Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been doing some work on my watch website pages - and added a page of movement pictures with captions. Click on a pic to see it large size. Note that the captions give, in most cases, the movement name and calibre - not necessarily the make of the watch!

 

Most of the movements have calibres - some dont, and, if you recognise the make and calibre, do let me know so that I can give more accurate information.

 

Will

 

http://www.willswatchpages.com/movements.html

Posted

Thanks Denis - appreciated. Oddly enough, it also bears a slight resemblance to my Pierce 103, but the Lip provenance is more accurate.

 

For a cheap-as-chips watch, the movement is remarkably good - double-screwed crown wheel and Breguet overcoil!

Posted

I love it too Will, very nice job and excellent idea. Maybe I would add a .pdf file of the service data as a downloadable option to each if available. That would make it like a repository!

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi Bob,

 

looking at your George Stockwell, it looks a lot like the Rebberg movements used in early Rolexes. the finishing on the plates, the shape of the stud holder on the balance cock.

 

Do a search for 'rebberg watch' in Google images.. don't be focussed on the shape of the bridges, instead look at the placement of pivots, relative to the other stuff, ie ratchet wheel, stem.

 

unfortunately not too much info exists on Rebberg movements on the net..

 

Anil

  • Like 1
Posted

Anil - many thanks for a really informative reply - spot on! I've located a picture of the same movement - engraved Rolex - and I'll change my records accordingly.

Posted

Will,

 

That Ralco looks very much like an AS1187.

The Thomas Russell I'm not so sure about but it has the look of a Revue (GT) movement. The shape of the click and the balance cock, and the general layout is very reminiscent of the Revue pocket watch movements. 

Posted

Hi Marc - the Ralco is indeed an AS 1187 - thanks!

 

The Thomas Russell is more problematical - just 9 jewels and some similarities to the Revue models - but not quite, as far as I can see. The searches continue.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well I spoke too soon. Here's where I am now with this issue. I replaced the date jumper and all seemed to function correctly. Fully wound and only in the movement holder, no dial or hands, I let it sit untouched for two days. Both nights it advanced the date. The second night it might have been just shy of fully advanced. Seemed as though I fixed it, so I reassembled the watch. Three nights in a row the date did not advance. Once I pull the crown it does. So you might think that it's the dial interfering, but here's the weird thing. If I advance the date during the day to 11:57p and watch it get to 12:00:30a the date flips with gusto. So here's what I'm thinking and could use your council. I installed a new Swiss mainspring. I used Moebius 8217 braking grease on the barrel walls. It seems to wind quite a bit before slipping, but does slip.  I've read that the 7750 really needs Kluber p125 as a braking grease.  Do you think it just doesn't have enough power after a few to several hours of sitting before the date change? Here are the TG numbers after service:  Rate +1s/d,    Amp 301,    BE 0.0ms   
    • I've managed with the ones I have but 1.8 mm would be better. 
    • Parts weren’t readily interchangeable when this watch was made, and almost every part was adjusted by hand to fit the rest of the parts in that specific watch. That said, it can save time to harvest a part from a donor movement so you can modify it to fit a similar movement, rather than try to make the part from scratch.  With that in mind, it is possible that the click from this watch was removed for use in another watch. I doubt that the other missing parts were taken for use as donor parts. The cannon pinion would be removed properly, rather than snapping it off with the centre wheel arbour and pin inside it.  The Maltese cross stop works were probably removed by a lazy or less knowledgeable watchmaker servicing the watch.  It is very common to encounter otherwise functional watches (including very high end pieces) that are missing their stop work because a previous watchmaker didn’t know how to set it up when reassembling the movement, or was too lazy to bother and knew that the customer would probably never notice.  It is possible that the stop work parts were taken to be fitted to a watch that was missing them.  Best Regards, Mark
    • I posted a link to another video where he takes it a step further and uses the pins to set and adjust rate as well as positional error.  Alex doesn’t manipulate the stud angle after he pushes it in but I find it makes a difference in the spring concentricity and bend.  Amex also doesn’t use the pin manipulation to adjust positional discrepancies.   
    • Brilliant! Very commendable! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...