Jump to content

Sellita SW 220-1 keyless works, don't


BrianB

Recommended Posts

I fear this is going to be a repeat of the "Sellita SW-200-1 Stem SNAFU" thread but I wanted to start my own so as not to highjack firebynight's thread.

I think the universe likes to arrange these little moments just to give me a reality check when I start feeling like I've learned something.

I'm building a watch using a dial, case, hands, movement, etc. that I picked out. Everything has been going together well and I was really happy with the result thus far. The movement is a Sellita SW 220-1 top grade (not that the grade matters here - just had to point out that if I'm going to screw up a movement it might as well be a top grade, right?).

Anyway, I had the whole thing together and was down to the very last step which was to trim the stem to the right length so I could fit the screw-down crown. Who would have thought that this is where it would go off the rails?

I've had problems removing and replacing stems in the past in other movements but with a little fiddling of the stem they always seem to go back together and be happy and function again. I just recently learned the "trick" (I guess it's not a trick, it's just proper procedure) of using a screwdriver blade to push the stem release button as the blade is wider than the button and will pass through the slot, but not "over-press" but button. I figured using this technique my stem-removal issues were behind me.

Before I describe the problem I'd like to recite what I think is the correct technique to r/r the stem so that you all can correct me if I've got it wrong.

Remove:

  1. Pull the stem to the hacked/time-setting position.
  2. Use a screwdriver blade that will fit in the slot, and is wider than the button, to press the button while gently pulling on the crown.
  3. When the button gets to the disengagement point the crown comes out easily.

Replace:

  1. Use your screwdriver blade to push the button in again.
  2. Slip the stem in, rotating as necessary to align the square end with the slot in the sliding clutch.
  3. Release the button and finish inserting the stem until it clicks.

So first, thanks in advance for correcting any of that which may be wrong.

Now, honestly I'm not sure what I did to cause the issue. I think perhaps it is possible that I didn't pull the crown to the hacked/time-setting position first. Maybe I didn't have the button pushed well when I went to put the crown back in. I'm not sure. Whatever I did the issue is that I can push the button and put the stem back in, and when I do the stem secures in place, but you can't push it or pull it. The watch is running and you can't pull the stem to the date change or hacked/time-setting position. If you push the button you can take the stem back out again.

Reading through the "Sellita SW-200-1 Stem SNAFU" thread it seems that its likely that something in the keyless works is not where it should be relative to something else. The most straightforward way to remedy this is to pull the hands and remove the dial, then remove the day wheel, date wheel, jumper retainer, jumper, and minute bridge, to access the keyless works and reset everything in proper orientation (and hope nothing got bent in my pushing and pulling on the stem when I couldn't believe it wouldn't move).

I've done all of the above on an ETA 2824 clone (which of course doesn't have the day wheel, but is otherwise the same), so I feel competent to do that job, but man I really don't want to if it can be avoided.

Given the extra detail of the stem going in and locking in place but not being able to move, is there any hope that this is something that can be reset through the aperture on the edge where you can see the keyless works a bit? Looking through that opening, and comparing what I see to what I see on another SW 220-1 in the various positions, the part of the keyless I can see looks to be in the winding position, but the watch can't be wound - something isn't in engagement and you can feel what is probably the teeth on the sliding clutch just barely touching the teeth on the winding pinion.

Anyway, this got way too long. If the path forward is to just pull the hands and dial and everything else and redo the keyless then that's what I'll do. There was mention of a shortcut video in the other thread but unless I missed it I don't think the link to it got posted.

Thanks in advance for the help. I know we're all new once, but this really makes me feel stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, no guts no glory. I felt stupid for being aggravated with the situation rather than seeing it as an opportunity to improve my knowledge and skills.

I went ahead and jumped into the fix today. Wasn't really that bad at all. I think it took maybe an hour or two. I didn't really pay attention to the time.

Pulling the hands was interesting because I couldn't put the watch in "time set" mode, nor could I hack the movement. I considered waiting until the watch advanced to a time more conducive to removing the hands easily and decided the heck with it - this is a good chance to practice removing hands with levers under less-than-ideal conditions.

