiss mainspring. I used Moebius 8217 braking grease on the barrel walls. It seems to wind quite a bit before slipping, but does slip.  I've read that the 7750 really needs Kluber p125 as a braking grease.  Do you think it just doesn't have enough power after a few to several hours of sitting before the date change? Here are the TG numbers after service:  Rate +1s/d,    Amp 301,    BE 0.0ms   
    • I've managed with the ones I have but 1.8 mm would be better. 
    • Parts weren’t readily interchangeable when this watch was made, and almost every part was adjusted by hand to fit the rest of the parts in that specific watch. That said, it can save time to harvest a part from a donor movement so you can modify it to fit a similar movement, rather than try to make the part from scratch.  With that in mind, it is possible that the click from this watch was removed for use in another watch. I doubt that the other missing parts were taken for use as donor parts. The cannon pinion would be removed properly, rather than snapping it off with the centre wheel arbour and pin inside it.  The Maltese cross stop works were probably removed by a lazy or less knowledgeable watchmaker servicing the watch.  It is very common to encounter otherwise functional watches (including very high end pieces) that are missing their stop work because a previous watchmaker didn’t know how to set it up when reassembling the movement, or was too lazy to bother and knew that the customer would probably never notice.  It is possible that the stop work parts were taken to be fitted to a watch that was missing them.  Best Regards, Mark
    • I posted a link to another video where he takes it a step further and uses the pins to set and adjust rate as well as positional error.  Alex doesn’t manipulate the stud angle after he pushes it in but I find it makes a difference in the spring concentricity and bend.  Amex also doesn’t use the pin manipulation to adjust positional discrepancies.   
    • Brilliant! Very commendable! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...