Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guys, could you look at the photos and see if by your experience this pallet comes apart? I need to drill it to fit a new pivot as one has snapped. 
The smallest collet i have is 1.4 mm so I might need to put it in my larger lathe with a 3 jaw chuck and a dedicated drill tail stick to drill and fit the new pivot. 
Really annoyed as the movement was going when I realised that I put the ratchet wheel on the wrong way round, proceeded to strip the movement happy that it was going and somehow, don’t know how the pivot got snapped on the pallet so a bit miffed now as I know I don’t have one of these in the spares box!!!

cheers for any help

ED40E1F8-CDF4-4796-BBA0-A062E3B1928B.jpeg

D2D0EF0F-45AD-455A-BE42-20A68FBD47FE.jpeg

C89DAF57-37A4-42CD-8869-9C26FE3809D3.jpeg

B2C8510E-76C9-4089-97D8-1B6659314FF7.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have done this repair. The centre arbour is friction fitted. Making a new one is a reasonably simple job with a lathe. However the height clearance is critical to get it to lock correctly with the escape wheel. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers guys, luckily for the height there is a stepped part on the arbor where the pallets seat so as long as I can turn to that exactly then fingers crossed we are good to go.
I shall attempt to drill and fit a new pivot first, hopefully tomorrow, I will post pictures of progress.
wish me luck!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible, but not easy. According my experience you will need about the same time for drilling or making a new staff on the lathe.
Frank

I would make a new staff using the old one for measuring.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I started on my larger lathe and was going fine but my 3 jaw Chuck doesn’t close enough to allow me to turn the job and do the other end, so I had to leave that one.
I then decided that I could put my drill chuck from the tail stock into the chuck as that closes enough to accept the job, had Wayne too much wobble, it just wouldn’t sit right.
turn between centres next, was going ok but took bits just too big so could get proper shoulders etc so again left that idea.
finally got my Lorch 6mm lathe our and started turning by hand, just can’t seem to get a good straight edge by hand so finished off with file, even got the pivots to fit the plates.
then disaster, I snapped a pivot whilst finishing it off with the pivot file, so I’ll start again tomorrow and see how I get on.

CD26C50B-76CA-4B17-8C65-3500F2C432E9.jpeg

FCD0668D-067B-4A41-AB9A-874F192DDC60.jpeg

06C986A7-94BD-4E95-9022-CA7163DAB9C1.jpeg

361C7D84-8415-42DD-BB7C-5A9DFAE21467.jpeg

E5C344FE-608E-47F6-B51D-CFFE3189944B.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok none of that worked very well so back to the drawing board, the problem is I’ve not got a full set up for turning between centres on my Lorch lathe, so I went ahead and cracked on  if only for practice with the gravers and sharpening them. 
What I can say is that I can turn faster by hand than I can on my Axminster engineers lathe!!

the only thing is I can’t seem to get absolutely straight edges yet, again it’s down to practice. 

So how have I got on, well I’ve had 3 attempts all with varying success but none up to the standard that is required, what I need is a few more collets of smaller sizes, my smallest is 1.4mm so i need to go under 1mm and I’ll have this arbor smashed. 
The largest diameter on this job is 0.73mm, if i can get a collet to fit that then I can turn rhe job around and finish the pivots much better.
So bearing that I’m mind when you look at the pictures these have been turned from right to left in a single collet starting with 2mm blues pivot rod.

