Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

In a very know site of trades, I found for sale a 7750 Valjoux movement. The photos show the movement and this one:

 

$_57.JPG

 

The seller in the description say: The movement is in excellent condition and works perfectly !!!

 

In my opinion (if I can read correctly the timer graphic), it have some problem at the escapement weel or in the followed weel.

 

Am I correct or not? Some other opinion?

 

 

Posted

Looks OK to me - but of course they are only showing the one position. I see no evidence of an issue with the escape wheel based on that reading.

Posted (edited)

Agree with the Mark. It looks nice. Of curiosity what do you read is wrong?

 

Morten

Edited by MortenS
Posted

Well, in my opinion (I can be wrong, that's why my question) the periodically split of both lines show some problem in some tooth of scapment weel or in the followed weel (may be a bent weel). Anyway, if it is OK, why this periodic split? Why not a continuous line?

As I said, I can be wrong, but if I service one movement and it shows that graphic, I will search a little more for what is causing this kind of hiccup.

 

Ricardo

Posted

The timing machine is showing two lines. When the watch is perfectly in beat they overlap and appear to be one line. What you are seeing is slight fluctuations in the beat which is very very minimal and not something to be concerned about.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

The problem you're seeing is a problem with digital displays for timing machines. So a confusing description you see one line because it's in beat. The digital numeric display indicates that your watche is running one second fast that means the line is going to have to slope upward by a very tiny amount. So the degree of the angle is so tiny the graphical display can't show it so instead it shows it being absolutely flat then a transition where you see the one in zero pixels weird staircase effect sometimes that it shifts up by one pixel to tell you it's going fast.

 

This is one of the irritating characteristics of a digital machine versus the paper tape machine is the difference between one and zero always give that weird pattern of some fashion. The solution for a watch like this is to switch to a timing machine that has a resolution of +-99 Versus your current machine which has a resolution of +-999 seconds. Then much more expensive timing machine such as witschi you can change the magnification on the screen and expand the lines but you still stuck with the pixels you'll never get it absolutely perfect linear display unless you have super tiny pixels.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Very well explained JohnR.

Excellent information Morten.

:)

Edited by Geo
Posted (edited)

The problem you're seeing is a problem with digital displays for timing machines. So a confusing description you see one line because it's in beat. The digital numeric display indicates that your watche is running one second fast that means the line is going to have to slope upward by a very tiny amount. So the degree of the angle is so tiny the graphical display can't show it so instead it shows it being absolutely flat then a transition where you see the one in zero pixels weird staircase effect sometimes that it shifts up by one pixel to tell you it's going fast.

 

This is one of the irritating characteristics of a digital machine versus the paper tape machine is the difference between one and zero always give that weird pattern of some fashion. The solution for a watch like this is to switch to a timing machine that has a resolution of +-99 Versus your current machine which has a resolution of +-999 seconds. Then much more expensive timing machine such as witschi you can change the magnification on the screen and expand the lines but you still stuck with the pixels you'll never get it absolutely perfect linear display unless you have super tiny pixels.

 

Nice John, and good explanation. I have a B200 and the lines as you said, are continuos. As I don't have (yet) a digital timer, didn't cross my mind that is a problem of resolution of display. As Morten, I try to analyze the graphics. It can show more than we believe.

Thanks for all.

Edited by RicardoG
Posted

Interesting read , I have a cheapo time grapher and have tried to find info on how to interprete the results. Do you have any more info like that morten?

Posted

Could it also be feature of the sampling period set for the timer and the accuracy of a budget timergraph.  Maybe short period is set.  Would setting to longer period give a longer steady line?

Posted (edited)

Thanks Mark just the sort of thing i was after , unfortunately mine came with no idea of what the varied results meant and i couldn't really find anything on the web

Edited by Andyclient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If the watch is new, just return it to the seller for a refund or replacement.
    • Keevo, Welcome to the group ! I'm thinking that you have some damage to the hour, and/ or minute wheel. Possibly just a bent, otherwise damaged, or missing tooth.   Your photo didn't post that I can see. I think you'll have to open it to start really finding the issue. Best, Randy
    • An industrial break cleaner , like Holts does a good job of rinsing off paraffin 
    • In cap jewels on several watches I have serviced over the years. I've recently serviced a couple of Longines movements where the cap jewels were colourless. They are a real pain. Without colour they disappear when immersed in any liquid for cleaning 😲 Not necessarily. Cousins do a 10ml bottle for £26 which will last me for years. That's just half the price of a simple Bergeon silicone cushion, so not too expensive 🤣
    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
×
×
  • Create New...