Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 6/0 waltam wrist watch that I just found at a thrift store.  I have disassambled and serviced it, however, it has a broken mainspring.

Width is 1.521mm, thickness is .115 mm and the length is 308mm or about 12"

Cas-Ker has what looks like 2 options differing in only dennison strength.  After some reading, it appers the dennsion strength is a measuremnt of the thickness of a mainspring. That thickness is proportional to the inner diameter of the going barrel.  Either I will need to get a measurement of my going barrel to figure out the dennison strength, or I just order the 10-3/8 over the 11 since this is a 17j movement and probaly doesn't need the strongest mainspring.

What mainspring should I choose and why?

A couple of pics.  So far, I am enjoying working on Waltam movements. This one was a breeze getting the wheel bridge and the barrel bridge lined up and in place. 

20201119_191659.jpg

20201119_142144.jpg

Screen Shot 2020-11-19 at 8.20.51 PM.png

Screen Shot 2020-11-19 at 8.21.33 PM.png

Posted

And the image below is more evidence that Waltham specified two different strength springs for your model.

Your movement came in 17 and 21 jewel varieties and my take is that to compensate for any slightly greater frictional load in the 17 jewel variety, Waltham specified a slightly greater strength over that for the 21 jewel. The stronger (thicker) variety is the one I would opt for.

image.png.f495cac00d37749428c048ca6337002e.png

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To add to this unusual cleaning idea, there is another type of device whereby the internal spinning parts that move through the fluid are not physically connected to the motor.  The internal whisk is propelled via a magnetic connection, so no damaged gaskets due to solvent contamination. 
    • This is a method that Jon uses, and has posted a video of performing it somewhere .
    • Did you watch the whole video? Once Alex has set the stud, he first corrects the best error, then checks that the hairspring coils are breathing concentrically, then turns the stud to centre the hairspring between the open regulator pins.  He then checks that the regulator can traverse the terminal curve without disturbing the hairspring. A correction is needed, which he performs.  He then reinstalls the balance and re-centres the hairspring between the regulator pins, and verifies that the regulator traverses the terminal curve without disturbing the hairspring.  Finally, he demonstrates how to close the gap between pins.  He then recaps the whole process, fleshing out more detail. If you follow this process, you have correctly set up the regulator pins, and are ready to set the rate of the watch.  If you are interested in learning more about the effects of the regulator pin spacing on positional rates etc, you can read any literature regarding regulator pins. The etachron system makes adjusting beat, centering the hairspring between the regulator pins and adjusting the gap between the pins very convenient, but the same rules that apply to old style regulator pins apply to the etachron system.  This video explains the basics :    I hope that helps, Mark
    • Some photos of the angles you are talking about, and the changes you are seeing to coil spacing etc. would be really useful. Part of your problem could be that you are closing the pins too far and pinching the hairspring. Adjusting the pin separation should not affect amplitude. Nor should it change the coil separation.
    • Did you try it on a Rolex ref. 16600 specifically? Congrats on the nice condition of the movement in your watch. Even so, remember to check the rotor play or those marks around the main plate may start to build up.
×
×
  • Create New...