Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good evening, everyone and, hopefully, you are all well.

I have successfully stripped, cleaned, and reassembled an ETA 7750 automatic chronograph. It has superb time keeping abilities now, as shown  on my timegrapher, in four positions. Ok, that's lovely. 

Now, to the nitty gritty.

I bought a new bearing to replace the sloppy old one and, no matter how I try, the new bearing just will not go into the oscillating weight.

It is a friction fit type, not the one that uses the Bergeon tool.

Also, I got the bearing from Cousins, not China.

Now, I am wondering if there is a difference between an ETA 7750 watch and  Valjoux 7750.

If there is, that may be the answer because I just cannot keep trying to line this bearing up with the oscillating weight and tapping away at it because, to use a technicle term, 'something will go for a Burton'!

So, has anyone got any idea about how to complete this task?

I have watched Mark's video and that does not help.

I have tried warming the oscillating weight first, but it cools faster than the tax man helping himself to my earnings!

Okey-dokey, over to you.

Thanks for reading this and all the best.

Len.

 

 

 

IMG_4610.JPG

IMG_4612.JPG

Posted
2 minutes ago, Len33 said:

If there is, that may be the answer because I just cannot keep trying to line this bearing up with the oscillating weight and tapping away at it because, to use a technicle term, 'something will go for a Burton'!

Can you measure bearing and hole. A decent digital caliper will be enough. 

Posted

Good evening, JDM.

Thank you for your suggestion.

Yes I did try to do that and, although it was very difficult, I do think that there was gnats whisker larger with the new bearing.

That is why I am wondering about the two models.

Regards.

Len.

 

Posted

Yes they might be even totaly different in construction. I took a picture so you easier can see what I mean.
Newer ETA 7750 is locked in place by a shim and need a special tool.
Old Valjoux 7750 is press fitted.
These boths systems have different diameters on the bearing hole on the oscillating weight too.
So the Valjoux is smaller and will not stay in the newer oscillators hole.
The ETA has a larger diameter and will not go into the Valjoux ocillators hole.
Hope this helps.
7750.thumb.jpg.055c46407d81a1eabf03614014395515.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you for this information, it helps very much.

If I have understood this correctly, it would seem that I have an ETA  7500 bearing and, for some reason, a Valjoux 7500 weight.

The bearing that I got from Cousins will not press into the weight.

The one that I removed, did.

The watch I have, is definitely a 17 jewel ETA 7500.

In your picture, the bearing on the right looks like the one I removed from 

the oscillating weight and the one on the left looks like the one I got from Cousins.

Anyway, "thanks" again for your post.

Len.

 

 

Posted

If you have the 17 Jewel you have the right oscillating weight. Since ETA took over the production they had the old equipment and drawings too. So, just looking at your oscillating weight you can see it is missing the shallow groove for the locking shim which is on the 25 jewel one.  The 17 jewel version of the 7750 is the one to the right in my picture.

The pressfitt bearing is like 2 tens of a milimeter smaller in diameter. 
Easiest way to determine if you got the right bearing is to meassure the hole you got on the oscillating weight and on the small flange on the bearing. If you look at your last picture it is the small bit peaking up you see on the bearing to the right.
If the part you got isn't completely circular but got four straight edges on the flange like it looks to be on the bearing to the left in your picture, then you for sure know it is the wrong bearing, that one is for the 25 Jewel one.

Posted
1 hour ago, HSL said:

If you have the 17 Jewel you have the right oscillating weight. Since ETA took over the production they had the old equipment and drawings too. So, just looking at your oscillating weight you can see it is missing the shallow groove for the locking shim which is on the 25 jewel one.  The 17 jewel version of the 7750 is the one to the right in my picture.

The pressfitt bearing is like 2 tens of a milimeter smaller in diameter. 
Easiest way to determine if you got the right bearing is to meassure the hole you got on the oscillating weight and on the small flange on the bearing. If you look at your last picture it is the small bit peaking up you see on the bearing to the right.
If the part you got isn't completely circular but got four straight edges on the flange like it looks to be on the bearing to the left in your picture, then you for sure know it is the wrong bearing, that one is for the 25 Jewel one.

The new bearing that I have from Cousins, has indeed got the four flat bits that you mention. 

Incidentally, the bearing on the right of my pictures is the old one.

So that confirms I have the wrong bearing.

I have searched the internet for the press fit one (No flat bits) and, so far, I have drawn a blank.

 

 

IMG_4610.JPG

IMG_4612.JPG



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Web sites are cheap. Message board are easy. Hosting both is less than 100 usd a year and small advertising would cover most of that.  In the discord group we did some 15 min poc and threw up a couple of different message boards on a domain i host.   The real value is the data / information / hive mind While I'm a rank amateur in watch repair the information and assistance on this board is invaluable. The members on here are friendly, entertaining and a wealth of knowledge This is what needs to be preserved  --Jeff
    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
    • Hi there, welcome here.  
    • yes the advertising revenue should generate money. The question is how much money? Then as far as the cost of the website goes that's relatively easy to determine? all you would have to do to grasp costs and profitability would be to go to the link below and you can actually get a website for free try it out for free I believe you get no advertising initially. They also talk about that they'll help you out they have marketing tools and some sort of paid subscription or something. So I guess were shopping for a whatever just ask them what would a maybe could use this one as an example in other words it's going to look basically identical to this is going to have advertising a paid subscriptions what's it going to cost? After all they want to sell or give us a message board like this they should bill answer the questions as they're the people who did the software for this. Yes they really said you can have a free discussion group at least to start. https://invisioncommunity.com/ I was curious about the monthly supporter thing where exactly do we find that on this message board? A quick search I'm not finding it so obviously I'm not looking in the right place?
×
×
  • Create New...