After the hands were off I removed the dial and then put the movement in a movement-specific holder for the ETA 2824/36 / SW 200/220. I mention this only because in HSL's excellent walk through to fix this issue (in another thread) he removed the rotor to ensure the movement could be held in a movement holder without interference from the rotor. This was not necessary with the movement-specific holder. 

2020-09-13 01.38.13-1.jpg

Speaking of HSL and his walk-through, my thanks to him for it. I'd taken the date jumper, jumper retainer, date wheel, and minute bridge off of a 2824 before, but the only keyless works I've ever messed with was the 6498 that I did in Mark's classes. HSL's pictures were a great help.

I should have taken pictures of what was messed up with my keyless, but I didn't. Suffice it to say things were not as they should be. I examined each part and found that nothing appeared to be bent or out of sorts.

Then I followed HSL's guide to remove the various keyless works components and reinstall them in the proper arrangement, with the caveat that some of the parts are a little different in the SW 220-1 than the SW 200-1 (owing to the presence of a day wheel in addition to the date wheel.

Reassembly of the remainder was pretty straightforward and went fine though I did the assembly in a slightly different order, using the method I was used to from playing with the 2824 previously. I put the minute bridge on first, then the date wheel, then the date jumper (which is also the day jumper on the 220) and the date jumper maintainer. Then I had to reinstall the day wheel and it's circlip.

The day wheel was slightly tricky just because I've never put one on before, but its jumper works pretty much the same as the date wheel jumper - except you can't see it and you have to catch and compress it by feel.

So now it's all back together and seems happy. All of the functions seem to work fine (winding, rapid day and date advance, and time setting). Having it all back together I lament that I didn't bother to re-lubricate the various parts.

Also, at one point during the reassembly the setting wheel became dislodged - jumping completely out of the movement. I examined it at the time but apparently not closely enough as I concluded there was no difference between the two sides of it. Looking at the technical documentation for the movement I now see that there is indeed a right and a wrong orientation. Damn.

I'm not tearing it back down to find out at this point. Especially since I still have to finish trimming the stem to the right length which means several more removals and re-insertions and the chance that I screw the keyless works up again. If that happens I'll examine the setting wheel and make sure it's right side up, and I'll also lube anything that seems like it needs it.

Anyway, thanks to HSL and this fantastic community for being such a great, supportive resource.

Edited by BrianB
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I'm up late and posting, I'd like to re-post a question I had buried in my OP in this topic. To try to avoid making this mistake again, can someone confirm that this is the correct removal and reinstallation procedure for the stem (or correct me if it's not):

Remove:

  1. Pull the stem to the hacked/time-setting position.
  2. Use a screwdriver blade that will fit in the slot, and is wider than the button, to press the button while gently pulling on the crown.
  3. When the button gets to the disengagement point the crown comes out easily.

Replace:

  1. Use your screwdriver blade to push the button in again.
  2. Slip the stem in, rotating as necessary to align the square end with the slot in the sliding clutch.
  3. Release the button and finish inserting the stem until it clicks.

On the Sellita SW 220-1 I have found that the Bergeon 1.20mm (red) scredriver fits the width of the slot perfectly. Previously (when I messed it up) I had used the 1.00mm (black) screwdriver which is narrower than the slot and may have let me tilt the screwdriver to the side and depress the button further than I should have. Either that or I failed to pull the stem to the time-setting position before removing.

Anyway, thanks in advance for verifying the procedure outlined above!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.00 mm is wide enough hence wont let you push the button further in as you suspect you might have.

Try to get the set lever pin in set position again and proceed with stem insertion.

You can reach the set liver pin through the stem hole by a needle.

Good luck

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/13/2020 at 3:04 AM, BrianB said:

While I'm up late and posting, I'd like to re-post a question I had buried in my OP in this topic. To try to avoid making this mistake again, can someone confirm that this is the correct removal and reinstallation procedure for the stem (or correct me if it's not):

Remove:

  1. Pull the stem to the hacked/time-setting position.
  2. Use a screwdriver blade that will fit in the slot, and is wider than the button, to press the button while gently pulling on the crown.
  3. When the button gets to the disengagement point the crown comes out easily.

