Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The size looks correct to me, but not the shape. Once it gets to the external coils it shouldn't create a gap.

Posted

Hey thanks. 

What can I do about shape. Is it a case of unwind and then rewind. Or is there a problem with spring? 

Cheers

Gary

Posted (edited)

The spring size looks about right... 1/3 spring, 1/3 space and 1/3 arbor.

It might be a tad too long, but better a bit longer than shorter, as a shorter spring is more powerful and might cause over-banking

Take the spring out and you'll know if there is a problem with it or not, otherwise your just guessing. Personally, I always change the mainspring for a new one, because if there is a problem with amplitude etc later down the line, you'll find your trying to diagnose a fault when it was staring you in the face all along, for the sake of spending a tenner on a new spring!

Also, you'll need an anti-clockwise mainspring winder to get the old spring back in, if you were to use the old spring and the most common mainspring winders are clockwise, so you might have problems there as well

Edited by Jon
Posted (edited)

This is a 7005 MS, it's the same as a 7009. It looks like yours.

7005-Main-Spring.jpg

In my opinion your spring is bent, so I don't think unwinding and rewinding it will correct it. But I don't know how much will that affect the performance of the watch.

Edited by aac58
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Indeed. I would not attempt one. Here is my messy Sherline setup
    • This conversation is becoming a very confusing. The etachron system is a very nice system for manufacturing watches. As you know it consists of two components the stud and the regulator pins. Beautiful thing of this system is you can open up your regulator pins center the hairspring and as you close the pins they will close equally on both sides providing you centered it in the first place. It's not like you're going to become closer to one side or the other as the definition of the regulator pins is a bit confusing it's not exactly a slot sort of. I'm thinking maybe a little eight reading will be helpful for you. Then the file name was changed by me at the US patent but the wording of Seiko may or may not actually be attached to it soared up? I just did that so I can find it in my files. Normally patents are in people's name if they work for a company the company name will be there you'll notice the person lives in Japan which is interesting as the name would imply that this is a Swiss product. Somewhere I think I have the patents for the stud and I believe that is Swiss like a lot of things their Japanese and Swiss and then the Japanese let the Swiss name stand as it seems you more popular in case as you read up on the patents of the regulator pins or pin will see and it should explain exactly how and why it works also why it's important to always close at an open in specific directions because the pins actually have a shaped to them it's very hard to see the shape as it's very tiny.   As a reminder with this system it's mass-produced. I wouldn't be at all surprised if they use cameras and computers to do all of the adjustments.  The meaning of this is that the majority of watches will function as there supposed to and do what they're supposed to do the system will allow us for some minor in tolerance and has more than likely as I said no human hand is ever touched those watches that's the way they left the factory and they work fine. US2007091729A1 seiko etachron.pdf
    • These still seem stupid expensive for a bottle, but still £100 cheaper than than the Moebius ones. Anyone have any experience of these: https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/epilame-fixodrop-special-bottle-horotec
    • Yes, this is not a basic part. Here are some pictures of making one  
    • I bought an old Bergeon 5555. The bottom of the tank was full of petrified salts, which also corroded the metal parts a bit. I would use just distilled water. 
×
×
  • Create New...