Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 6/19/2024 at 9:39 PM, AndyHull said:

There are still quite a few around, but you have to be patient.

Absolutely they do, just because ebay doesn't cough up much these days Carboot day today,here are 4 that cost me 12 quid for all. The Sekonda is immaculate, had the back off and very possibly only a service required. Both timex also work, though the 70's style not for long the other has been running since 10.oclock this morning,  the dial of that one looks half decent the glass lets it down and the Limit quite poor but case is good and i have the same one in black. I was ten minutes late of picking up a non working Bulova for the same 3 quid, but these are good, I'm especially liking the retro Timex.  Yes the 404 are out there, and no postage with these,this thread lives on Andy 👍

17189216559721801700367200833980.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

 

The 0.99p Casio MQ-24 turned up.

It is brand new, never worn, still with the plastic protection film on the front. RRP is apparently £59.00 but you can pick them up for less.

It did however have a flat battery, but since I have a bunch of brand new AG4, I picked up recently, that wasn't an issue.

BrandNew.JPG

Guess what I will be wearing in the garden tomorrow.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 3
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

CIMG1042.thumb.JPG.9e60963bfe57781ffa0f73821b79d864.JPG

I had a spare 5 mins yesterday so I took a look at the first of the "three for a quid" I picked up recently.

 

A new battery, a new strap and a fumigation of the case and it looks like new.

CIMG1044.thumb.JPG.5f6cdbaa0ddd6bb636f3a90a12dd340f.JPG

Perhaps its most impressive feature is the lume. In the dark, it lights up like Hollywood nuclear spill, and even in daylight it has a slight glow. Well worth thirty three and a third pence I would say.

CIMG1038.JPG

  • Like 4
Posted

CIMG1054.thumb.JPG.11170f9182ffae72ff3c8f4a2c8856d3.JPG

The second "three for a quid" got a new after-market band. I was going to go with a black one but plumped instead for a bright orange.

Described as "High Quality Rubber Wrist Strap For Casio MW-59 MW59 MQ-24 MQ24 MQ-71 MQ71 MQ-76 MQ76 Replacement Black Bracelet WatchBand Strap" on AliExpress, it cost a mere £1.75 plus vat, free shipping (as I was ordering other stuff, so combined shipping was free).

Add in a battery and I now have two MQ-24s that look like new.

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

IMG_5974.thumb.JPG.673e5b1d02f5f8fdce0c0513e91b4f8f.JPG

Landed this Benrus within a quarter of the current 404 exchange rate, but with cheap shipping, so I'm counting it. Crystal is a lost cause, which sucks, because it's one of those that requires the ID and OD to match the case to close and seal... Bummer... Last time I attempted one of these, I had to find one with a slightly larger OD and shave it down, which was decidedly unfun. Kept would be vandals from opening/ruining it though, so that's a win! It's also missing the split stem crown, and the crown tube is somewhat less than circular. The case is all stainless though (one of my requirements to place any bid).

IMG_5976.thumb.JPG.caf0890cac6cf40b6f3d527baec6bdc8.JPG

Inside is a 17 jewel ETA 1256, which is a pretty neat movement with some cool features. Very early automatic, evidenced by a lack of shock protection (it runs if you get it going, and has been running from the automatic wind during the time I've been typing this, so that bodes well). According to the link a few lines back there, it is the "prime father of all ETA selfwinding movements ever made". Neat! It has a "springless click reverser" with a "double click wheel". I'm not sure if that's exclusively dealing with the automatic works, or if it would wind both ways if I had a crown to wind it with. Very cool watch! If I can get the crystal and crown/stem sorted out, it'll make for a very nice watch! For now though, it goes into the project box.

  • Like 1
Posted

I had some success paring down acrylic crystal lips by mounting a big blob of blue tack on the end of a cordless drill chuck.

You can centre it by squidging  the crystal around on the the blue tack till you are happy that it runs true.

Then its just a matter of using a little coarse sandpaper and some digital calipers to chase the size down to what you needed. Its a little crude, but since you are typically only removing a few tenths of a millimetre and acrylic sands down quickly, its is a lot easier than you might think. Practice on a few scrap crystals first.

The "blue tack chuck" also works for polishing acrylic crystals too. 

Hot glue might also work, as it parts company from whatever it is stuck to with a little isopropanol, which shouldn't damage the crystal. I may give that a try.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I guess these qualify as 404's.  Freebies from a watchmaker friend of mine.  I guess he doesn't think that I am busy enough.

Waltham automatic with PUW 1463 movement.  17 jewels.  It's a runner.

20240808_183855.jpg

20240808_183945.jpg

20240808_183954.jpg

 

I don't know the manufacturer of the "Time is Money" pocket watch.  My first experience with a pin set movement.  Pallet fork is all metal.  A few jewels are evident.  Time sets fine.  Trying to wind the mainspring has no resistance, so maybe a broken mainspring.  Balance seems good.  Looks like a mucky mess around the ratchet wheel.

20240808_162214.jpg

20240808_162245.jpg

Edited by gpraceman
  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

Looking at it (the pin set) on this bigger screen, that center pivot is really hanging out there! I want to see more of that movement... Especially the all-metal pallet fork and the keyless works. Also, looks like she might have lost some balance screws along the way...

Edited by spectre6000
Posted
18 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

Looking at it (the pin set) on this bigger screen, that center pivot is really hanging out there! I want to see more of that movement... Especially the all-metal pallet fork and the keyless works. Also, looks like she might have lost some balance screws along the way...

No missing balance screws.  No other markings to identify the manufacturer by.  Might be awhile before I get around to this project to see how it is constructed.

