Jump to content

Help with diagnosis: Dial up vs. dial down performance after service


Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Last night I completed a service of a Seiko 6309A movement. While the performance is much better now, I notice a troubling issue on the timegrapher.

Here is the reading dial down:

1379998773_ScreenShot2020-07-25at08_40_51.thumb.png.e4042a642494987a9424850b41591fd1.png

Here is the reading dial up:

1368243426_ScreenShot2020-07-25at08_40_44.thumb.png.a86860d08d0b41063941b6844fcf28e3.png

 

Because I am seeing all that noise when the watch is dial-up, I'm assuming it is something gravity-related, which makes me think it might be the shock absorber on the balance pivot.

Does this make sense? Are there any other areas of the movement that might be effected like that by gravity in between two Dial Up and Dial Down?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be gravity-related, in the sense that too much end-shake allows parts to move to different positions. Then they interact differently with one-another.

What is noticeable here, apart from the "dirty" traces, is the poor amplitude (I am assuming almost fully-wound) in both positions, the difference in amplitude, and the difference in beat. That suggests a lot of different problems to me, which could include dirt, too much end-shake (pallet, balance, escape wheel), too little end-shake (train), bent banking pins (if this movement has them), worn jewels, and no doubt a number of other possibilities.

I would strip down the escapement, reclean and check all the parts for contamination and wear. When you have the balance and pallet out, check the train is running freely.

Let us know what you find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, thanks for that.

The train is running freely (with a puff of air and comes to a stop cleanly, same when barrel is installed and mainspring wound a bit) and the movement was assembled after a cleaning and visual inspection.

Im trying to find out if this seems like a common issue due to one of the shock absorbers being problematic (whether it's dirt, lubrication, etc.). But from what you're saying there's nothing you see that points to that over any other issue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most common cause is staff pivot, excess end shake also lets different part of pivot come in contact with the jewel which exacrebates the retarding effect of a bent pivot. So before strip I check end and side shakes of staff, fork arbour and escape. What do you get in pendent up and down positions?

 

Edited by Nucejoe
shock spring can cause problem if doesn't keep the jewels down in place.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no professional and certainly no expert either, but I don't think it's that simple. If it was just one shock absorber then the performance would tend to be better with that side of the movement uppermost. That's not happening here. You are losing 30-odd degrees of amplitude.

Assuming you cleaned, inspected and lubricated both shock absorber assemblies, and you didn't see any major issues, then I can't see it being e.g. a stray speck of dirt on one end-stone. If you didn't unspect them though, then they could both be cruddy, worn or cracked.

Otherwise, if the balance is running true and without excessive end-shake, then I'd be looking at the pallet as the next most likely culprit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There could be a bunch of reasons for this but what one can see from those graphs the fault probably is in the escapement.
I would check the escape wheel pivots for ware and tare, and the escape wheel faces for ware and dirt. 
Next I would check the pallet fork pivots and the faces of the jewels.
The last point to look at is if the hairspring is flat, it could hit the regulator pin if not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

Most common cause is staff pivot, excess end shake also lets different part of pivot come in contact with the jewel which exacrebates the retarding effect of a bent pivot. So before strip I check end and side shakes of staff, fork arbour and escape. What do you get in pendent up and down positions?

 

Pendent up and down is "in between" these two kind of. Much better than the dial up reading.

I'll start with trying to re-set the shock absorber

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Klassiker said:

I'm no professional and certainly no expert either, but I don't think it's that simple. If it was just one shock absorber then the performance would tend to be better with that side of the movement uppermost. That's not happening here. You are losing 30-odd degrees of amplitude.

I don't know if I trust the amplitude reading on that timegrapher when the reading is so dirty. Just like the beat error shows as ~5 ms, when it is clearly around .1-.2ms as evidenced by the DD reading. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, pubudeux said:

Pendent up and down is "in between" these two kind of. Much better than the dial up reading.

I'll start with trying to re-set the shock absorber

How can shock absorber affect amplitude or positional variations? Unless loose and fail to keep the jewel-chaton assembly down and let it move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nucejoe said:

How can shock absorber affect amplitude or positional variations? Unless loose and fail to keep the jewel-chaton assembly down and let it move.

or you mean to switch upper and lower jewels around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nucejoe said:

or you mean to switch upper and lower jewels around.

