Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just wonderd what your views were on this?

 

For anyone not knowing, ETA announced a while back they are stopping the sale of all spare parts on December 31st 2015. After this date only Authorised service centres will b able to get them, so once cousins, boley etc supplies have been exhausted we will no longer be able to get them, meaning the customer has to pay extortiate prices.

 

What do you think?

Posted

Suppliers have been told they are not allowed to change ordering patterns, well at least that's what the letter from ETA to cousins said. It said they must continue to order supplies as normal, any abnormalities with quantities will not be fulfilled.

Posted

It's a piece of $h!t, the price of second hand movement will also take a hike in price. As Lawson posted earlier, the Japanese manufactures should benefit from it.

Posted

It's a piece of $h!t, the price of second hand movement will also take a hike in price. As Lawson posted earlier, the Japanese manufactures should benefit from it.

 

I only really restore vintage so always had this problem, everyone in this field is going to feel it :(

Posted

....and that's why I tend to stick to old Seiko's but then again I only do this for the fun? of it. The really sad part of it is there are some really good pro's out there who are going to get truly shafted but this outrageous behaviour.

  • Like 2
Posted

....and that's why I tend to stick to old Seiko's but then again I only do this for the fun? of it. The really sad part of it is there are some really good pro's out there who are going to get truly shafted but this outrageous behaviour.

Time.to.speed up 3d printing tech!/

I'm sure generic parts will be available.

Posted

Time.to.speed up 3d printing tech!/

I got out of 2D printing about 6 years ago 'cause of the aggro. 3D printing = triple aggro.

Posted

I got out of 2D printing about 6 years ago 'cause of the aggro. 3D printing = triple aggro.

 

but so much cooler   :D

Posted

The only glimmer of hope is the BHI are in talks with the swiss guys. Therefore a slim chance of a change of policy by Swatch but in my opinion very slim.

The biggest worry for us guys is Swatch also own the companies that make jewels, springs, batteries & lots more.  :thumbsd:

Posted

Well the fight is still on for what it's worth. I would encourage all board members to contact their local elected leaders about this.

 

I know it is now on my priority list to write to John Hayes (my MP), he was very happy when I fixed up his Omega for him a few years ago so I am sure he will be interested to know that in the future he may be forced to send it to Omega and pay upwards of £600 for servicing. 

 

It's simple - take away consumer choice = corporate monopoly = illegal

 

The car industry tried it and failed, why should the watch industry get away with it!

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I will in time write to Vince Cable (trade & Industry sec) but I suspect there is little he can do. 

In my opinion the only way to progress forward & I have written this before in the BHI journal, the achilles heel of the multi national organisations is bad publicity. I have not written any letters yet in case it scuppers the present talks between BHI & the Swiss. I suspect if anything does come out of the talks it will be in future you will need accreditations of some sort to purchase, either a certain criteria of equipment or exam pass.

 

If nothing positive comes out of the talks then everyone needs to email too.....

[email protected]

Edited by clockboy
Posted

If attempts to swerve Swatch off course fail, then the people who will fill the gap are:

 

  • s/h movement sellers on eBay
  • the Japanese watch industry
  • the Chinese watch industry
  • other manufacturers who develop their own movements independently of Swatch, such as Christopher Ward
Posted
Paul78, on 09 Jan 2015 - 04:23 AM, said:

Suppliers have been told they are not allowed to change ordering patterns, well at least that's what the letter from ETA to cousins said. It said they must continue to order supplies as normal, any abnormalities with quantities will not be fulfilled.

 

Hi Paul,

 

Hording parts is not the answer.  Swatch simply have to made a VERY minor design change, and the parts, for say, an 2824 will not fit the new 2824-xx.  And with CNC technology these days they can do that type of re-design quickly.

 

The answer is inform and educate your friends and clients that Swiss based movements will be money pits to service in the future.  Explain the quality and advantages of buying a high-end Japanese movement: like a Grand Seiko.  And I truly hope the Japs take full advantage of this and start a huge marketing campaign, train independents on their movements, and make spare parts easy and affordable to obtain.  Can you imagine what would happen to Swatch if they did that? :huh:

 

Like I said in a previous post: "For the Swiss Houses to say that only their watchmakers are qualified and skilled enough to repair and service their movement is complete affectation."  Swatch are doing this out of greed, pure and simple, so the only way to punish those who lust for money is to remove it from them.  And keep it removed until the Swatch Group dies, and the Swiss re-learn an old lesson they seem to have forgotten, and we don't have one corporation controlling the entire future of watchmaking.

