Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've got a Longines 290 back together and running in its most basic configuration. However there is substantial Beat error circa 2.5ms. No corrector unfortunately so I'm going to have to adjust the collet (yikes!) 

My understanding from mark's video is to remove the balance from its cock and turn the collet. Is this just a case of trial and error to determine the correct amount and direction? Or is there a little Pro tip that could help?

Cheers all!

Posted

This, what seems a simple job can go horribly wrong. On close inspection see if there is any reference point in relation to the collet split. Before any adjustment make sure the screwdriver shaft is clean with no grease deposits. If you have a ref point move the collet a tiny amount towards that ref point. re-install the balance and see if the direction is correct. Then move in tiny increments until you are satisfied. Getting this style to a zero beat error is difficult,  personally providing I get it within 0.9 or below I leave well alone. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Hi  Once you get the balance out of the watch check on the underside of the rim there is often a mark at the point where the stud is as a reference.  This adjustment can be done with the balance on a balance tack and working through the coils but needs great care. If its somthing you have not undertaken before remove the balance from the cock. but again check for the stud point if none put a mark on the rim yourself markerpen. You might find the attached useful.

19836619954_488f0226d2_b.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

If you find turning the hairspring collet in situ, as watchweasol said, you may find it easier to remove the balance from the cock.

image.png.e335e67c5974d0f5ac5649f06cde0008.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I winder if manufactureres have a special tool for this task, hairsprings on old balance completes come so perfectly in beat.

Posted

iHi  There are specific tools for doing this job by Bergeon but at £45 a go not cheap. TMuir put up a post with a tool he made and I also have made them myself using the metal insert from a winscreen wiper blade and a lot of work with the Dremel and an oil stone.  The red,black,and green ones I bought over 30 years ago.

DSCF3409.JPG

DSCF3408.JPG

DSCF3405.JPG

DSCF3401.JPG

DSCF3402.JPG

DSCF3397.JPG

  • Like 2
Posted

Fraczish,
if you are afraid of damaging something, leave it as is!
A beat error of 2.5 ms does no harm at all, it annoys owners of Chinese TMs only.

If you want to correct this "error", you can at least determine the direction of the needed move:
Release the mainspring fully. The now loose fork will stand a bit more near to one banking pin. In the same direction the collet must be rotated a tiny bit. Then test again with balance wheel mounted. 
To get comparable values, the balance must swing with same amplitude on each test. Procedure can get time consuming like this writing!

Frank

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted

When cleaning the movement, I put just the balance back on the mainplate, then get a line of sight down the centre of the escape wheel/pallet jewels and between the banking pins to the impulse jewel. If not central, rotate the balance and make a mark opposite the stud.

You can do it with the movement assembled, but I find it easier with a bare movement and no pallet.

I can usually get to about 1 m/s just by sight. Which is good enough without an adjuster - I think people worry too much about a bit of beat error. As @clockboy says above, things can easily go horribly wrong.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted

I usually place the balance on a staking block and adjust with an oiler if I don't have a purpose made tool which fits. I like to find the place the stud should be by bringing the balance wheel to the correct position when fitted and with the help of a microscope graticule, move the microscope to look down on the balance vertically, rotate the graticule to an angle to match the stud and pivot - so I can easily see where the line of the graticule sits on the balance rim. I can then use a screw or marker pen mark (sometimes there's already a scratch), then use it to help get the stud on that same line of the graticule, between the balance pivot and a pre-determined screw or mark on the balance rim. The microscope isn't necessary but makes it easier to be precise.. I used to do the same but with a screwdriver instead of the graticule/ microscope.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I made this tool last week. Got the idea from an item on ebay. I haven't tested it on an actual watch yet, but on a scrap balance, it works very well. With this, in theory, the collet can be adjusted in situ. The possibility of getting a zero beat error is very high.

20200701_115125.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
23 hours ago, praezis said:

A beat error of 2.5 ms does no harm at all, it annoys owners of Chinese TMs only.

What, to you mind, is the limit to this?

Posted

 Fine adjustment for "in beat"  is doable by moving hairspring through stud hole, just unpin the HS , adjust and repin.

Needless to say, no need to push the pin all the way home untill you are satisfied with the beat error and call the adjustment final.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 Fine adjustment for "in beat"  is doable by moving hairspring through stud hole, just unpin the HS , adjust and repin.

