Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was inspecting the jewels in a Seiko 7019 and noticed a couple of them were very rough and pitted. Here is an example, the escape wheel main plate jewel. I was very thorough in cleaning it to the point where I removed it from the main plate to scrub it harder! :)

Does anyone know what causes something like this to happen?

20201115_113115.thumb.jpg.4c6e8f7c0646d11367cf3a97d54dbf42.jpg

 

20201115_112634.thumb.jpg.4556f8bcb047a789686ed99c4b406348.jpg

Posted (edited)

As the bearing of the jewel to the pivot is the central hole and the immediate surface around it, the outer edge condition can possibly be like this?
Price vs quality?

I’m a newbie by the way, so take my comment as exactly that. Just a comment. ? 

Edited by Michael1962
Posted

Hi  If the finished portion (bearing surface ) is in good condition, no cracks/chips the outer surface is irrelevant, I may have been finished in that condition or it may be that some lubrication/ cleaning agent has reacted with it but as the brearing surface is ok I would suspect the former.

  • Like 1
Posted

Michael1962 and Watchweasol,

Thanks for your replies. The inner hole portion is in good condition as well as the back side where the cap jewel rests. Really, all surfaces are mirror smooth aside from the flat side. I first wondered about chemical damage but other jewels and the pivots look okay.

That was my guess as well; just what you get with a cheap movement. The pivot looks good after all these years so, I believe you're right, this is likely irrelevant.

Thanks again!

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To add to this unusual cleaning idea, there is another type of device whereby the internal spinning parts that move through the fluid are not physically connected to the motor.  The internal whisk is propelled via a magnetic connection, so no damaged gaskets due to solvent contamination. 
    • This is a method that Jon uses, and has posted a video of performing it somewhere .
    • Did you watch the whole video? Once Alex has set the stud, he first corrects the best error, then checks that the hairspring coils are breathing concentrically, then turns the stud to centre the hairspring between the open regulator pins.  He then checks that the regulator can traverse the terminal curve without disturbing the hairspring. A correction is needed, which he performs.  He then reinstalls the balance and re-centres the hairspring between the regulator pins, and verifies that the regulator traverses the terminal curve without disturbing the hairspring.  Finally, he demonstrates how to close the gap between pins.  He then recaps the whole process, fleshing out more detail. If you follow this process, you have correctly set up the regulator pins, and are ready to set the rate of the watch.  If you are interested in learning more about the effects of the regulator pin spacing on positional rates etc, you can read any literature regarding regulator pins. The etachron system makes adjusting beat, centering the hairspring between the regulator pins and adjusting the gap between the pins very convenient, but the same rules that apply to old style regulator pins apply to the etachron system.  This video explains the basics :    I hope that helps, Mark
    • Some photos of the angles you are talking about, and the changes you are seeing to coil spacing etc. would be really useful. Part of your problem could be that you are closing the pins too far and pinching the hairspring. Adjusting the pin separation should not affect amplitude. Nor should it change the coil separation.
    • Did you try it on a Rolex ref. 16600 specifically? Congrats on the nice condition of the movement in your watch. Even so, remember to check the rotor play or those marks around the main plate may start to build up.
×
×
  • Create New...