Replace:

  1. Use your screwdriver blade to push the button in again.
  2. Slip the stem in, rotating as necessary to align the square end with the slot in the sliding clutch.
  3. Release the button and finish inserting the stem until it clicks.

On the Sellita SW 220-1 I have found that the Bergeon 1.20mm (red) scredriver fits the width of the slot perfectly. Previously (when I messed it up) I had used the 1.00mm (black) screwdriver which is narrower than the slot and may have let me tilt the screwdriver to the side and depress the button further than I should have. Either that or I failed to pull the stem to the time-setting position before removing.

Anyway, thanks in advance for verifying the procedure outlined above!

I'm obviously no expert, but I agree that the 1.2mm is a safer bet than the 1mm. That definitely won't allow you to push further than designed.

Let's see a photo of the finished project!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/15/2020 at 8:05 PM, firebynight said:

I'm obviously no expert, but I agree that the 1.2mm is a safer bet than the 1mm. That definitely won't allow you to push further than designed.

Let's see a photo of the finished project!

Well, I've removed and reinstalled the stem several times now without messing it up, so whatever I'm doing must be OK. Prior to this incident I've never messed one up to the point of requiring me to redo the keyless works, but at least now I've done it once so if I had to do it again I know it's not the end of the world.

Here's the way the watch sits today - well, the picture was actually taken yesterday. :)

BW0-1_IMG_20200916_091238_3_RT_crop_resize.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrianB said:

Well, I've removed and reinstalled the stem several times now without messing it up, so whatever I'm doing must be OK. Prior to this incident I've never messed one up to the point of requiring me to redo the keyless works, but at least now I've done it once so if I had to do it again I know it's not the end of the world.

Here's the way the watch sits today - well, the picture was actually taken yesterday. :)

BW0-1_IMG_20200916_091238_3_RT_crop_resize.png

That's really reassuring to hear! Thanks for the update. I haven't had to get back into another SW-200-1 yet and I'm partly dreading and partly looking forward to the next time! 

So, you're sticking with a 1.2mm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, firebynight said:

So, you're sticking with a 1.2mm?

For these SW220's the 1.2mm seems perfect. As a general rule my plan is to always use the widest screwdriver that will fit the slot. This should make it impossible to push the pin too far.

As far as technique goes, hopefully I've improved my "feel" a bit. Removing and replacing the stem is a lot easier with the movement out of the case, but with it in this particular case, which has a screw down crown and an o-ring in the crown tube that provides some resistance when trying to insert it, it really messes up the feel.

I'm finding that upon reinsertion I push the stem in until I can feel it touch inside, then depress the button, letting the stem move in, then it seems like the stem has to get pushed in pretty far before it catches the setting lever thereby becoming captive (and not just pull back out if pulled on).

Edited by BrianB
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eccentric59 said:

I'll bet dollars to donuts that the yoke jumped the sliding clutch. It's very easy to do with the SW200/ETA2824 movements. Because of the design of these movements, removing the stem requires a very light touch.

I should have taken a picture of it once I got the minute bridge off, but I didn't. I don't know why I didn't. Maybe I didn't have the microscope set up.

I seem to recall that the yoke was still in the sliding clutch groove, but nearly nothing else was as it should be. I think I was just anxious to get it back together so I immediately set about moving everything into the proper relationships and put the covers back on (so to speak).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. When you press the release button that pushes the setting lever down so the stem can be removed, and if the keyless works wasn't in the second position, the sliding clutch has a bit too much wiggle room. Pushing the stem back in, even carefully often times pushes it past the yoke which then gets trapped between the winding pinion and the clutch. 

Of course, a bit too much pressure in the wrong spot could also pop the spring off the setting lever or yoke.

IMG_9607[1].jpg

Edited by eccentric59
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, eccentric59 said:

Interesting. When you press the release button that pushes the setting lever down so the stem can be removed, and if the keyless works wasn't in the second position, the sliding clutch has a bit too much wiggle room. Pushing the stem back in, even carefully often times pushes it past the yoke which then gets trapped between the winding pinion and the clutch. 