Will start again next week after the weekend 

Open to comments, hints, tips etc etc 

EB78C158-00A9-459D-87E0-47F0BAB43582.jpeg

760C138F-9672-43B3-AD31-6A9F993DA177.jpeg

C687832E-A3D0-49E0-8725-692D00000C56.jpeg

D6376AFB-64DB-440A-AED5-87C27218178B.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok none of that worked very well so back to the drawing board, the problem is I’ve not got a full set up for turning between centres on my Lorch lathe, so I went ahead and cracked on  if only for practice with the gravers and sharpening them. 
What I can say is that I can turn faster by hand than I can on my Axminster engineers lathe!!
the only thing is I can’t seem to get absolutely straight edges yet, again it’s down to practice. 
So how have I got on, well I’ve had 3 attempts all with varying success but none up to the standard that is required, what I need is a few more collets of smaller sizes, my smallest is 1.4mm so i need to go under 1mm and I’ll have this arbor smashed. 
The largest diameter on this job is 0.73mm, if i can get a collet to fit that then I can turn rhe job around and finish the pivots much better.
So bearing that I’m mind when you look at the pictures these have been turned from right to left in a single collet starting with 2mm blues pivot rod.
Will start again next week after the weekend 
Open to comments, hints, tips etc etc 
EB78C158-00A9-459D-87E0-47F0BAB43582.thumb.jpeg.452ec92fe8214edfce36fd7c9044a4ce.jpeg
760C138F-9672-43B3-AD31-6A9F993DA177.thumb.jpeg.c3adf9b32ef2246062dbf86dc8d53186.jpeg
C687832E-A3D0-49E0-8725-692D00000C56.thumb.jpeg.fc228e01270ddb24378fe01ac2d4fbf6.jpeg
D6376AFB-64DB-440A-AED5-87C27218178B.thumb.jpeg.1542b7cfdc04bed3fa1abe2a8e0b4b7a.jpeg

First of all, file you tool rest to get a smooth flat surface, else the pivot will match the pattern of your tool rest. Second, rough cut the first level that holds the staff and use the staff to ride up the shaft that you are making until you get twice it's width from the shoulder. I have made two youtube videos on how to make a balance staff. Hear is the latest one.

Now the trick with the pivots is to use a stone to finish them off, and you need a bergeon jeweled ruler to measure until you get the right size. Then use a burnisher to finish off the pivot. Leave enough pivot to do final adjustment for size. I use a pivot lathe or a jacot tool with the lanterns to shorten the pivot. Do NOT shorten too much or you will need to start all over again. Finishing off the pivots takes the most time...and you need to be very deliberate and patient. I have had a few failures over the years, but have now figured this out. I use gravers that are carbide as well and very small. I start out with 6 mm triangular graver, the typical one, and then go to a flat 4mm mm tip and then a flat 2mm tip. The I use a 2mm rounded tip to get to cone shape on the pivot. Here is another video where I am fine tuning a balance staff pivot for an elgin. And I show the gravers I use.



Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also let me know if you need more advice. I wrote a lot more but it didn't seem to publish it. Made another video showing the gravers I use 4mm flat, 2mm flat, then 2 mm round to finish off the cone on the pivot end. Also remember to make the staff pivots a little long to size it properly once the basic pivot is finished and be for you stake on the roller table. Here is the video:


Good luck

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huge thanks for the advice, and yes well spotter with regard to my tool rest, I shall be addressing that on Monday.
Im limited on my gravers at the moment I have 4 and all are diamond shaped and differing sizes, I need a nice lozenge shaped and square shaped one for other work. But first I need to get more comfortable with turning.
Having to stay at home at the moment is good as i have spent more time working through all the watch/clock projects that I have lying around in the last week than I have in the last 6 months.
I shall watch your video’s with great interest and take away as much as I can from them.

Thanks for the words of encouragement and the extra info mate  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huge thanks for the advice, and yes well spotter with regard to my tool rest, I shall be addressing that on Monday.
Im limited on my gravers at the moment I have 4 and all are diamond shaped and differing sizes, I need a nice lozenge shaped and square shaped one for other work. But first I need to get more comfortable with turning.
Having to stay at home at the moment is good as i have spent more time working through all the watch/clock projects that I have lying around in the last week than I have in the last 6 months.
I shall watch your video’s with great interest and take away as much as I can from them.
Thanks for the words of encouragement and the extra info mate  

No problem and stay safe


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok had another go today and I’m going to wait until the other collets arrive. I managed to find 3 in France that I bought yesterday and are currently in the postage system. 
I got a good pivot on the one I did this morning but there’s no way I can do the other pivot until I can turn the job around and hold it in the smaller sized collet.
So it’s a waiting game now, so I’ve a few Balance  staffs that need changing so I’m going to get on with them for now until I can carry on with this job.