One thing I wasnt sure about: is there an up side and down side for these jewels or are they completely flat on both sides? I assumed i could choose one side as the "down" side to oil after cleaning. These are Seiko Diashock settings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, pubudeux said:

I don't know if I trust the amplitude reading on that timegrapher when the reading is so dirty. Just like the beat error shows as ~5 ms, when it is clearly around .1-.2ms as evidenced by the DD reading

several things need to be in agreement before the timing machine is telling you the correct information. Otherwise it's telling you you have a problem. The graphical display and numeric display should indicate something similar. then visually looking at the balance wheel it should resemble what you're seeing on the timing machine. For instance timing machine tells you have a 300° aptitude the balance wheel looks like it's barely moving you have a problem. this particular example is a common problem with all timing machines. If the amplitude is too low the machine reads the wrong part of the waveform gives you happy numbers it just aren't there.

then if the graphical display is showing totally random dots then the numerical display is totally worthless also. So many times people look at the numbers and and totally ignore the graphical display because they like the numbers better.

Then there's a problem you're having that 4.9 ms the line spacing is not right. I'm giving a link below you'll have to scroll down to the pictures and you'll see that 4 ms lines are easily twice as far apart as yours.

then when giving us timing results it's always nice if you would give us one crown position like crown down for instance.

2 hours ago, pubudeux said:

The train is running freely (with a puff of air and comes to a stop cleanly, same when barrel is installed and mainspring wound a bit) and the movement was assembled after a cleaning and visual inspection.

another test to try for train freedom is backspin? This is where with the pallet fork out you start to wind the barrel and stop. As you start to wind the mainspring will supply energy to the train the train will spin when you stop winding the trains momentum will carry it past the stopping point it will actually back wind the mainspring just a little bit. as you're watching the escape wheel spin and your winding when you stop the momentum of the train will continue forward you can see that then it will ask he stopped for just a second sometimes you can see it sometimes you can't and then the escape wheel will spin backwards. So if you see the backspin that's usually a sign of a train this properly free. Doesn't occur on all watches for variety of reasons though usually watches with sweep second hands it has Springs associated with them.

1 hour ago, Klassiker said:

I'm no professional and certainly no expert either, but I don't think it's that simple. If it was just one shock absorber then the performance would tend to be better with that side of the movement uppermost. That's not happening here. You are losing 30-odd degrees of amplitude.

usually for dial-up and dial down you will see an amplitude drop if the pivot is bad but? But here we have a graphical display indicating a problem in both images. There is a problem beyond dial-up and dial down plus having numbers that we do not believe on the timing machine at least I don't believe them.

then there is the other problem I seriously doubt that that's a 4.9 ms beat error because it just isn't.with a small graphical display of the Chinese 1000 machine the graphical display cannot indicate the same thing the numerical display indicates. So in a certain points you'll get a rollover effect where the lines are closer together than what they should be for the same numeric results. At 4.9 ms you should be just about on the extreme of the graphical display and that looks much closer to one or 2 ms so your graphical display is not agreeing with numeric results this is come up before you can see it in the link below scroll down you can see images.

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/9683-hi-strange-timegrapher-reading/

I am curious about how do you lubricate the escapement?

then visually or definitely having an escapement issue. I'm also suspicious of the numeric results for the amplitude. If you're amplitude is below 200° then you getting interesting affect on the timing machine everything gets magnified as the amplitude drops all your problems get much much worse. So as others of set up above you seem to be having more than one issue perhaps

1 minute ago, pubudeux said:

One thing I wasnt sure about: is there an up side and down side for these jewels or are they completely flat on both sides? I assumed i could choose one side as the "down" side to oil after cleaning. These are Seiko Diashock settings.

classically with the end stones one side is flat and one side is curved. The curved side goes out the flat side goes in. It's a really easy mistake for new people to make. If you not sure which side is which look for a reflection off the top of the jewel. Like a fluorescent lamp reflection is much more noticeable you'll see the curvature the jewel. They were definitely design with the flat side going in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, pubudeux said:

One thing I wasnt sure about: is there an up side and down side for these jewels or are they completely flat on both sides? I assumed i could choose one side as the "down" side to oil after cleaning. These are Seiko Diashock settings.

