Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I purchased this interesting caliber 1481 Omega watch style 166.0123

This morning i pulled out the winding stem to set the time and the stem just came out in my hand.  I pushed the stem back in, set the time, then pushed it in completely.  I figured the set screw was loose.

So i get to my shop, finish up the work im doing and then I wanted to open up this creature and tighten the setting lever  screw (if there is one).

The case is the weirdest ive come across so far (see pictures).  There are two flat strips of steel that one pushes out on either side and the movement comes out, crystal and all.  

The picture you see with the winding stem removed is from the seller.  When i pushed in the sem this morning i felt it click.  This afternoon i cannot pull it back out completely.  It looks to me that this watch should have a two part stem but it does not.

I have use about as much force as i feel comfortable pulling on the stem.  I am not about to remove the movement completely until the stem is out, of course.  

Any suggestions as to how this is disassembled?

Thanks, steve

Screenshot_20201213-152215_eBay.jpg

20201213_141332.jpg

IMG_20201208_193059_084.jpg

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Orologi67 said:

It looks to me that this watch should have a two part stem but it does not.

You maybe absolutely right about two part stem. Check CousinsUK parts list for this caliber and you will see options:

- Stem, Male Inner ( 1159 ), Omega 1480

- Tap 9 Female Stem Extension

- Tap 9 Female Stem Extension (No Shoulder)

https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/filter/omega-movement-parts

 

Edited by Poljot
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Ok i figured it out.  There is no setting lever screw.  It is kept in place with a bracket.  

I researched online and some of these 1480 series have dials that are pressed on and there are no dial mounting screws.

So i took a chance and removed the hands, gently pried off the dial which was very slightly friction fit, and voila!  The stem is removed from the front after one takes off the date ring.

20201214_112343.jpg

20201214_120511.jpg

Edited by Orologi67
Posted
1 hour ago, Orologi67 said:

Ok i figured it out.  There is no setting lever screw.  It is kept in place with a bracket.  

I researched online and some of these 1480 series have dials that are pressed on and there are no dial mounting screws.

So i took a chance and removed the hands, gently pried off the dial which was very slightly friction fit, and voila!  The stem is removed from the front after one takes off the date ring

My research indicated you're supposed to have a split stem with this number 081ST9992 That's the Omega number. Then a lot of Omega watches have dials the press on that doesn't mean you're supposed to remove your watch by disassembling them from the front side. Helpful though if you're having a problem but that's not the purpose.

Then I found someone else having a discussion about a watch like yours.

https://omegaforums.net/threads/split-stem-for-cal-1481.18126/

 

  • Like 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

"Then a lot of Omega watches have dials the press on that doesn't mean you're supposed to remove your watch by disassembling them from the front side. Helpful though if you're having a problem but that's not the purpose."

Just because it was not supposed to be disassembled in the sequence i used doesnt mean that one cant do it that way.  I accomplished 2 things by doing it the way i described.  I successfully removed the incorrect stem and i did not damage any parts in the process.

Yes it needs a split stem.  And yes i solved the problem.  Seems like youre giving me grief for not following protocol.  

20 years of clock repair has taught me to think outside of the box when disassembling. 

 

 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you!
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...