Needless to say, no need to push the pin all the way home untill you are satisfied with the beat error and call the adjustment final.

 

Farnkly speaking, I am lazier to even do this. Uncut pins come aprox 2 cm long,

which I use while still adjusting, once I called it in-beat, I cut the pin in situ and push the rest home inside the stud hole. No loosing the pin. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, spectre6000 said:

What, to you mind, is the limit to this?

Hello,
short question, but a bit difficult answer.
This error has little to no influence on performance as it is compensated by right and left swing of the balance wheel.

There is little info on the topic. Values claimed in the net are just opinions without substantiation.

The manual of a timing machine gave the answer: limit for the esc. error is 15 degrees. Here the unpowered escapement still rests in lift position.

Unfortunately most TMs do not display the real esc. error (degrees) but just milliseconds that are not directly related to the real esc. error - ms value changes with amplitude and with bph despite a constant esc. error! One exception is PCTM that displays degrees, too. 

If you convert deg to ms, 15 degrees equates 9.6 ms @ 200 deg amplitude, @ 18000. Adjustment to 1/10 of that limit = 1.0 ms will be excellent.

Frank

  • Like 3
Posted

All above tools are handy to turn the collet with, but its still trial and error.

NOS balance completes are so fine adjusted to near zero beat error, I was thinking manufacturers might use a mchine of some sort to bulk produce and so finely adjusted.

Posted (edited)

Thank you for everyone's thoughts on this subject, very helpful indeed! 

I decided initially that I would tackle this and took the balance out. On closer inspection the index finger (is that what it's called?) Wasn't like any I'd played with or even seen before in that it didn't have a slot to rotate it in order to release the hairspring. At this point I decided that this was not the movement to be trying this on and I can live with it for now. I will probably revisit it when a little more confident. 

Definitely going to have a go at adjustment with the spring on, just on a few scrappers first. 

Thanks again chaps. 

Edited by Fraczish
  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 7/6/2020 at 6:27 PM, mikepilk said:

I put just the balance back on the mainplate

@mikepilk I'm experimenting/practicing adjusting the collet on a scrap movement to build the confidence needed to adjust the collet on a balance that matters to me. I'm trying some different techniques. So, my question is simply this; when you put the balance back on the main plate, do you leave the collet/hairspring mounted on the staff with the stud in the stud hole, or do you remove the collet/hairspring first. If you don't remove it I guess you will have to hold the balance still (as it will want to swing back to its relaxed state) when making the mark opposite the stud? Hope that explanation was understandable! Thanks!

Posted
12 hours ago, VWatchie said:

@mikepilk I'm experimenting/practicing adjusting the collet on a scrap movement to build the confidence needed to adjust the collet on a balance that matters to me. I'm trying some different techniques. So, my question is simply this; when you put the balance back on the main plate, do you leave the collet/hairspring mounted on the staff with the stud in the stud hole, or do you remove the collet/hairspring first. If you don't remove it I guess you will have to hold the balance still (as it will want to swing back to its relaxed state) when making the mark opposite the stud? Hope that explanation was understandable! Thanks!

Yes. I have the balance complete with hairspring stud fixed. Then gently rotate the balance with a finger until the jewel is between the banking pins, and note the balance position - against a balance screw, or use a marker pen.

If it needs adjustment, I'll remove the balance, hang it on a balance tack, and make an adjustment (as Mark's video shows above). I filed down the end of an old screwdriver so that it will fit in to the slot in the collet. 
This is the part to practice. It's VERY easy to damage the hairspring. Older 'blue' hairsprings especially are very easy to distort, and when hanging on the tack, I'll try to support them to stop too much stretch. 
If it's a very small hairspring, or a more valuable movement with no replacement hairsprings likely, I'll reduce the risk by taking the balance off the cock, and adjust as @Jon shows above. There's always the chance of damage either way, so if I get with say, 2ms, I consider that acceptable and stop fiddling.

I wanted to know how much I needed to turn the collet to correct the beat error, so did a calculation - I can't find it at the moment, but from what I remember (for a 18,000 bph movement, and 250 deg amplitude) it's about 4 - 5 deg.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Yes. I have the balance complete with hairspring stud fixed. Then gently rotate the balance with a finger until the jewel is between the banking pins, and note the balance position - against a balance screw, or use a marker pen.

technically this is correct but it's also sort of incorrect? The problem is there's a tiny bit a play of the roller jewel in the fork slot. This means you can have the fork absolute perfect between the banking pins and the timing machine may disagree with your assessment.

