Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi again...

 

Started to take apart an old (50’s ?) Stowa Sport and found a movement I can’t id. It looks like the pivot coming through the cannon pinion for the seconds hands is broken off. Will most likely be a challenge to find a replacement but to even try that I need some more details on the movement.

 

I ”think” I have seen something similar on the keyless side before but can’t remember...

 

I suspect it might be a PUW movement as I read that Stowa used these and Durowe during these times. But there’s so many PUW’s on Ranfft that I thought I might take a chance and through out the question on the forum.

 

Photos are attached.

 

8367e409c52d6ba21018afabd4475705.jpg7ff4cba0e5138e212ee6a49523e78336.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

You are definitely on to something here...

Osco is a new brand name to me, never heard of that one before.

I did see the OS 66 stamp on the movement but had nothing to connect it with.

Thanks a lot, now I have a starting point for furthet investigation!




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Osco 66 seems to be the general opinion and I tend to agree.

Just took the movement apart and lucky me, I took some photos of the process. This is not your generic swiss design and I would likely have been lost in the assembly process.

Looks like there are actually parts to have. Cousins are fairly well stocked, at least for the Osco 65 parts that comes up when searching for the 66, so I guess they fit in between these movements.

The movement belongs to a very worn case but the dial is nice with passable yellowish patina, so I’ll try to give the thing a 2nd life.

Thanks again for all help!




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

So far so good...

Movement is up and running decently with amplitude around 250 and close to zero beat error. Currently off by around +20 sec dial up/down so should be tweakable.

Photo as assembled in cleaned and a bit polished casing with new crystal and re-lumed hands is attached.

I guess I will have to get that centersec-wheel and fit a sec hand before the adventure is over...:-)

I like it when a 2,5 euro investment can be turned around to something decent.


1c809502531d9d0809a8d0f8488c6818.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

It seems I was too quick to pat myself on the shoulder here..

After a couple of days wearing and winding the watch, the winding started to hack and slip over.

Taking the rocking bar mechanism out, the problem seems to be that the square part of the winding stem that is supposed to fit in the square hole in the winding pinion is worn down or wrong from start and the stem slips over inside the pinion when you turn the stem to wind.

I attached a photo of the stem fitted inside the pinion and find it hard to believe that there should be that difference between hole and stem size.

Measuring the stem, it’s maybe 0,1 mm undersized relative the nominal for the Ronda 382 that’s supposedly the correct one.

Is it the wrong pinion?

If anyone has experience from similar rocking bar designs, I appreciate any feedback.
1387424cc1ab541410c37068214915da.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

I ended up using a rounded punch on the edges of the pinion in the staking set to close the hole i tiny bit. This prevents the stem from rotating freely in the hole and winding now works ok.

Probably a bit unorthodox and maybe frowned upon...?

But I’d rather have a wearable working watch than chuckng it back in the drawer with the other hopeless cases. :-)






Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Well since the square part of the winding stem almost fits diagonaly in the winding pinion I would lean towards that stem has a error more than 0.1mm. The square hole on the winding pinion looks nice and crisp.
The winding stem is probably not a correct one for this watch, but of course someone can have changed the winding pinion, likely not since it obviously fits in diameter towards the crown wheel on the rocker.

Posted

That’s the strange part. Checked the stem again with micrometer and it’s more like 0,05 mm off the nominal for the specified stem.

I can visually see that the corners of the stem has been worn down slightly right where it touches the wheel.

If there had been less size diff between stem and wheel from start, this would never have happened.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
    • Like these? https://www.watch-tools.de/metal-straps/springbars/assortment-360-strong-spring-bars-beco-inox-o-1-8mm.php  
    • I've seen them on several swiss-made movements as well. Last one was a Tissot if I remember correctly.
    • This thread might be interesting for you:  
    • I've never seen them, then again, I haven't got a ton of experience, but "common"? Really? In what context have you seen them? I'm not questioning you. I am sincerely curious why I've missed it. An alternative to Fixodrop is to apply less oil (no more than 50 % of the circle area). The only downside would be that it would shorten the service interval. More oil will prolong the service interval, but if the movement is subjected to trauma, there's a risk it will be displaced. Fixodrop makes it more stable. Unfortunately, Fixodrop is seriously expensive.
×
×
  • Create New...