One side is flat which is to face the pivot the other is domed

Edited by Nucejoe
i mean the end stones. jewels are same on both side
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

One side is flat which is to face the pivot the other is domed

This is very good to know. Since there is a 50% chance I put the wrong side facing the pivot, I will attack this first and then move on.

11 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I am curious about how do you lubricate the escapement?

Per the Seiko 6309 tech sheet I lubricated the shock absorber jewels and the pallet fork jewels with Moebius 9010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dial Up & Dial down variances I have found is usually is either too much end shake or the the H/S is not flat . I would would check the end shake and if OK re-clean the balance assembly and re-lube the cap jewels. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, pubudeux said:

This is very good to know. Since there is a 50% chance I put the wrong side facing the pivot, I will attack this first and then move on.

Per the Seiko 6309 tech sheet I lubricated the shock absorber jewels and the pallet fork jewels with Moebius 9010.

That doesn't explain the variation even if you did put the end stones upside down. Rarely a case of end stone just barely pushing on pivot can drop amplitude but the drop would be the same in FU and FD.

If the jewel- chaton sits incorrectly ( hard to acomplish) then we might say the shock springs are holding the jewels down in wrong position. 

I wouldn't tear the movement down, but check the endshakes,  proper seating of the jewels and examine staff and pivot under high magnification.

Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pubudeux said:

Per the Seiko 6309 tech sheet I lubricated the shock absorber jewels and the pallet fork jewels with Moebius 9010.

I snipped an image out  of these 6309 tech sheet. So I assume you're oiling like it shows one drop on each of the stones correct? Because if you are you're doing it incorrectly even if that's what the tech sheet shows. Tech sheets are interesting in that they don't always explain techniques were quantity is they just show you where. If you have uneven lubrication on the escape wheel you can actually see that on the timing machine.

6309 pallet fork oil.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

That doesn't explain the variation even if you did put the end stones upside down. Rarely a case of end stone just barely pushing on pivot can drop amplitude but the drop would be the same in FU and FD

conceivably will probably turn out to be something simple but? It just looks like too much is going on here something just isn't right

ignoring the timing machine numbers visually looking at the beats of the watch is the watch in beat?

Then how exactly are you winding this watch up?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey all,

Thanks for all the replies and suggestions. To begin, I took out, wiped off oil with Rodico and re-lubricated cap jewel, making sure to lubricate the flat side, which would contact the pivot. I then set it and took care make sure the spring was secured in place.

Here are the readings:

Pendant Down:

593144636_ScreenShot2020-07-25at14_42_42.thumb.png.1ed4479f733f0af0a089ef5f3c4ca0fe.png

Dial Down:

280742588_ScreenShot2020-07-25at14_44_04.thumb.png.1a72d9f892fd899f47471e48171227c4.png

Dial Up:

1422996665_ScreenShot2020-07-25at14_44_46.thumb.png.251ca92c4feb517b553e234848e33d3a.png

Pendant Up:

114500693_ScreenShot2020-07-25at14_45_21.thumb.png.0f425acc62e613fe85ac72baab7a588e.png

 

So I know there is low amplitude, but it does seem like the escapement itself is working decently well. I wound the watch by winding the ratchet wheel with a screwdriver.

 

I think the weird readings were caused by my positioning of the cased watch on the timegrapher, as when I have the crown facing right, the readings come out dirty, and when facing left (away from spring handle as pictured), the readings come out clean. Pretty strange to me, but I guess there was some kind of interference or shaking with the crown?

1956248826_ScreenShot2020-07-25at14_45_58.thumb.png.0ab27c44c849f361a4c327cb4a3bfd84.png

 

I think my amplitude issues might be mainspring related, as this was my first time servicing a mainspring and I definitely didn't give it the best clean possible. The positive thing is, the amplitude is about 50-70 degrees better than what it was before the overhaul :)

Edited by pubudeux
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
classically with the end stones one side is flat and one side is curved. The curved side goes out the flat side goes in. It's a really easy mistake for new people to make. If you not sure which side is which look for a reflection off the top of the jewel. Like a fluorescent lamp reflection is much more noticeable you'll see the curvature the jewel. They were definitely design with the flat side going in.