Edited by transporter
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok had another go today and I’m going to wait until the other collets arrive. I managed to find 3 in France that I bought yesterday and are currently in the postage system. 
I got a good pivot on the one I did this morning but there’s no way I can do the other pivot until I can turn the job around and hold it in the smaller sized collet.
So it’s a waiting game now, so I’ve a few Balance  staffs that need changing so I’m going to get on with them for now until I can carry on with this job.

I did another video on YouTube on the equipment needed to make balance staffs.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to suggest you turn what you can of it then turn it around and stick it in a wax (shellac) "chuck" to finish the other end.. it can also be further finished on a jacot tool with the help of a tiny Bergeon drive dog.

The Wax cheucks are just some brass in a collet, drill and heat, put some shellac in, heat a bit more and put staff in, keep warm so you can power the lathe slowly, while centering and allowing to cool - the part will hopefully be running true. People sometimes use superglue (can be disolved in acetone) rather than Shellac.. be wary of heating the spindle and headstock if using Shellac.

 

Jonathan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to suggest you turn what you can of it then turn it around and stick it in a wax (shellac) "chuck" to finish the other end.. it can also be further finished on a jacot tool with the help of a tiny Bergeon drive dog.
The Wax cheucks are just some brass in a collet, drill and heat, put some shellac in, heat a bit more and put staff in, keep warm so you can power the lathe slowly, while centering and allowing to cool - the part will hopefully be running true. People sometimes use superglue (can be disolved in acetone) rather than Shellac.. be wary of heating the spindle and headstock if using Shellac.
 
Jonathan

Old school. You can finish the complete balance staff without waxing or dogs. That is the very difficult method.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s the way I’m doing it now, although the wax chuck is an idea, although I have no shellac but do have superglue, but I’m loath to use that. What I could do though as an experiment whilst I wait for my other collets to arrive, is to use a brass bush, cut a slice in it mount that in a step collet and then mount the Half turned pallet arbor in the bush ( now looking like a hairspring collet ) and try turning the last bit that way.........
Who knows it might just work, I’ll post pictures to let you know later today

Edited by transporter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, a good graver day so far, my idea of a brass collet in a step chuck was almost a goer, but I wouldn’t be able to get close enough to the job, so I used one of my other collets and I hate to say it “superglue” to glue the reversed arbor so that I could turn the final pivot. 
It almost worked but the super glue gave out and it came out of centre and became unworkable. I SHALL STRIVE TO GET THIS DONE!!! Just need to wait I think for the new collets to arrive. 
 

 

CF530AB1-A314-4860-8DE7-4AEA9273AABB.jpeg

0BB63714-D282-4BAF-BDA6-005408D1B6BA.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok and another attempt, started doing the thicker of the two ends, pivot done and size done. Grabbed a small brass bush with 2mm outer diameter, I then got a broach and cut it out to just under the 0.77 mm diameter of the arbor, that’s now glued onto the arbor and is ready to be fitted into my 2mm collet.
Fingers crossed, if anything I’m getting more turning practice in this week than I have in the last 6 months 

B310D787-C0ED-4826-9118-7ECCE3D19B09.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/7/2020 at 12:21 AM, jdrichard said:


Old school. You can finish the complete balance staff without waxing or dogs. That is the very difficult method.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Those are traditional ways, and not the only ways, however I just quite like them from being things I learned about early from easily accessible (hand-me-down) older books.. It took a few hours from getting my first watchmakers lathe to getting to grips with my first wax chuck as a teenager, that was a fair time ago.

Probably 12-15 years ago a speaker came to a BHI meeting with his lathe and a camera or digital microscope, to show the process of making a staff in one on a projector screen. He was said to have once produced (if my memory's correct) 10 in a line, end to end. Personally, I don't feel it's really necessary (or for that matter desirable) to have to produce them in such vast quantities that saving some minutes and seconds are make or break.

I'm in two minds with the Jacot tool, sort of precision and prettiness vs fiddliness. Admittedly, not really a beginner friendly option - using one is a skill, as is finding a good used example.