2024_0809_095436_001.JPG

2024_0809_095507_002.JPG

2024_0809_095557_003.JPG

2024_0809_095621_004.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Oh wow! I didn't understand the "Time is Money" comment until that last photo. That is interesting... We need a date on that. Reminds me of this 19th century portrait of a guy with Jetsons glasses (actually for protection from the harmful effects of the light from whale oil lamps, whatever those effects were purported to be):

000.jpg.591d1cfabad2163c0ca42ad6f9192434.jpg

Edited by spectre6000
  • Haha 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 8/10/2024 at 9:41 AM, spectre6000 said:

Oh wow! I didn't understand the "Time is Money" comment until that last photo. That is interesting... We need a date on that.

It's also on the back of the case.

20240820_104034.jpg

Posted

image.png.0fd61bd7a2517f485df1b2818d59d6db.png

This "twofer" just arrived. The Amida runs, but needs serviced and the Timex stutters forward a couple of seconds after a shake but doesn't run.  I suspect both will work just fine after a little TLC. I'll keep you posted on progress.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)


A 1972 Timex is on its way. Listed as "not working" (no surprise there) and "automatic" (it isn't).
It looks to be in reasonable condition, but pretty filthy (also no surprise).

This one came in at exactly £4.04 plus postage.

AsPurchased1.jpg

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, AndyHull said:

A 1972 Timex is on its way

This is such a nice model. Timex couldn't make a bad looking watch between 1968 and 1974 if they tried. (they absolutely could in 1975 and beyond though)

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, mbwatch said:

This is such a nice model. Timex couldn't make a bad looking watch between 1968 and 1974 if they tried. (they absolutely could in 1975 and beyond though)

how about an example of said ugly watch from 1975 and beyond!

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, JerseyMo said:

how about an example of said ugly watch from 1975 and beyond!

Well okay it's out of scope for 404 but here are a handful of winners from the 1976 catalog. (I should add, they couldn't make a bad one before 1968 either, but they just didn't swing for the fences with as much variety)

I have never seen 475521 in the metal, but from auction photos it's pretty puzzling what they were reaching for with that dial. If you have one in your collection and can produce a good looking photo, I'm happy to be proven wrong!

Screenshotfrom2024-08-3113-04-15.png.2e4b83f9b2ebb3934182bfa21ae927af.pngScreenshotfrom2024-08-3113-06-41.png.18f47fc6e8ad2d41d4484e44c49fcc8b.png

Edited by mbwatch
Posted

My first foray into the 404 club is an accidental one.

My girlfriend's 13 year old daughter picked up this cute little Timex at a thrift store for $1. She'd been wearing it semi-ironically as a fashion statement and I asked if she'd like it to work. "Sure." So I took it home, tried a battery, and it lit right up! So of course I had to clean it up, polish the crystal, and lubricate the stem.

IMG_20240901_203422.thumb.jpg.66c3e056d3cc45fd3be081097c4fe4b9.jpg

IMG_20240901_203241.thumb.jpg.feab5b1fa8a1e720ee6c6ea56126780b.jpg

IMG_20240901_203244.thumb.jpg.ef2f2c49725eb4e7007d3bd2eda4c675.jpg

IMG_20240901_203558.thumb.jpg.40c420e319700fc16441b52ddcb12d3c.jpg

IMG_20240901_203953.thumb.jpg.0495d2c31509542aa75b878565ca2490.jpg

IMG_20240901_210952.thumb.jpg.d86af6e6dc391d0989fbfb706a970414.jpg

IMG_20240901_213709.thumb.jpg.7066f1fe0f797518c802a1fb6616f1b0.jpg

IMG_20240901_220404.thumb.jpg.b842d53cd94ac35e2d811f9d8f41886a.jpg

IMG_20240901_220417.thumb.jpg.69f00abc72e78b233df133c97c7aa2c4.jpg

 

Not bad for $1! I made a little video of it functioning:

 

Then while searching for an instruction manual for her, I found this:

image.png.c2b78ed1d1ce30dfc4080eebafb9b4a7.png

🤯

And this was her response via text:

image.png.b8f66d8a6eb17d7e66f39ec1810ae501.png

  • Like 6
  • Haha 2
Posted
On 8/31/2024 at 2:14 PM, mbwatch said:

Well okay it's out of scope for 404 but here are a handful of winners from the 1976 catalog. (I should add, they couldn't make a bad one before 1968 either, but they just didn't swing for the fences with as much variety)

I have never seen 475521 in the metal, but from auction photos it's pretty puzzling what they were reaching for with that dial. If you have one in your collection and can produce a good looking photo, I'm happy to be proven wrong!

Screenshotfrom2024-08-3113-04-15.png.2e4b83f9b2ebb3934182bfa21ae927af.pngScreenshotfrom2024-08-3113-06-41.png.18f47fc6e8ad2d41d4484e44c49fcc8b.png

It is a Camouflaged dial.  Here is one in the waiting to be repaired file.  BTW I do agree that not all the dials or even case styles were interesting.  You can see that Timex put more effort into the Electric and early quartz starting in the late 70's.  

 

Capture.JPG

  • Like 3
Posted
16 minutes ago, JerseyMo said:

It is a Camouflaged dial.

Well it worked, because I was sitting here trying to figure out how I could see the carpet through the back of the watch.

  • Haha 7
Posted

AsPurchased2Cropped.jpg.183dd2c657e7dc006b9faf8b81af97fd.jpg

For 0.99p who (other than every sane person on ebay obviously) could possibly resist.
A non working Newmark with fixed lugs, probably from the late fifties or early sixties.

 

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...