Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My late wife gifted the above noted watch to me in 1962.  It’s a 14 kt, 340 movement that began to stop after several hours of wear.  If I hand wound it 10-12 times, it would run for 2-3 hours and stop.  Off to the repair shop, where I was told it needed a rotor axel, which they said they could not find.  It took no time to find and purchase that part, new in factory envelope on eBay from from a pleasant gentleman in Great Britain. Having lost confidence in the original repair shop, I took it to another well regarded watch repair establishment along with the rotor axel.  After several weeks, they informed me the watch needed a new mainspring, which was in a sealed barrel, and was unobtainable.

After reading on-line watch repair discussions and articles about the difficulty of obtaining parts for watches such as mine, I joined your forum to avail myself of your expert opinions on what can be done to bring back to life this excellent timepiece that has such fond and sentimental memories attached to it.

i have read that it is possible to “open” the barrel of a 340 sealed mainspring using great caution not to damage it, replace the spring then re-close the barrel. Can anyone tell me if the aforementioned procedure can actually be achieved successfully?  Your comments on other possible solutions will be anxiously awaited.

Rentfro1444

 

Posted

You are correct the mainspring is in a sealed unit see service below. Hopefully the fault is not the mainspring.  Although found this on ebay by the look of it the barrel can be opened much the same as Seiko barrels which are supposed to be sealed. 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Parts-Longines-340-Choose-From-List/274345305610?hash=item3fe041260a:m:m2VrcXcjBsMeZIGhZgnxPYg

 

SERVICE:

 

https://watchguy.co.uk/service-longines-automatic-calibre-340/

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks, Clockboy for your prompt reply.  I had previously  read the post you referenced in an attempt as a layman to inform myself as much as possible the cause/causes of my watch’s malfunction.

While I informed the last watch repairer when I took the watch in that it’s mainspring was sealed, their response was they probably had one in stock. And a watch if that would need a new mainspring.  How they could deduce that from the symptoms I provided is above my pay grade. 
 

So the question I pose is this:  is it possible to successfully unseal the mainspring barrel, replace the spring, and reseal the barrel?

Has anyone done this before?  A layman wishing his watch can have a miracle resurrection, due to the knowledge and skill of the professionals who populate this forum.  
Once again, thanks for reading.

Posted

It looks like yes. I have not worked on this caliber but looking at the pics on eBay it seems the barrel can be opened. If so the mainspring could  be removed and be measured and a replacement could be found.  

Posted (edited)

s-l1600.jpg

The barrel appears to be sealed with some sort of riveted arrangement on the lid, and possibly peened at the edges. If you knew exactly how it was fitted together, it should be possible to open it.

This looks like an operation that would require care, to ensure you didn't destroy the lid. I suspect a skilled watchmaker should be able to do this, but I also suspect that a lot of people would judge it too much trouble, and just tell you the part is not available.

In theory, it would also be possible to make a replacement barrel, and/or lid but that would require a level of engineering that puts this well out of the economical to repair category. Fine if you were going to produce 1000 and sell them, or if you were doing it as a hobby, and the time spent wasn't being charged out to a customer, but not for a one off repair.

The part *may* be available to genuine Longines service centres, so you could try them. Expect to pay Longines prices to get it fixed though.

Edited by AndyHull
Posted

Thanks, Andy.  I’m going to try to send you a pic of an opened 340 barrel with enclosed spring that I purchased.  It is a pre-owned  part.  If you get the photo, please let me know what it looks like, and I’d appreciate any one else’s view as well

5ED8AB99-8D86-4BDE-9B77-4221C754FE5C.jpeg

Posted

I see the pic came through - gives me hope I’m not completely clueless.  Thanks to every one who checked it out; am anxious to get your responses.  Thanks again, Andy.

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Rentfro1444 said:

I see the pic came through - gives me hope I’m not completely clueless.  Thanks to every one who checked it out; am anxious to get your responses.  Thanks again, Andy.

 

It looks well used, but complete. My guess is that someone has carefully skimmed off the rounded over (riveted?) top to get in to it. I suspect this shouldn't present any issues. I guess the only way to see if it actually works is to try fitting it.