The wax chuck method takes a bit of practice but is cheap and accurate.. I usually find it more easily effective with something like the smallest size of creme brulee burner/ gas soldering iron as seen in the Roger Smith hand finishing videos, for tempering the hands.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the poster,

I have tried superglue for grinding some glass to size (not a crystal) when it was too small to hold between pads. The main difficulty is getting everything as needed before it sets. With the brass in the collet, you can make the hole to be a snug fit with the part so there's a little less accuracy required in getting the part centered while the glue sets. There may be some youtube videos from people who use superglue.

My experience is with Shellac for this as it can be reheated. I've found it's handy to have a bit from time to time - it can be mixed with meths to produce french polish, vintage camera coverings are sometimes held with a thicker mix of dissolved Shellac. There's also a black shellac product for filling numbers on clock dials. It is traditionally used for holding pallet and roller jewels in position. Every now and then I find some other use for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I often think about painting clear varnish on the coil.
    • I hate this battery release design in Ronda movements. It's an accident waiting to happen. One slip and the coil is gone. I wonder if it's a deliberate design.
    • so let's break this down the words restaffed balance wheel correctly would mean no distortion at all on the balance wheel. Which can be done but often isn't. Oftentimes balance wheels end up and times particularly discussing a bimetallic all bent up like the one in this discussion. If the balance wheel is out of round you definitely get a poise issue. You also get an issue if somebody pleases and out around balance wheel and then you fix the out of round now the wheel is poised incorrectly because somebody didn't physically make sure the balance wheel was correct in the first place. Yes people really do poise balance wheels that are neither flat or round it's quite annoying and then it typically with anything vintage there's an extreme likelihood of timing issues. Like the fun I had yesterday the wall thumb was 400 seconds fast and had a 202nd positional problem. So yes it's extremely common on vintage watches you're going to have things to fix from prior inappropriate repairs typically and it depends upon how it nitpicky you want to be here. In other words if you are statically poising the definition of poised would be if you give the balance wheel of push it will rotate eventually come to a stop and it will not rock back and forth at all is considered perfectly poised. Typically when I poise I don't worry about that I will let it rock back and forth because it still going to be within 15 seconds typically. Now the problem with statically poising absolutely perfectly is that it does not take into account the hairspring. This is why ideally if you are really obsessed you statically poise until your close and then finish with dynamic poising. This will take into account the hairspring collet that's probably not a poised collet. Yes Hamilton had another companies had poised collet's they hairspring itself affects the poise so for absolute perfect you have to dynamic poise. So the suggestion has been that it absolutely poised dynamically done balance wheel will not be statically poise absolutely perfectly.    this is an interesting one? In the United States of America over a time span and I don't remember the exact but it ended in the 60s there was a tear off on watches to protect the American watch industry. I've read the books on the tariffs specifications it would bump up the cost of better watches to making them expensive. This is why you will often see a nice Omega watch for instance that was regulated was adjusted and was still keeping really good time will be marked not adjusted. Because the quantity of jewels each jewel bumped up the cost adjustment adjustment and variety of positions bumped up the cost so a huge percentage of watches imported into this country will be not adjusted but they were adjusted at the factory it's just a terra thing then I suspect that even the cheapest of watches probably were somewhat adjusted because if they had zero adjustments I have no idea how bad the timekeeping would be? It's one of the problems of we don't actually have numbers of what the watches really should be doing we only have numbers of timekeeping basically when timing machines exist or for things like railroad grade watches where they absolutely had to know what the timekeeping is doing. So railroad timekeeping specification in this country is of watch Dependent up has to be within plus or -30/2 per week. Which if you compare it to the specifications of chronometer grade will ask which I think could be up to six seconds a day is better than a Rolex. this is one of my amusements at work. There we have that really nice which he timing machine full automatic microphone we look at every single watch and six positions and my boss once the watches all the keep really good time. So basically the watchmakers have learned to let the boss adjust the watches it seems to make him happy and we can do other things like service watches. So yesterday's fun on the 18 size Waltham to get the 400 timing down to think he got it down to 15 seconds it might've been better than that the Delta was still might've been within a minute much better than what it was before but still took more than an hour of time. When we don't specifically charge for this we charge for servicing of the watch we do not typically