Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Last night I was finally successful in hand winding a mainspring into a barrel. I thought the tough part was over...until I tried to insert the arbor into the spring. I tried several different approaches and could not get the arbor to fit inside the inner coil. Then disaster struck and the barrel went one direction and the arbor another, into the void.

Any tips for getting the arbor into the mainspring?

Posted

Hi Don,

I usually use tweezers to hold the arbour by the square and gently press it into the centre coil of the spring while turning the arbour against the direction of the coil. If you have a pin chuck yo could use this instead of using tweezers, it may give you better control. Do this with the barrel resting on a plate or anvil with a hole in it to allow the other end of the arbour to enter when it protrudes through the barrel wall as it is fitted. Then place the cover on and snap it in place.

Posted

Hi Don,

 

To add to what Geo said,

 

Flatten a piece of Rodico onto your workbench. Using the handle of your oiler make a divot in it. Then fix the barrel/spring into the rodico (so that it doesn't move) with the end of the inner coil nearest to you and the hole in the midle over the divot you made. Oil the inner part of the barrel where the arbor will contact. Next hold the arbor with your tweezers and get the edge furthest from you into the coil. Using a needle/oiler work the coil around the arbor while applying downward pressure on it with the tweezers. The end of the arbor will sit in the divot.

If the replacement spring is correctly sized to the arbor you don't really need the oiler but in most cases I find the inner coil of the spring is slightly undersized.

 

 

There's actually a tool for this... 'google barrel arbor holder'. Pin vise works but its jaws may leave marks on a bearing surface.

 

And to top it off... theres also a tool to close the barrel lid ...... sheer luxury!

 

bonus tip... for the arbor to fly off you must have been holding the arbor tightly... whenever you do so, curl your free hand around the movement so that it is oppositeyour tweezers. Something you have to consciously do in the beginning but once you make a habit of it you'll find youself spending less time with your nose to your workroom floor.

 

Anil

Posted

I have found some are tight especially if it is a new spring. I attach the abour in a pin vice and then put it in at a slight angle engaging the hole first then tilting in straight.

  • Like 2
Posted

Thanks for the advice, guys. I have a couple of pin vises, so I'll try those. Anil, the Rodico idea is perfect, as I don't have a staking/riveting block. But I do have a barrel closer, when I get to that point.

Posted

Well, I had another go at it today, with a different movement and it worked! Thanks again for the tips. Got to use my barrel closer too. [emoji3]

  • Like 1
Posted

I was wondering, off hand, do any one knows what "barrel arbor holder" sizes are most common? Thank you in advance.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Bob,

Reviving an old thread to ask if you ever worked out an answer to your question? I got a bunch of pin vices lately, and mixed in was a barrel arbor holder. I've used it and it was great, so much easier with it. I now want to get some more, but they cost a lot. I'm just wondering which are the most useful.

Posted

Hi chadders,

 

nope, I haven't gotten the answer yet but hope and patience is the last thing a watchmaker loses! :)  I was just thinking, maybe the one you have is the answer to this question, since you already found uses for it. May I ask what size it is? In my mind, I'm willing to start with one like yours and work my way into the other ones as need arises...right now I haven't venture into the expense fearing I make the wrong choice.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Posted

It's quite tricky to measure. I think it closes to 0.5mm, but unlike others I've seen the closure is not circular but oval. This means it can actually hold arbors up to about 1.5mm without marking. However I don't think it would be as secure as the ones with a circular grip. Hope that makes sense.

Posted

Thanks, I'll check on the different ones offered by...you guessed, Bergeon. Then I'll try the closest one. I got a couple of ETA movements and Seikos I will try it first (just to see how they "grab") and get back to you with a report.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I doubt it is due to lack of amplitude.  My 7750 - which I haven't serviced yet because the numbers were OK (and I am still scared of chronographs!)- has no problem flipping the date with an amplitude closer to 250º On other movements I have had issues where the plate(s) that go over the calendar wheel interfere.  I did an FHF ST 96-4 last week where there are 2 tiny plates plus a larger plate that hold the calendar wheel in place and I had real problems getting the calendar wheel to snap around nicely.  Lubrication on the points of the teeth of the calendar wheel and making sure the small plates were aligned properly was the solution there.
    • Well I spoke too soon. Here's where I am now with this issue. I replaced the date jumper and all seemed to function correctly. Fully wound and only in the movement holder, no dial or hands, I let it sit untouched for two days. Both nights it advanced the date. The second night it might have been just shy of fully advanced. Seemed as though I fixed it, so I reassembled the watch. Three nights in a row the date did not advance. Once I pull the crown it does. So you might think that it's the dial interfering, but here's the weird thing. If I advance the date during the day to 11:57p and watch it get to 12:00:30a the date flips with gusto. So here's what I'm thinking and could use your council. I installed a new Swiss mainspring. I used Moebius 8217 braking grease on the barrel walls. It seems to wind quite a bit before slipping, but does slip.  I've read that the 7750 really needs Kluber p125 as a braking grease.  Do you think it just doesn't have enough power after a few to several hours of sitting before the date change? Here are the TG numbers after service:  Rate +1s/d,    Amp 301,    BE 0.0ms   
    • I've managed with the ones I have but 1.8 mm would be better. 
    • Parts weren’t readily interchangeable when this watch was made, and almost every part was adjusted by hand to fit the rest of the parts in that specific watch. That said, it can save time to harvest a part from a donor movement so you can modify it to fit a similar movement, rather than try to make the part from scratch.  With that in mind, it is possible that the click from this watch was removed for use in another watch. I doubt that the other missing parts were taken for use as donor parts. The cannon pinion would be removed properly, rather than snapping it off with the centre wheel arbour and pin inside it.  The Maltese cross stop works were probably removed by a lazy or less knowledgeable watchmaker servicing the watch.  It is very common to encounter otherwise functional watches (including very high end pieces) that are missing their stop work because a previous watchmaker didn’t know how to set it up when reassembling the movement, or was too lazy to bother and knew that the customer would probably never notice.  It is possible that the stop work parts were taken to be fitted to a watch that was missing them.  Best Regards, Mark
    • I posted a link to another video where he takes it a step further and uses the pins to set and adjust rate as well as positional error.  Alex doesn’t manipulate the stud angle after he pushes it in but I find it makes a difference in the spring concentricity and bend.  Amex also doesn’t use the pin manipulation to adjust positional discrepancies.   
×
×
  • Create New...