Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

Is it necessary to use a recommended Omega tool (as written on the case back), such as "tool 105" or "tool 107" to remove an original Omega crystal and gain access to the movement? Or, can I simply use my Bergeon crystal lift? I have used the Bergeon on other front loading watches (non-Omega) in which the watch's case back recommend the use of a specific tool without any problems. Of course, those crystals were easily replaced (at about $4) should there be an issue. With this Omega watch I'm referencing, the crystal has the Omega logo in its center so I assume it is the original crystal.

Thanks!

Posted

the easiest way to get an answer to the question is try it what's the harm that could happen?

sometimes googling is interesting like next link looks like they doing exactly what you wish to do? Basically Omega has a nice tool to take the crystal off without scratching it up unfortunately we don't all have those nice tools.

http://old-omegas.com/tool107.html

if the crystal has the omega symbol inside that tells you it's a original omega crystal.

1 hour ago, DanB said:

Of course, those crystals were easily replaced (at about $4) should there be an issue

no have to tell us where you do your shopping and you can get GNU one regional crystals at that price as seems really cheap? In case it's a replacement crystal we've discussed these before and vague memory isn't some people think it may not work. It may depend a course on who made the replacement crystal. That also pay attention to the inside metal ring Omega a lot of times has a slightly different shape than the generic one. It becomes more of a problem if the crystal is used to hold the movement in the watch. As opposed to normal crystal with the metal ring which just is a crystal.

Posted

Thanks for the prompt reply. The $4 price refers to generic GS or Stella plastic crystal for a non-Omega watch, more like the crystal one would put on a vintage Hamilton or Bulova.

Posted

Wow, that's a cool method, worth trying just for the fun of it. Then to reinstall probably best to use a crystal press. I've not used one yet, just the Bergeon, but I think it's time to invest in one anyway.

Thanks so much.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
    • Like these? https://www.watch-tools.de/metal-straps/springbars/assortment-360-strong-spring-bars-beco-inox-o-1-8mm.php  
    • I've seen them on several swiss-made movements as well. Last one was a Tissot if I remember correctly.
    • This thread might be interesting for you:  
    • I've never seen them, then again, I haven't got a ton of experience, but "common"? Really? In what context have you seen them? I'm not questioning you. I am sincerely curious why I've missed it. An alternative to Fixodrop is to apply less oil (no more than 50 % of the circle area). The only downside would be that it would shorten the service interval. More oil will prolong the service interval, but if the movement is subjected to trauma, there's a risk it will be displaced. Fixodrop makes it more stable. Unfortunately, Fixodrop is seriously expensive.
×
×
  • Create New...