Of course, a bit too much pressure in the wrong spot could also pop the spring off the setting lever or yoke.

The setting lever was definitely disengaged from the setting lever jumper. Once I could see the relationships of the parts I think I just said "what a flippin' mess" and started fixing it. I really wish I had stuck it under the microscope and taken a picture first.

That said, your description of the sliding clutch being disengaged from the yoke and the yoke being trapped between the winding pinion and the clutch definitely sounds like how the watch felt when trying to manipulate the stem and/or turn the crown during the malfunction.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi there Mathew, welcome to the forum.  
    • I often think about painting clear varnish on the coil.
    • I hate this battery release design in Ronda movements. It's an accident waiting to happen. One slip and the coil is gone. I wonder if it's a deliberate design.
    • so let's break this down the words restaffed balance wheel correctly would mean no distortion at all on the balance wheel. Which can be done but often isn't. Oftentimes balance wheels end up and times particularly discussing a bimetallic all bent up like the one in this discussion. If the balance wheel is out of round you definitely get a poise issue. You also get an issue if somebody pleases and out around balance wheel and then you fix the out of round now the wheel is poised incorrectly because somebody didn't physically make sure the balance wheel was correct in the first place. Yes people really do poise balance wheels that are neither flat or round it's quite annoying and then it typically with anything vintage there's an extreme likelihood of timing issues. Like the fun I had yesterday the wall thumb was 400 seconds fast and had a 202nd positional problem. So yes it's extremely common on vintage watches you're going to have things to fix from prior inappropriate repairs typically and it depends upon how it nitpicky you want to be here. In other words if you are statically poising the definition of poised would be if you give the balance wheel of push it will rotate eventually come to a stop and it will not rock back and forth at all is considered perfectly poised. Typically when I poise I don't worry about that I will let it rock back and forth because it still going to be within 15 seconds typically. Now the problem with statically poising absolutely perfectly is that it does not take into account the hairspring. This is why ideally if you are really obsessed you statically poise until your close and then finish with dynamic poising. This will take into account the hairspring collet that's probably not a poised collet. Yes Hamilton had another companies had poised collet's they hairspring itself affects the poise so for absolute perfect you have to dynamic poise. So the suggestion has been that it absolutely poised dynamically done balance wheel will not be statically poise absolutely perfectly.    this is an interesting one? In the United States of America over a time span and I don't remember the exact but it ended in the 60s there was a tear off on watches to protect the American watch industry. I've read the books on the tariffs specifications it would bump up the cost of better watches to making them expensive. This is why you will often see a nice Omega watch for instance that was regulated was adjusted and was still keeping really good time will be marked not adjusted. Because the quantity of jewels each jewel bumped up the cost adjustment adjustment and variety of positions bumped up the cost so a huge percentage of watches imported into this country will be not adjusted but they were adjusted at the factory it's just a terra thing then I suspect that even the cheapest of watches probably were somewhat adjusted because if they had zero adjustments I have no idea how bad the timekeeping would be? It's one of the problems of we don't actually have numbers of what the watches really should be doing we only have numbers of timekeeping basically when timing machines exist or for things like railroad grade watches where they absolutely had to know what the timekeeping is doing. So railroad timekeeping specification in this country is of watch Dependent up has to be within plus or -30/2 per week. Which if you compare it to the specifications of chronometer grade will ask which I think could be up to six seconds a day is better than a Rolex. this is one of my amusements at work. There we have that really nice which he timing machine full automatic microphone we look at every single watch and six positions and my boss once the watches all the keep really good time. So basically the watchmakers have learned to let the boss adjust the watches it seems to make him happy and we can do other things like service watches. So yesterday's fun on the 18 size Waltham to get the 400 timing down to think he got it down to 15 seconds it might've been better than that the Delta was still might've been within a minute much better than what it was before but still took more than an hour of time. When we don't specifically charge for this we charge for servicing of the watch we do not typically charge to make your watch keep time in multiple positions so yes it wastes a lot of time unless you're getting paid for it where it can definitely eat up a lot of time to fix vintage watches that I've had interesting