Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone, I have just visited the Cousin's parts website to purchase a chronograph centre seconds hand. They state the length and the tube size they stock but not a height size. The tube height I need is 1 mm, am I missing something? They have a height size for ordinary seconds hands.

Regards.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Pedro said:

Hi everyone, I have just visited the Cousin's parts website to purchase a chronograph centre seconds hand. They state the length and the tube size they stock but not a height size. The tube height I need is 1 mm, am I missing something? They have a height size for ordinary seconds hands.

Regards.

I believe there are only two options: with or without the tube. Tube height should not vary.

Posted

My assumption is based on my previous project with 1973-ish automatic Timex :-).

There were two options listed for the Central Second Hand (no-no-no, it's not a Chronograph ??

- with tube (no length variations)

- tubeless

Posted

The Chronograph is a 'Lea' mechanical which I just received today, I think it's from the 1940's. I will post some pics tomorrow morning. The original centre seconds hand is a bit loose so when the fly back button is pressed it doesn't quite return to top dead centre...a couple of seconds to the right or left depending which side of the dial the hand is located when the return button is pressed. I would rather keep the original as a brand new hand would look out of place. Is the tube height a standard length for all vintage mechanical chronograph's? As I said I will post pics tomorrow.

Regards

Posted
11 minutes ago, Pedro said:

The Chronograph is a 'Lea' mechanical which I just received today, I think it's from the 1940's. I will post some pics tomorrow morning. The original centre seconds hand is a bit loose so when the fly back button is pressed it doesn't quite return to top dead centre...a couple of seconds to the right or left depending which side of the dial the hand is located when the return button is pressed. I would rather keep the original as a brand new hand would look out of place. Is the tube height a standard length for all vintage mechanical chronograph's? As I said I will post pics tomorrow.

Regards

It sounds as you simply need to remove the central hand, align it properly and press down carefully. You may, which i doubt at this point, need to tighten the tube slightly if it's lose. This will require some skills and basic tools as it is so easy to crash the tube if you use too much force. Replacing the tube is very challenging for majority of hobbyists (that would be me ? )

Posted
19 minutes ago, Poljot said:

It sounds as you simply need to remove the central hand, align it properly and press down carefully. You may, which i doubt at this point, need to tighten the tube slightly if it's lose. This will require some skills and basic tools as it is so easy to crash the tube if you use too much force. Replacing the tube is very challenging for majority of hobbyists (that would be me ? )

Hi Poljot, thanks for the reply, I did remove the hand  and aligned it and then tested it and it returned to top dead centre if the hand was positioned at about ten seconds either side to the 12 O'clock marker. Any more than that and the power of the flyback would shift the seconds hand slightly out of alignment, so I believe the centre seconds hand tube has become slightly worn and is unable to to withstand the force. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Pedro said:

Hi Poljot, thanks for the reply, I did remove the hand  and aligned it and then tested it and it returned to top dead centre if the hand was positioned at about ten seconds either side to the 12 O'clock marker. Any more than that and the power of the flyback would shift the seconds hand slightly out of alignment, so I believe the centre seconds hand tube has become slightly worn and is unable to to withstand the force. 

You maybe right as there are two possible scenarios in my opinion:

a. tube ID is slightly larger than it used to be. In this case you can simply squeeze it a tiny bit (this would be a suitable tool for this task https://www.watchmaterial.com/bergeon-5679-pin-vice-stem-holder/ )

b. you did not push the Central Hand deep enough. Push it gently down right in the centre using proper tool or a sharp pegwood (do not use tweezers or you will leave scratches) 

Edited by Poljot
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I will go for option a. I want to keep the watch as original. All the hands are coppered coloured wether by design or age. Replacing the centre seconds hand with a brand new shiny gold finish from Cousins would ruin it. Many thanks.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Pedro said:

I will go for option a. I want to keep the watch as original. All the hands are coppered coloured wether by design or age. Replacing the centre seconds hand with a brand new shiny gold finish from Cousins would ruin it. Many thanks.

You are very welcome and good luck!

You may want to take and share a good photo showing the bottom of the second hand tube and another one showing if pivot is worn.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Some pics of the watch. Still don't know if I buy a new centre seconds hand from Cousins if the tube lengths are all the same. This one is 1mm long.

_20201218_102740.JPG

_20201218_102809.JPG

_20201218_103131.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi,

look carefully at your tube: if it is cracked, it will never more sit tight. If there is no crack, you can tighten it with care (e.g. in a lathe chuck).

Sweep second hands have rather short tubes, chronograph hands should have a long tube.

You are sure that the hand is moving on its pivot? The same sloppy reset will show if the hammer was not properly adjusted. 

Frank

Posted

Hi Frank, the watch is in very good working condition and the centre seconds hand is working as it should. It is just the power of the flyback that is sending it out of alignment. The tube is not cracked but I did notice that the hand sits well on the pivot but not what you would call snug.

Posted
4 hours ago, Pedro said:

Some pics of the watch. Still don't know if I buy a new centre seconds hand from Cousins if the tube lengths are all the same. This one is 1mm long.

You should be able to see the tip of the pivot through the hole in Central Seconds hand tube.

If you don't - probably you did not press it down enough.

Take a side-view photo so we could see the space between Hour, Minute and Central seconds hands.

Posted
8 hours ago, Poljot said:

You should be able to see the tip of the pivot through the hole in Central Seconds hand tube.

If you don't - probably you did not press it down enough.

Take a side-view photo so we could see the space between Hour, Minute and Central seconds hands.

Thanks to everyone for their input. I have decided to replace the centre seconds hand from Cousins and re copper it. Then I will reilluminate the minute and hour hands and the hour plots.  Also I will  treat it to a brand new Hirsch strap!?.

Posted (edited)

Hi I am just going through same thing with pretty much same watch. I have mine with Landeron 51 and measured dial side end of pin 0,29mm. Cousins provide hands up to 0,27mm. So just a friendly reminder that if have the same measurement, note you will have to drill 0,01mm of and fine tune with broach. Excellent process explanation was provided in this thread 

 

cheers 

 

Edited by Jakub
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...