Take a slo-mo video of the balance with your iPhone and determine the amplitude in both positions. If there is a significant difference, then go to all the other advice.

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, pubudeux said:

Hey all,

Thanks for all the replies and suggestions. To begin, I took out, wiped off oil with Rodico and re-lubricated cap jewel, making sure to lubricate the flat side, which would contact the pivot. I then set it and took care make sure the spring was secured in place.

...

I think the weird readings were caused by my positioning of the cased watch on the timegrapher, as when I have the crown facing right, the readings come out dirty, and when facing left (away from spring handle as pictured), the readings come out clean. Pretty strange to me, but I guess there was some kind of interference or shaking with the crown?

...

I think my amplitude issues might be mainspring related, as this was my first time servicing a mainspring and I definitely didn't give it the best clean possible. The positive thing is, the amplitude is about 50-70 degrees better than what it was before the overhaul :)

Good to see you are making progress. That's looking a lot more healthy and truthful. Were either of the two end stones in the wrong way up, or is the "improvement" just down to having a better contact to the microphone? The microphone is situated under the metal "claw", so it is a good idea to put the crown up against it as you found out for yourself already. The crown transmits the vibrations better than the casing, especially if there's a plastic movement holder in between. Also, adjusting the gain to maximum I find often works to clean up dirty traces.

As it's an automatic, there's a good chance the mainspring is slipping too soon, and you aren't getting a full wind. You say you did't clean the mainspring too well, but (whisper it) they are not really that sensitive to a bit of dirt. There is a lot of energy in there, so contamination will increase wear and tear, but it is unlikely to cost you much amplitude. Did you lubricate the spring and barrel, and if so what with, how much, and where did you apply it? Another possibility is, you are applying too much oil at the escapement end, where a little bit of drag has a big effect.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

Good to see you are making progress. That's looking a lot more healthy and truthful. Were either of the two end stones in the wrong way up, or is the "improvement" just down to having a better contact to the microphone? The microphone is situated under the metal "claw", so it is a good idea to put the crown up against it as you found out for yourself already. The crown transmits the vibrations better than the casing, especially if there's a plastic movement holder in between. Also, adjusting the gain to maximum I find often works to clean up dirty traces.

As it's an automatic, there's a good chance the mainspring is slipping too soon, and you aren't getting a full wind. You say you did't clean the mainspring too well, but (whisper it) they are not really that sensitive to a bit of dirt. There is a lot of energy in there, so contamination will increase wear and tear, but it is unlikely to cost you much amplitude. Did you lubricate the spring and barrel, and if so what with, how much, and where did you apply it? Another possibility is, you are applying too much oil at the escapement end, where a little bit of drag has a big effect.

Thanks for your reply.

Yea for some reason the crown on the claw side caused a ton of noise. It could be a quirk with the design of the 6309/casings as it happened on another similar Seiko as well.

I think the cap jewel fix I did improved amplitude about 10-20 degrees on average, but not sure. Now it is "settled in" at about 220 amplitude even after running for 12 hrs plus. Not the best but not too bad I don't think.

I lubricated the mainspring like so: 

1) run watchpaper with tweezers to get gunk off

2) watchpaper with tweezers dipped in iso to clean

3) dry watchpaper

4) watchpaper with 9010

5) dry watchpaper

I just didnt get alll the gunk off from the entire mainspring

I greased the barrel by applying 8301 to the walls at 4-5 points around the circumference, making sure not to get any on the top of the barrel

To your point about the escapement: I did get a little trigger happy with lubing the pallet jewels. I'm going to take care to be more restrained in my next service. I also will have a closer look at the mechanics of swiss lever escapement to find the precise friction points. I kind of just slathered it on the ends of the jewels imprecisely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pubudeux said:

I greased the barrel by applying 8301 to the walls at 4-5 points around the circumference, making sure not to get any on the top of the barrel

lubrication always such a interesting subject with lots of opinions and views. So 8301 is equaled 8300 which is considered a standard grease not a breaking grease.

