Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi all,

I am attempting to time a Wittnauer / Revue 73 manual-wind movement. It's meant to be a Christmas gift to my sister, so time is pressing.

After servicing, the watch runs decently with good amplitude. I've put the watch in beat visually, but the problem is that the timegrapher is telling me the watch is badly out of beat. However, the trace on the screen actually suggests it's not very out of beat at all. I also distrust the timegrapher amplitude reading, although I looked up the lift angle and set it at the "correct" 52 degrees.

What should I trust - the number on the machine, or my own eyes (and ears)? Many thanks. Photo attached.

IMG_20201202_220307851.jpg

Edited by JohnC
Posted

more than likely the numeric display is correct for the beat error. We've had this discussion somewhere in the discussion group this particular machine has a minor issue. The graphical display isn't big enough to actually show the maximum the machine can read of 9.9 ms. basically the graphical display is magnified so at around 4 ms I think it basically rolls over. So the lines can be close together as the number gets bigger and graphically it looks great but numerically it looks bad. Another problem with all of the timing machines is with amplitude if the amplitude is too low to read the wrong part of the waveform and a look much nicer than it really is. Then a course if you in a noisy signal that screws up everything he gives you very peculiar feedings.

Then helpful in these situations or basically good practice always look at your watch in more than one position. So you wind the watch up letter run around 30 minutes to stabilize. Time it dial-up then dial down and the wristwatch crown down would be good. Then give us pictures of all three of those.

Visually when you put the watch in beat what were you looking at? Then did you change the mainspring?

Posted

Thanks @JohnR725 and good call. I always get heart palpitations whenever I have to manually adjust the beat, so I really did not want to do it. My usual practice is to line the regulator pins up with the pivot jewels. Then I remove the balance and with the assembly upside-down, note where the stud should be in order to line up the impulse jewel with the curb pin. That said, I don't like doing it because I've had quite a few tragic slip-ups with the screwdriver.

That said, this time no screw-ups. Got it down to about 0.2, which is more luck than skill. Amplitude looks about 300, which is what the timegrapher says. Positional error is a little much, which could be a hairspring issue or a heavy spot on the wheel. Max 0.3 change in beat error between dial up, pendant down, and pendant left (12 down). I think I'm gonna call this one done!

Posted (edited)

Hello JonhC, also as well as above answer make sure you have no other working watches on the bench or near the machine. You would be very suprized how sensitive these machines are, and it will throw your readings 

 

Edited by Graziano
  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is a method described in the watch repair book of Mark W. Wiles. Don‘t hammer, just tap very gently!
    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
×
×
  • Create New...