Posted

I have not as yet received the part, now face another quandary;  I have no idea what kind of price the replacing of the rotor axel and mainspring, along with cleaning should be expected.  The two entities I dealt with in the states had widely differing estimates..  I recognize charges can vary, I’d just like to get some idea of a reasonable estimate for the work.  I’m mindful of the axiom “You are not just paying me for what I do, but the years I spent learning how to it.”


Best Regards,

 

Rentfro1444

Jim Mallett

Posted

Just occurred to me-I hope what I asked is not offensive.  I don’t in any way wish to ask for something I shouldn’t.  Please advise me of I’ve put my foot in it.

Thanks, 

Rentfro1444

Jim

Posted (edited)

These sealed units can be opened as you have found - and re-closed. I have done it with no consequence.

Regarding cost for the work, here is the price list of watch repairs in the UK by Watchguy.

https://watchguy.co.uk/price-list/

Here is an example of a Longines cal 340 repair

https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/library?action=show_photos&wat_id=1713

You could consider sending the watch to the UK for repair.

Edited by Watcher
addition
Posted

Regarding the discepancy in prices, you need to be sure they are offering the same thing. Replacing a mainspring barrel and a rotor axle will not take much time, but a good watch repairer will likely consider a complete service necessary, which involves a complete strip-down, thorough cleaning and inspection of all components. If the watch hasn't been serviced recently, it's due anyway. If you want confidence that this important watch is in good hands, I understand the NAWCC has a list of registered repairers.

Posted

Thanks, Klassiker, for the referral to check NAWCC for registered repairers.   Regarding the previous repairers, the activity was to provide a full cleaning for a stated charge, plus the costs of any parts.  One entity quoted $250.00 for the service, said the watch needed a rotor axle, but returned the watch because they could not locate that part.  (It took me 45 minutes to find the axle; but perhaps they just didn’t want to go to the trouble).  The other verbally quoted $350.00, but on the printed estimate that figure became $450.00, and I was told they could not find the necessary mainspring, which cost they listed at $87.00. ( I wondered how that figure was determined if they could not locate the part.)    So you gather correctly that I was concerned about my watch being in the right hands after these two experiences.
 

Thanks again  for your kind help.  Takes me back to the days you could reliably do business on a handshake.

Posted

I agree most of the time the sealed barrels are actually serviceable. One exception I can think of is Zodiac, can't recall the caliber; the cap was so well burnished in that it was too distorted after removing to use. I ended up making a new cap for that one.

Posted

Thanks, Nickelsilver, you are confirming what others have indicated, that the “sealed barrel” can be opened, and the spring measured and replaced.  I appreciate your input.

Rentfro1444

Posted

I have posted a picture of the opened barrel and mainspring I have purchased.  I came across a listing described as follows:

340-180/1 barrel with arbor complete With mainspring sealed

what is this part?  What is an “arbor” is this part the same as a “barrel complete”?

Thanks for the explanations in advance.

Rentfro1444
 

 

 

Posted
On 5/10/2020 at 5:38 PM, Rentfro1444 said:

 

340-180/1 barrel with arbor complete With mainspring sealed

The barrel is the can that holds the spring, this is usually in the form of a hollow brass drum section with a gear cut on the base, and a lid.
Inside the barrel there will be not just  the mainspring, but also the shaft that connects the center of the spring coil to the winder gear, this shaft is the barrel arbor. (There are other arrangements, but this is by far the most common).

In this case, all of these parts are supplied as a single sealed unit.