 

Lawson hops down from his soapbox :)

Posted

 

  • other manufacturers who develop their own movements independently of Swatch, such as Christopher Ward

 

 

The rebirth of independent watchmaking. Exciting times ahead :)

Posted (edited)

I agree and have said it before, lets hope this is the kickstart the industry needs in the Uk for the future.......with the advancement of CNC machine tools and design, bar the springs and jewels one machinetool is capable of machining all the parts required to produce a watch. A have look at Citizenmachinery.co.uk. £100k and a decent apprentice trained programmer will get anyone started!!..

Edited by ash145
Posted

Hi Paul,

Hording parts is not the answer. Swatch simply have to made a VERY minor design change, and the parts, for say, an 2824 will not fit the new 2824-xx. And with CNC technology these days they can do that type of re-design quickly.

The answer is inform and educate your friends and clients that Swiss based movements will be money pits to service in the future. Explain the quality and advantages of buying a high-end Japanese movement: like a Grand Seiko. And I truly hope the Japs take full advantage of this and start a huge marketing campaign, train independents on their movements, and make spare parts easy and affordable to obtain. Can you imagine what would happen to Swatch if they did that? :huh:

Like I said in a previous post: "For the Swiss Houses to say that only their watchmakers are qualified and skilled enough to repair and service their movement is complete affectation." Swatch are doing this out of greed, pure and simple, so the only way to punish those who lust for money is to remove it from them. And keep it removed until the Swatch Group dies, and the Swiss re-learn an old lesson they seem to have forgotten, and we don't have one corporation controlling the entire future of watchmaking.

Lawson hops down from his soapbox :)

Hi Lawson, very well said!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well I spoke too soon. Here's where I am now with this issue. I replaced the date jumper and all seemed to function correctly. Fully wound and only in the movement holder, no dial or hands, I let it sit untouched for two days. Both nights it advanced the date. The second night it might have been just shy of fully advanced. Seemed as though I fixed it, so I reassembled the watch. Three nights in a row the date did not advance. Once I pull the crown it does. So you might think that it's the dial interfering, but here's the weird thing. If I advance the date during the day to 11:57p and watch it get to 12:00:30a the date flips with gusto. So here's what I'm thinking and could use your council. I installed a new Swiss mainspring. I used Moebius 8217 braking grease on the barrel walls. It seems to wind quite a bit before slipping, but does slip.  I've read that the 7750 really needs Kluber p125 as a braking grease.  Do you think it just doesn't have enough power after a few to several hours of sitting before the date change? Here are the TG numbers after service:  Rate +1s/d,    Amp 301,    BE 0.0ms   
    • I've managed with the ones I have but 1.8 mm would be better. 
    • Parts weren’t readily interchangeable when this watch was made, and almost every part was adjusted by hand to fit the rest of the parts in that specific watch. That said, it can save time to harvest a part from a donor movement so you can modify it to fit a similar movement, rather than try to make the part from scratch.  With that in mind, it is possible that the click from this watch was removed for use in another watch. I doubt that the other missing parts were taken for use as donor parts. The cannon pinion would be removed properly, rather than snapping it off with the centre wheel arbour and pin inside it.  The Maltese cross stop works were probably removed by a lazy or less knowledgeable watchmaker servicing the watch.  It is very common to encounter otherwise functional watches (including very high end pieces) that are missing their stop work because a previous watchmaker didn’t know how to set it up when reassembling the movement, or was too lazy to bother and knew that the customer would probably never notice.  It is possible that the stop work parts were taken to be fitted to a watch that was missing them.  Best Regards, Mark
    • I posted a link to another video where he takes it a step further and uses the pins to set and adjust rate as well as positional error.  Alex doesn’t manipulate the stud angle after he pushes it in but I find it makes a difference in the spring concentricity and bend.  Amex also doesn’t use the pin manipulation to adjust positional discrepancies.   
    • Brilliant! Very commendable! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...