2 hours ago, mikepilk said:

If it needs adjustment, I'll remove the balance, hang it on a balance tack,

personally I never hang balance wheels on the balance tack. In the past I found it stretches the hairspring and if you have just the balance with hairspring it makes it easier to see what you're doing as you can see where the stud is in relationship to whatever you are using as a reference.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

technically this is correct but it's also sort of incorrect? The problem is there's a tiny bit a play of the roller jewel in the fork slot. This means you can have the fork absolute perfect between the banking pins and the timing machine may disagree with your assessment.

 

On 7/6/2020 at 6:27 PM, mikepilk said:

I put just the balance back on the mainplate, then get a line of sight down the centre of the escape wheel/pallet jewels and between the banking pins to the impulse jewel.

I believe there's been a slight misunderstanding!? As I understand it @mikepilk doesn't have the fork installed when making the assessment. Just the balance assembly.

Posted
3 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

 

I believe there's been a slight misunderstanding!? As I understand it @mikepilk doesn't have the fork installed when making the assessment. Just the balance assembly.

That is correct, I don't usually have the fork installed. As @JohnR725 mentions, it's won't be exact, but it's close enough for a starting point.

After cleaning the main plate + installed balance in the ultrasonic cleaner, I fit the balance jewels, then do the check.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tool for removing or pressing the bezel? Most likely you have to remove the bezel (with a knife) before removing old crystal or inserting a new one. You can press the bezel with the crystal press if you have a suitable die with straight walls or otherwise a die that has enough clearance that it doesn't touch the crystal when pressing the bezel.
    • This will be my first crystal replacement, I have a press, but looking at the watch I wonder if I might need a bezel tool also. Any and all help appreciated. 
    • I'm not entirely sure you fully understand what he's doing in the video. For one thing he's giving examples of things like about 16 minutes he talks about opening up the regulator just a little bit. Opening up the regulator slows the watch down to compensate for that he moves the regulator fast and now it's keeping time again but the regulator pins are too far apart. I have an image down below on top of it shows the effect of regulator pins and amplitude. If the regulator pins are farther apart than the example down below then at a higher amplitude timekeeping will be much worse. Why the regulator pins are supposed to be adjusted as an average rule approximately twice the thickness of the mainspring itself. In other words if you look at the spacing it have one half of the hairspring thickness on either side of the hairspring itself. There is like he talks about the video a little bit of adjustment here and there. So in his example where he opened them up it will really dramatically screw up timekeeping based on amplitude. Then when you get to the 20 some minutes like you say he is adjusting the regulator pins closer together to get a more even timekeeping based on amplitude and amplitude changes are caused by going to various positions. Then and the other example of the image down below regulator pins too far apart and they hairspring is not centered and look what that does the timekeeping. So hairspring is supposed to be centered regulator pins are supposed to properly spaced. Then you get reasonably even timekeeping like it shows in the upper image. It's not like we're regulating out positional errors like poising errors because that's something entirely different.   In the part number above and in the video both of you left off details. I which version of either of your watches I will just make you's timing specifications for your watch down below may specify how you're supposed to do it other words you wind up the watch fully wound up you wait 10 to 60 minutes in the four positions it should be within 60 seconds. Yes it can be closer but you may not actually get zero.     Now let's compare with the 2892 and see where we might have a discrepancy. First off we have a problem of which one is a using did he use the chronometer grade 1 or the top grade or what?  None is basically just much tighter timing tolerances. So when he's using an example watch conceivably might be a chronometer grade watch then things are going to be much more  perfect than what you're going to see.       NH35_TG.pdf ETA 2892-A2 Manufacturing info.pdf
    • Note the 8992 is 850 pounds for a liter. I think this is really for industrial settings like they say, where it would be used as a final bath in a 20,000 buck cleaning machine. I use the 8981.   That is excellent- I don't often get to see a serviced watch 5 years later, but when I do I expect to see pretty much the same oiling on the balance jewels as when it went out. I think at that area, being essentially sealed, it really should remain fairly pristine for likely 10 years. It's why some makers go to the trouble to use cap jewels on the escape wheel as well- not so much for friction reduction, but to keep the oil longer where it really counts.
×
×
  • Create New...