Posted

Appreciate it Andy.  I’ve bought the barrel complete with lid removed.  I have an opportunity to purchase the 180 wheel one as backup , and will go ahead for extra backup.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hey everyone! I sure this topic has probably been discussed before, but I want some good recommendations based on experience or knowledge about a good affordable high torque DC motor that I can use for my lathe. I have a little lathe but it has the regular old style motor that was used in the past with a foot controller. However, I would like to improve it by buy a nice motor with a speed controller so I don’t have to use my foot. I would like the motor to have really good torque so that even if I run it at a very low speed, it still can cut material easily. I saw online this brand called Servo sewing machine motor with a speed controller, but I don’t know how good they are and if they would work like I would like to for my lathe. Thank you for all the help!
    • Your only partially correct here. Let's look at a magnified view of the image up above. Then for a flat hairspring to function correctly there has to be a little bit of breathing room unfortunately. If you would like Better timekeeping if you get a watch with the over coil hairspring then those regulator pins are supposed to be as tight as possible but still allow the hairspring the slide. With if the pins are opened up at all you'll see a dramatic timing change based on amplitude. So in our example down below initially hairspring is basically free-floating not touching anything the effective length of the hairspring is at the stud. As the amplitude picks up at some point in time they hairspring will just tide should one pin on one swing and the other pin on the other swing. As soon as it does that it changes the effective length to being closer to the regulator pins. As the amplitude picks up more and more it's obviously touching the regulator pins more and more and the length of the hairspring shortens the watch speeds up. This is where in your video at around 16 minutes he opens up the regulator pins and the watch slows down. This is because they hairspring is no longer bouncing off either pin as much. Then because the watches running slow he speeds it up just to show that yes you could regulate the watch but now you have a problem. Because the regulator pins are much farther apart amplitude is going to have a much greater effect. Like in the image down below they hairspring is properly spaced between the pins. But if those pins are farther apart the effect of amplitude will be much greater. So he speeds up the watch to cancel out the effect of the regulator pins at the particular amplitude which was dial down then when he moves the watch to a crown position which will always have an amplitude decrease because the amount of friction on the sides of the pins now the hairspring is not touching the regulator pins as much and the watch dramatically slows down.   Let's look at the other example image. In this particular example they hairspring is actually touching the regulator pin at restWhich means the effective length of the hairspring is at the regulator pin the watch runs fast. As the amplitude picks up hairspring will lift off the PN moving the effective length towards the stud which is why the watches slowing down. As you can see is the amplitude picks up They hairspring is not centered C not getting even timekeeping and the watch is slowing even more down. But at some point in time when the amplitude gets high enough this will depend upon the watch the spacing Excedrin whatever the amplitude is will be balancing actually between the pins in the watch will of course speed up and then at some point time you reach that sweet spot where it's bouncing between the two pins but as you can see it's at a much higher amplitude. So this is why hairspring has to be properly centered between the pins and the pins have to be at the right spacing otherwise you going to get strange timekeeping based on amplitude which no matter what you're going to get a little bit of that as you do have to have a little bit a spacing. At least on a flat hairspring.  
    • My understanding is that In the Etachron system the spring is only centered n order to set the stud angle when the the pins are wide open and the regulator block in at the midway point.  After that the pins are rotated in one direction only so that the width between the spring and one of the studs is 1/2 width of the spring. This results in the spring always being closer to one stud than other one.   
    • The idea is that the spring is centred between the pins when at rest. Then when the watch is running it will oscillate equally between the pins i.e. bounce off one pin then the other, as the hairspring breathes. If the spring is only hitting one pin, then it isn't centred, and most likely the pins are too far apart. Yes, the regulator pins are there to adjust the effective length of the hairspring. The spacing of the regulator pins should not affect the amplitude.  The vertical positions typically have lower amplitude than the horizontal ones. This has nothing to with the regulator - hairspring interaction. Increased friction in the verticals sucks energy from the system and reduces the amplitude. If the amplitude is less, the breathing is less. More tim between the pins = more effective length. Depending on how well the hairspring is centred, and which direction it sags, some vertical positions might run faster than the horizontal ones, and others slower. For example, if the spring is off centre towards on pin, and pressed against it by gravity, it might never bounce off that pin => faster. At the position 180 deg. away, the spring will spend more time in between the pins => slower.
    • Thank you all for the tips and insights. I'm looking carefully at the Sherline lathes with a milling attachment. I need to figure out exactly what I'd need to get in terms of the base lathe and attachments to be able to fabricate basic parts and learn how to fabricate some of the less basic ones- like a cannon pinion. Thank you again.
×
×
  • Create New...