2 hours ago, pubudeux said:

watchpaper with 9010

then 9010 is considered a light oil. If the mainsprings renew their considered to be prelubricated no lubrication is required. If you lubricating the mainspring 8200 which is a lighter version of your 8300 is the recommended lubrication. But I have seen people use 8300 for the mainspring itself. Other times they will use a clock oil as it's kind of a compromise between the oil and a grease. Probably better if he used to heavier oil on your mainspring as 9010 is just to light almost like not being there at all.

On the other hand if this works fine for you don't worry about its the rules on lubrication art entirely written in stone and are subject to some interpretation and variations most places.

2 hours ago, pubudeux said:

To your point about the escapement: I did get a little trigger happy with lubing the pallet jewels

escape but lubrication is one of those places where things get more critical. Ideally if you're following Swiss recommendations you're supposed to surface treat some of the components to keep the lubrication from spreading. Especially if you're using an oil. If you use a 9415 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi there Mathew, welcome to the forum.  
    • I often think about painting clear varnish on the coil.
    • I hate this battery release design in Ronda movements. It's an accident waiting to happen. One slip and the coil is gone. I wonder if it's a deliberate design.
    • so let's break this down the words restaffed balance wheel correctly would mean no distortion at all on the balance wheel. Which can be done but often isn't. Oftentimes balance wheels end up and times particularly discussing a bimetallic all bent up like the one in this discussion. If the balance wheel is out of round you definitely get a poise issue. You also get an issue if somebody pleases and out around balance wheel and then you fix the out of round now the wheel is poised incorrectly because somebody didn't physically make sure the balance wheel was correct in the first place. Yes people really do poise balance wheels that are neither flat or round it's quite annoying and then it typically with anything vintage there's an extreme likelihood of timing issues. Like the fun I had yesterday the wall thumb was 400 seconds fast and had a 202nd positional problem. So yes it's extremely common on vintage watches you're going to have things to fix from prior inappropriate repairs typically and it depends upon how it nitpicky you want to be here. In other words if you are statically poising the definition of poised would be if you give the balance wheel of push it will rotate eventually come to a stop and it will not rock back and forth at all is considered perfectly poised. Typically when I poise I don't worry about that I will let it rock back and forth because it still going to be within 15 seconds typically. Now the problem with statically poising absolutely perfectly is that it does not take into account the hairspring. This is why ideally if you are really obsessed you statically poise until your close and then finish with dynamic poising. This will take into account the hairspring collet that's probably not a poised collet. Yes Hamilton had another companies had poised collet's they hairspring itself affects the poise so for absolute perfect you have to dynamic poise. So the suggestion has been that it absolutely poised dynamically done balance wheel will not be statically poise absolutely perfectly.    this is an interesting one? In the United States of America over a time span and I don't remember the exact but it ended in the 60s there was a tear off on watches to protect the American watch industry. I've read the books on the tariffs specifications it would bump up the cost of better watches to making them expensive. This is why you will often see a nice Omega watch for instance that was regulated was adjusted and was still keeping really good time will be marked not adjusted. Because the quantity of jewels each jewel bumped up the cost adjustment adjustment and variety of positions bumped up the cost so a huge percentage of watches imported into this country will be not adjusted but they were adjusted at the factory it's just a terra thing then I suspect that even the cheapest of watches probably were somewhat adjusted because if they had zero adjustments I have no idea how bad the timekeeping would be? It's one of the problems of we don't actually have numbers of what the watches really should be doing we only have numbers of timekeeping basically when timing machines exist or for things like railroad grade watches where they absolutely had to know what the timekeeping is doing. So railroad timekeeping specification in this country is of watch Dependent up has to be within plus or -30/2 per week. Which if you compare it to the specifications of chronometer grade will ask which I think could be up to six seconds a day is better than a Rolex. this is one of my amusements at work. There we have that really nice which he timing machine full automatic microphone we look at every single watch and six positions and my boss once the watches all the keep really good time. So basically the watchmakers have learned to let the boss adjust the watches it seems to make him happy and we can do other things like service watches. So yesterday's fun on the 18 size Waltham to get the 400 timing down to think he got it down to 15 seconds it might've been better than that the Delta was still might've been within a minute much better than what it was before but still took more than an hour of time. When we don't specifically charge for this we charge for servicing