charge to make your watch keep time in multiple positions so yes it wastes a lot of time unless you're getting paid for it where it can definitely eat up a lot of time to fix vintage watches that I've had interesting repair histories. sorry I don't remember the brand name we once had a watch that was one of I take 1000 it actually was engraved number or something of something in other words it was a very expensive Swiss watch and I believe there was at least one shim under something. I always think of at the factory level if you have to place a shim to me it's a sign of poor manufacturing but there was a Swiss watch a nice watch that had it done. Of course what it may also be a sign of limited quantity of watches where things or adjusted at the factory we end up with interesting problems and I will pick on American pocket watches again with interesting repairs that can happen? For instance pocket watches dropped balance staff is broken possibly the whole jewels are broken and sometimes cap stones get broken. or worst-case I had a Hamilton 992 it actually had little notches taken out of the main plate I always wonder if it got hit by a train and things were dramatically bent in this watch somebody had ground the pallet fork bridge down to accommodate the balance wheel because the balance bridge had been bent to insane proportions it was bent so much it was no longer up and down in alignment so I always wondered if this particular watch got hit by a train. With its ultimate repair it would've been better to just replace the whole movement but instead we cannibalized another movements to replace all of the horribly mutilated parts. Now back to not watches hit by a train while somebody was crossing the railroad track. If the balance jewels are broken they are replaced but the same problem like we have on this group where do you get replacements? This means people in the field will get creative if they replace things with size differently than the original things will change. In other words the total length of the balance staff conceivably will change because they've changed the jewels and they're not properly sized. Then there's a problem of replacement balance staffs I personally have often theorized in the case of  bestfit  that they deliberately made the staffs oversize so the watchmaker can reduce the size. But what if you don't have a lay then what happens? A for instance the Hamilton 992B only has one balance staff as it's of friction staff but often times the friction staff doesn't fit because the replacement staff is slightly oversize which should be impossible but it happens. Often times I have to go through an assortment of staffs to find one that fits because I don't feel like reducing at the size to fit. More common though would be staffs with pivots that are too long and if the watchmaker does not have a lathe again how do they fix that problem well undesirable for us that have to deal with it down the road so an ideal perfect world the adjusted by the factory to whatever the specification was at the time and on a seven jewel American pocket watch it's not going to be railroad timekeeping. If we replace the staff in a proper fashion without bending or distorting anything the watch should keep time within the specification when it was originally made except of course we don't know what the specification was and they definitely did not have timing machines when this watch was made. If we replace the balanced staff with a factory original factory staff and everything should fit perfectly if the jewels were broken and we used factory jewels everything once again would be perfect. Although if you look in the parts book typically for American pocket watches for certain parts they recommend sending the entire watch or parts of the watch back because American watch manufacturing at least until the not sure exact date but sometime past the 20s definitely by the 50s watches were made in batches which is why everything has a serial number and the tools over the course of the batch tend to wear a little bit. So conceivably something made at the beginning and the end of the batch may not fit without adjustments. Plus of course there's variations in parts I like the pic on Elgin because they have one balance staff that comes in four different size variations and then a whole bunch of pivot variations all with the same part number so yes and an absolute perfect world which doesn't exist changing a balance staff with everything factory new would not require poising or truing the balance wheel because everything should still be perfect. But unfortunately in the 100+ year life of your watch things have happened. If you want to grasp that go back and start on page 1 of this discussion as the balance wheels in this discussion have had issues they're not flat the probably out of round there were issues with the jewels there is issues possibly with the staffs. Oh and yes apparently there's a donor watch and if the donor watch is not within a very close serial number range of the original watch it will have very likely sizing differences especially for anything related to the balance wheel because all the vintage watches were adjusted individually in the factory. If you look at a video on I can find it if you want to watch it on YouTube from I believe the 30s where you will see on escapement related stuff every single watch is adjusted which is why you can't just grab the balance wheel from one watch shove it into another one as they were adjusted at the factory                    
    • I see a lot of URLs pointing to 1drv.com which appears to be a CDN for OneDrive.
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England.  
×
×
  • Create New...