Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just got this yesterday. It's the forth micro rotor I have, all different. But this one may be a bad omen. Hamilton cal. 666 movement :crazysmile:

 

post-674-0-06004800-1426030761_thumb.jpg

 

post-674-0-66219600-1426030831_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

That is nice, I do like micro-rotors.

Me too, I've got a Hammy and a Buren. Both still to be serviced, but keeping good time. :)

Posted

Never owned or serviced one. Are they efficient with the autowinding when serviced? I am curious as normally the auto,s have a large rotor I presume because a heaver rotor, rotates more efficiently than a light rotor.

Posted (edited)

Never owned or serviced one. Are they efficient with the autowinding when serviced? I am curious as normally the auto,s have a large rotor I presume because a heaver rotor, rotates more efficiently than a light rotor.

Hi CB.

There is a lot of information on the net that well describes the pR os and cons of these movements better than I could.

What I will say is when wearing one on a daily basis I could not personally tell the difference between a micro rotor and an ordinary rotor, apart from the thickness of the watch. Mine both work fine, and when left overnight enough power reserve to be put back on my wrist without extra winding.

Edited by Geo
Posted

I have read somewhere that in some of the higher end incarnations of these movements the question of winding efficiency with the smaller rotor is addressed by making it out of pure gold to increase its mass. This has also been done in some of the top end full rotor autos though, and there are quite a lot of expensive M/R autos without gold rotors, so either the impact was too low to justify the cost, or it was just another marketing gimmick along the lines of the jewel count. 

Posted

It may be a devil to work on! Nice movement. Mark has a service posted for a similar one I believe. I still have to get my hands on one!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If the watch is new, just return it to the seller for a refund or replacement.
    • Keevo, Welcome to the group ! I'm thinking that you have some damage to the hour, and/ or minute wheel. Possibly just a bent, otherwise damaged, or missing tooth.   Your photo didn't post that I can see. I think you'll have to open it to start really finding the issue. Best, Randy
    • An industrial break cleaner , like Holts does a good job of rinsing off paraffin 
    • In cap jewels on several watches I have serviced over the years. I've recently serviced a couple of Longines movements where the cap jewels were colourless. They are a real pain. Without colour they disappear when immersed in any liquid for cleaning 😲 Not necessarily. Cousins do a 10ml bottle for £26 which will last me for years. That's just half the price of a simple Bergeon silicone cushion, so not too expensive 🤣
    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
×
×
  • Create New...