of the watch we do not typically charge to make your watch keep time in multiple positions so yes it wastes a lot of time unless you're getting paid for it where it can definitely eat up a lot of time to fix vintage watches that I've had interesting repair histories. sorry I don't remember the brand name we once had a watch that was one of I take 1000 it actually was engraved number or something of something in other words it was a very expensive Swiss watch and I believe there was at least one shim under something. I always think of at the factory level if you have to place a shim to me it's a sign of poor manufacturing but there was a Swiss watch a nice watch that had it done. Of course what it may also be a sign of limited quantity of watches where things or adjusted at the factory we end up with interesting problems and I will pick on American pocket watches again with interesting repairs that can happen? For instance pocket watches dropped balance staff is broken possibly the whole jewels are broken and sometimes cap stones get broken. or worst-case I had a Hamilton 992 it actually had little notches taken out of the main plate I always wonder if it got hit by a train and things were dramatically bent in this watch somebody had ground the pallet fork bridge down to accommodate the balance wheel because the balance bridge had been bent to insane proportions it was bent so much it was no longer up and down in alignment so I always wondered if this particular watch got hit by a train. With its ultimate repair it would've been better to just replace the whole movement but instead we cannibalized another movements to replace all of the horribly mutilated parts. Now back to not watches hit by a train while somebody was crossing the railroad track. If the balance jewels are broken they are replaced but the same problem like we have on this group where do you get replacements? This means people in the field will get creative if they replace things with size differently than the original things will change. In other words the total length of the balance staff conceivably will change because they've changed the jewels and they're not properly sized. Then there's a problem of replacement balance staffs I personally have often theorized in the case of  bestfit  that they deliberately made the staffs oversize so the watchmaker can reduce the size. But what if you don't have a lay then what happens? A for instance the Hamilton 992B only has one balance staff as it's of friction staff but often times the friction staff doesn't fit because the replacement staff is slightly oversize which should be impossible but it happens. Often times I have to go through an assortment of staffs to find one that fits because I don't feel like reducing at the size to fit. More common though would be staffs with pivots that are too long and if the watchmaker does not have a lathe again how do they fix that problem well undesirable for us that have to deal with it down the road so an ideal perfect world the adjusted by the factory to whatever the specification was at the time and on a seven jewel American pocket watch it's not going to be railroad timekeeping. If we replace the staff in a proper fashion without bending or distorting anything the watch should keep time within the specification when it was originally made except of course we don't know what the specification was and they definitely did not have timing machines when this watch was made. If we replace the balanced staff with a factory original factory staff and everything should fit perfectly if the jewels were broken and we used factory jewels everything once again would be perfect. Although if you look in the parts book typically for American pocket watches for certain parts they recommend sending the entire watch or parts of the watch back because American watch manufacturing at least until the not sure exact date but sometime past the 20s definitely by the 50s watches were made in batches which is why everything has a serial number and the tools over the course of the batch tend to wear a little bit. So conceivably something made at the beginning and the end of the batch may not fit without adjustments. Plus of course there's variations in parts I like the pic on Elgin because they have one balance staff that comes in four different size variations and then a whole bunch of pivot variations all with the same part number so yes and an absolute perfect world which doesn't exist changing a balance staff with everything factory new would not require poising or truing the balance wheel because everything should still be perfect. But unfortunately in the 100+ year life of your watch things have happened. If you want to grasp that go back and start on page 1 of this discussion as the balance wheels in this discussion have had issues they're not flat the probably out of round there were issues with the jewels there is issues possibly with the staffs. Oh and yes apparently there's a donor watch and if the donor watch is not within a very close serial number range of the original watch it will have very likely sizing differences especially for anything related to the balance wheel because all the vintage watches were adjusted individually in the factory. If you look at a video on I can find it if you want to watch it on YouTube from I believe the 30s where you will see on escapement related stuff every single watch is adjusted which is why you can't just grab the balance wheel from one watch shove it into another one as they were adjusted at the factory                    
    • I see a lot of URLs pointing to 1drv.com which appears to be a CDN for OneDrive.
×
×
  • Create New...