repair histories. sorry I don't remember the brand name we once had a watch that was one of I take 1000 it actually was engraved number or something of something in other words it was a very expensive Swiss watch and I believe there was at least one shim under something. I always think of at the factory level if you have to place a shim to me it's a sign of poor manufacturing but there was a Swiss watch a nice watch that had it done. Of course what it may also be a sign of limited quantity of watches where things or adjusted at the factory we end up with interesting problems and I will pick on American pocket watches again with interesting repairs that can happen? For instance pocket watches dropped balance staff is broken possibly the whole jewels are broken and sometimes cap stones get broken. or worst-case I had a Hamilton 992 it actually had little notches taken out of the main plate I always wonder if it got hit by a train and things were dramatically bent in this watch somebody had ground the pallet fork bridge down to accommodate the balance wheel because the balance bridge had been bent to insane proportions it was bent so much it was no longer up and down in alignment so I always wondered if this particular watch got hit by a train. With its ultimate repair it would've been better to just replace the whole movement but instead we cannibalized another movements to replace all of the horribly mutilated parts. Now back to not watches hit by a train while somebody was crossing the railroad track. If the balance jewels are broken they are replaced but the same problem like we have on this group where do you get replacements? This means people in the field will get creative if they replace things with size differently than the original things will change. In other words the total length of the balance staff conceivably will change because they've changed the jewels and they're not properly sized. Then there's a problem of replacement balance staffs I personally have often theorized in the case of  bestfit  that they deliberately made the staffs oversize so the watchmaker can reduce the size. But what if you don't have a lay then what happens? A for instance the Hamilton 992B only has one balance staff as it's of friction staff but often times the friction staff doesn't fit because the replacement staff is slightly oversize which should be impossible but it happens. Often times I have to go through an assortment of staffs to find one that fits because I don't feel like reducing at the size to fit. More common though would be staffs with pivots that are too long and if the watchmaker does not have a lathe again how do they fix that problem well undesirable for us that have to deal with it down the road so an ideal perfect world the adjusted by the factory to whatever the specification was at the time and on a seven jewel American pocket watch it's not going to be railroad timekeeping. If we replace the staff in a proper fashion without bending or distorting anything the watch should keep time within the specification when it was originally made except of course we don't know what the specification was and they definitely did not have timing machines when this watch was made. If we replace the balanced staff with a factory original factory staff and everything should fit perfectly if the jewels were broken and we used factory jewels everything once again would be perfect. Although if you look in the parts book typically for American pocket watches for certain parts they recommend sending the entire watch or parts of the watch back because American watch manufacturing at least until the not sure exact date but sometime past the 20s definitely by the 50s watches were made in batches which is why everything has a serial number and the tools over the course of the batch tend to wear a little bit. So conceivably something made at the beginning and the end of the batch may not fit without adjustments. Plus of course there's variations in parts I like the pic on Elgin because they have one balance staff that comes in four different size variations and then a whole bunch of pivot variations all with the same part number so yes and an absolute perfect world which doesn't exist changing a balance staff with everything factory new would not require poising or truing the balance wheel because everything should still be perfect. But unfortunately in the 100+ year life of your watch things have happened. If you want to grasp that go back and start on page 1 of this discussion as the balance wheels in this discussion have had issues they're not flat the probably out of round there were issues with the jewels there is issues possibly with the staffs. Oh and yes apparently there's a donor watch and if the donor watch is not within a very close serial number range of the original watch it will have very likely sizing differences especially for anything related to the balance wheel because all the vintage watches were adjusted individually in the factory. If you look at a video on I can find it if you want to watch it on YouTube from I believe the 30s where you will see on escapement related stuff every single watch is adjusted which is why you can't just grab the balance wheel from one watch shove it into another one as they were adjusted at the factory                    
    • I see a lot of URLs pointing to 1drv.com which appears to be a CDN for OneDrive.
×
×
  • Create New...