Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Been struggling through a number of #31 movements. This particular one was bought as a "running" watch, but it's been anemic from the start with some 80° of amplitude, just no momentum at all. I've cleaned it, oiled it, checked it and repeated some 3 times now, with nothing seeming to help.

One thing I've noticed is that the unlubricated movement always sticks hard on the trailing palette pin. Give the pin or balance wheel a flick and the escapement wheel kicks the first pin out easily and then hangs on the 2nd. I've lubed the pins before (which is a bit tough) and this (along with other general oiling) gets it going with the poor amplitude, but never for long.

Could the pin be bent in towards the wheel? Doesn't look it. Hairspring seems nicely shaped. I've lubed both pivots of the balance shaft and attempted to remove end-shake, but that adjustable brass pivot is getting pretty mauled.

I'm really trying to avoid taking this movement apart completely. Any thoughts? Thanks!

Posted

Hi Take all the power off the movement and check where the pallet lies. If it constantly lies on one side even after moving it manually its probably off beat,   If you had the balance out it may not be pinned back in the on beat position. worth checking out. The pallet should lie central  between the banking pins at rest.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Oiling pallet pins directly is not recommended, oil escape teeth, If it didn't run then the fault is something else.

Bent pivot, out of beat, no endshake on balance staff or escape wheel or fork arbour, something rubbing .. are the suspects line up. Haha

Normally out of beat balance dose a few swings, that it ALWAYS sticks hard on the trailing pin, points out to the pin itself.

I would take out the ( balance cock) assembly and nudge the fork to do its jumps, if the trailing pivot keeps on sticking, you have located the fault.

Balance pivot, impulse pin and escape pivot should fall on a straight line, otherwise impulse pin is out of beat.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, watchweasol said:

 If you had the balance out it may not be pinned back in the on beat position

If beat error does turn out to be the issue then you may find that Timex have been particularly helpful.

At some point Timex very helpfully marked some of their balances with a little notch in the rim to assist in positioning the hair spring so that the balance would be in beat.

DSC_5854.JPG.cd2dfc6f59cca9861d9ec6309e43457e.JPG

Assuming the hair spring is not distorted then if you line the pinning point up with the notch you should be as close to being in beat as needed for the watch to run. A little fine tuning may help if you have a TimeGrapher to check beat error.

I don't know when Timex did this, or on which calibers. I'm pretty certain that it's not on everything though.

This balance is from a 1970's M25, and the notch seems to have been there on most of the M24 and M25 movements that I have played with.

It is possible that I have got this wrong as I've not seen this written down anywhere, but I have done an awful lot of Timex's and wherever the notch has been present, aligning the h/s as described has had the watch in beat.

@JerseyMo may be able to provide a more authoritative comment.

  • Like 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, Marc said:

If beat error does turn out to be the issue then you may find that Timex have been particularly helpful.

At some point Timex very helpfully marked some of their balances with a little notch in the rim to assist in positioning the hair spring so that the balance would be in beat.

DSC_5854.JPG.cd2dfc6f59cca9861d9ec6309e43457e.JPG

Assuming the hair spring is not distorted then if you line the pinning point up with the notch you should be as close to being in beat as needed for the watch to run. A little fine tuning may help if you have a TimeGrapher to check beat error.

I don't know when Timex did this, or on which calibers. I'm pretty certain that it's not on everything though.

This balance is from a 1970's M25, and the notch seems to have been there on most of the M24 and M25 movements that I have played with.

It is possible that I have got this wrong as I've not seen this written down anywhere, but I have done an awful lot of Timex's and wherever the notch has been present, aligning the h/s as described has had the watch in beat.

@JerseyMo may be able to provide a more authoritative comment.

yes that bend is so helpful when lining up the spring to the wedge pin hole.  When you get it right it only takes about a half turn of the balance and it all comes together.  than of course the wedge pin decides to take a trip off the tip of the tweezers. :)

Posted
8 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  I have attached the timex 31 service manual for you  incase you dont have it.

31.pdf 3.45 MB · 1 download

Thank you! I was able to hunt that down, otherwise I could never have screwed up as many watches as I have...

Posted
10 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

what you using to time the watches?  then did you service the watch like take it all apart clean it?

 

https://17jewels.info/movements/t/timex/timex-m31/

I don't have anything to time the watches properly. The best I can do is video the balance wheel and estimate how much of an arc it's sweeping. I didn't take this one apart to clean, but just gave it a lighter fluid bath. Didn't want to mess with it too much.

Posted
11 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Take all the power off the movement and check where the pallet lies. If it constantly lies on one side even after moving it manually its probably off beat,   If you had the balance out it may not be pinned back in the on beat position. worth checking out. The pallet should lie central  between the banking pins at rest.

The pallet appears to lie in line.

What I am noticing is that the balance wheel is never turning enough to release the roller pin and passing hollow from the pallet. It's more or less just twitching back and forth...

Posted

the reason I asked about the timing machine was that I'm not sure if you can actually time of pin lever watch you get the proper amplitude. Then even if you can the Chinese timing machine doesn't like to go that low and won't give you the correct number anyway.

Even with your lighter fluid you should think about ultrasonic cleaner of some type. Because older watches coils are going to just rinse away without a little help in an ultrasonic we get into all the cracks and crannies and help that to go away.

