Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
28 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Datasheet Weasol provided the link to on lemania 5100 includes a diagrams

Are absolutely right my bad the part does exist except minor itsy-bitsy problem Perhaps?

 

On 8/12/2020 at 6:49 AM, east3rn said:

I was luck enough to get a Tissot watch with updated version of the same movement(working fine)

What I'm curious about here is for the second movement updated version what was updated?

 

 

Here's what my problem is we have two versions identical versions even though one was improved? Then we have the silly link below that I Have quoted something out of below the link

https://www.watch-wiki.net/index.php?title=ETA_C01.211

"In 2008, Tissot requested a low-cost mass-produced chronograph movement for entry-level Swiss watches. ETA created this Cal. C01.211 based on the Lemania 5100 design. It was simplified and re-worked to be more attractive, "

The problem with the quote is it doesn't say that this is an exact 100% reproduction of the original. Simplified and reworked especially on a watch can have interesting consequences?

Now back to my original question now that we know the axle part number 1400 is removable perhaps the original poster could give us pictures of that. For one thing this movement was made or could have been made in 2008 and it's conceivable it has wearing issues. This is why showing those pictures of the rotor isn't entirely helpful without a picture of the axle. 

omega 1400 part.JPG

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If the watch is new, just return it to the seller for a refund or replacement.
    • Keevo, Welcome to the group ! I'm thinking that you have some damage to the hour, and/ or minute wheel. Possibly just a bent, otherwise damaged, or missing tooth.   Your photo didn't post that I can see. I think you'll have to open it to start really finding the issue. Best, Randy
    • An industrial break cleaner , like Holts does a good job of rinsing off paraffin 
    • In cap jewels on several watches I have serviced over the years. I've recently serviced a couple of Longines movements where the cap jewels were colourless. They are a real pain. Without colour they disappear when immersed in any liquid for cleaning 😲 Not necessarily. Cousins do a 10ml bottle for £26 which will last me for years. That's just half the price of a simple Bergeon silicone cushion, so not too expensive 🤣
    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
×
×
  • Create New...