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

the reason I asked about the timing machine was that I'm not sure if you can actually time of pin lever watch you get the proper amplitude. Then even if you can the Chinese timing machine doesn't like to go that low and won't give you the correct number anyway.

Even with your lighter fluid you should think about ultrasonic cleaner of some type. Because older watches coils are going to just rinse away without a little help in an ultrasonic we get into all the cracks and crannies and help that to go away.

 

I did clamp an old dremel tool to my workbench and then clamped the container with the lighter fluid so that it was resting on it. At one of the higher RPMs, the fluid was filled with tons of tiny, crisscrossing waves with little droplets bouncing all over the top. Not sure if it qualified as ultrasonic, but there was a hole lot of shaking going on... :)

Posted

there is been more than one watch cleaning machine company and have made devices that vibrate when they spin. But I'm still a big fan of ultrasonic and commercial watch cleaning solutions.

Although for watch like this it's apparently now discontinued which explains why can't find it except here. although apparently is not frowned upon by clock repair people because that still is available and for the material safety sheet it looks like it's probably similar formula. Usually frowned upon by the modern watchmaking community. but on a watch like a Timex where you really don't want to take it all the way apart it would lubricated everything. Although usually are supposed to take the balance wheel out and either not run it through the final rinse or rinse it off afterwards.

https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lr-solo-lube-hf605

https://lrultrasonics.com/solutions/clock-lube-136

 

  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Your only partially correct here. Let's look at a magnified view of the image up above. Then for a flat hairspring to function correctly there has to be a little bit of breathing room unfortunately. If you would like Better timekeeping if you get a watch with the over coil hairspring then those regulator pins are supposed to be as tight as possible but still allow the hairspring the slide. With if the pins are opened up at all you'll see a dramatic timing change based on amplitude. So in our example down below initially hairspring is basically free-floating not touching anything the effective length of the hairspring is at the stud. As the amplitude picks up at some point in time they hairspring will just tide should one pin on one swing and the other pin on the other swing. As soon as it does that it changes the effective length to being closer to the regulator pins. As the amplitude picks up more and more it's obviously touching the regulator pins more and more and the length of the hairspring shortens the watch speeds up. This is where in your video at around 16 minutes he opens up the regulator pins and the watch slows down. This is because they hairspring is no longer bouncing off either pin as much. Then because the watches running slow he speeds it up just to show that yes you could regulate the watch but now you have a problem. Because the regulator pins are much farther apart amplitude is going to have a much greater effect. Like in the image down below they hairspring is properly spaced between the pins. But if those pins are farther apart the effect of amplitude will be much greater. So he speeds up the watch to cancel out the effect of the regulator pins at the particular amplitude which was dial down then when he moves the watch to a crown position which will always have an amplitude decrease because the amount of friction on the sides of the pins now the hairspring is not touching the regulator pins as much and the watch dramatically slows down.   Let's look at the other example image. In this particular example they hairspring is actually touching the regulator pin at restWhich means the effective length of the hairspring is at the regulator pin the watch runs fast. As the amplitude picks up hairspring will lift off the PN moving the effective length towards the stud which is why the watches slowing down. As you can see is the amplitude picks up They hairspring is not centered C not getting even timekeeping and the watch is slowing even more down. But at some point in time when the amplitude gets high enough this will depend upon the watch the spacing Excedrin whatever the amplitude is will be balancing actually between the pins in the watch will of course speed up and then at some point time you reach that sweet spot where it's bouncing between the two pins but as you can see it's at a much higher amplitude. So this is why hairspring has to be properly centered between the pins and the pins have to be at the right spacing otherwise you going to get strange timekeeping based on amplitude which no matter what you're going to get a little bit of that as you do have to have a little bit a spacing. At least on a flat hairspring.  
    • My understanding is that In the Etachron system the spring is only centered n order to set the stud angle when the the pins are wide open and the regulator block in at the midway point.  After that the pins are rotated in one direction only so that the width between the spring and one of the studs is 1/2 width of the spring. This results in the spring always being closer to one stud than other one.   
    • The idea is that the spring is centred between the pins when at rest. Then when the watch is running it will oscillate equally between the pins i.e. bounce off one pin then the other, as the hairspring breathes. If the spring is only hitting one pin, then it isn't centred, and most likely the pins are too far apart. Yes, the regulator pins are there to adjust the effective length of the hairspring. The spacing of the regulator pins should not affect the amplitude.  The vertical positions typically have lower amplitude than the horizontal ones. This has nothing to with the regulator - hairspring interaction. Increased friction in the verticals sucks energy from the system and reduces the amplitude. If the amplitude is less, the breathing is less. More tim between the pins = more effective length. Depending on how well the hairspring is centred, and which direction it sags, some vertical positions might run faster than the horizontal ones, and others slower. For example, if the spring is off centre towards on pin, and pressed against it by gravity, it might never bounce off that pin => faster. At the position 180 deg. away, the spring will spend more time in between the pins => slower.
    • Thank you all for the tips and insights. I'm looking carefully at the Sherline lathes with a milling attachment. I need to figure out exactly what I'd need to get in terms of the base lathe and attachments to be able to fabricate basic parts and learn how to fabricate some of the less basic ones- like a cannon pinion. Thank you again.
    • Welkom Sebastiaan! Veel plezier met deze hobby!
×
×
  • Create New...