Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Evening I thought I'd share my modest attic fresh finds less the nasty wrist bands. I bought them mainly for the Sekonda. Both not working, the Sekonda's balance was wrapped round it's rotor.

But the Timex really surprised me as it started to work as I adjusted the time. Stopped a bit, and after a bit of shaking and a gentle warming on a radiator I've got it to go. Though it does , run a little slow. The self winding side of it seems to work, however when I go to wind it manually it the crown winds back when you let go.  I guess this might be something to do with the click not engaging. 

loft_fresh.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
20 hours ago, Bearman said:

Evening I thought I'd share my modest attic fresh finds less the nasty wrist bands. I bought them mainly for the Sekonda. Both not working, the Sekonda's balance was wrapped round it's rotor.

But the Timex really surprised me as it started to work as I adjusted the time. Stopped a bit, and after a bit of shaking and a gentle warming on a radiator I've got it to go. Though it does , run a little slow. The self winding side of it seems to work, however when I go to wind it manually it the crown winds back when you let go.  I guess this might be something to do with the click not engaging. 

loft_fresh.jpg

Take a look at this "sophisticated" click ?

 

Click - Copy.PNG

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks watchweasol. I've had another look and it says the following at the bottom of the dial:

Great Britain "46562 10878"

JerseyMo, the plucky little watch isn't done yet. The auto-winding is definitely working. I've been checking in on it periodically and giving it a shake. It's ticking away as it should and the date advances, even if it's running about 12-15 mins slow over roughly a 12 hour period. I've warmed to it for sure. The bean counters can't mark this one off their spreadsheet just yet.

Hello again Poljot. Is the "sophisticated" click just a piece of bent metal engaging the teeth? I think I'll have to investigate further and report back, after I've cleaned the DNA and grime from around the case back before I open it!

 

Posted

Thanks watchweasol that's fantastic. I've had a quick scan through, it's always good to have a manual. You don't happen to have the 104 manual it refers to for cleaning?

Off now to read and digest, thanks again.

Posted

Thanks again. They explain the process pretty well and are a great help. Took the back off the watch tonight for a quick look and thanks to the manuals confirming, I need to get my hands on a crystal lift tool before I go any further. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Bearman said:

Thanks again. They explain the process pretty well and are a great help. Took the back off the watch tonight for a quick look and thanks to the manuals confirming, I need to get my hands on a crystal lift tool before I go any further. 

Do not get fooled  by simplicity of movement's agricultural look. Depending on how far you go with taking it apart, you may find soon that servicing Timex movements could be a royal pain, or simply irritating. Trying to fit all the wheels at once while holding two plates - can be challenging. Hairspring Wedge Pin - is also a "gift" from Timex, and so are V-conic bearings, and the balance screw. Good luck, but remember that preferred method of servicing such movements was Repair by Replacement with Timex refurbished movement.

  • Like 2
Posted

Hi If you can dismantle a Timex and put it back together again and make it tick a conventional watch should be straight forward. Consider this as your apprenticeship.    all the best an good luck.  just be patient.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi If you can dismantle a Timex and put it back together again and make it tick a conventional watch should be straight forward. Consider this as your apprenticeship.    all the best an good luck.  just be patient.

I am with weasol, when you see a non running timex, run and fast.

Posted

Thanks for the encouragement everyone. I've nothing to lose by investigating further, I'm in no rush and plan to take my time and it'll be another learning curve for sure. I've another project on the go at the moment, and I should really finish that first before embarking on the next challenge.

I saw the bit about the hairspring wedge, they make it sound so simple in the manual, I'm sure it's not......

Posted

Hi like I said before just take your time and don't get frustrated, because putting a Timex back together can be frustrating. Lining up all the wheels and dropping on the plate. Pinning the spring will be a bit daunting first time around but gets easier with practice.     all the best

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I love Timexes! It must have desiged to be an insult to the Swiss watch industry.

It's a real paradox. It's so simple yet so complicated. Anyone who is trained as a watchmaker would find them frustrating. 

Some are really ugly, some are simply elegant. Just look at their dials. Even after 50 years, some still look as good as the day it left the factory. And they are all held on by 4 metal tabs folded over the bottom plate.

Many of them have really taken a beating but just keep on ticking.

They may look like crap on a timegrapher but would still keep good time.

They are just great fun.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Graziano said:

Hey Poljot are they sapphire crystals? 

I agree don't get me wrong I'm just throwing in a bit of humour at my expense. But thanks for the link to the crystals ?

Definitely, custom made, just for your Timex and my Omega. I also keep one for MechanicMike You see how clear it is!

IMG_9429 - Copy.jpg

Edited by Poljot
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Good evening. I thought I just give you a little update as you were kind enough to share your wisdom. I had a interlude from Project Sekonda to look at the Timex as curiosity got the better of me.

JerseyMo, you were spot on with your diagnosis, yes indeed the click was worn. On close inspection there's a groove worn right into the click by the ratchet teeth. Is there a way to repair this or is it a case of looking for donor in the hope it's got a less worn click?

Many thanks again

Posted

an NOS replacement click is the best solution.  These are not so easy to come by so the next best is to find a donor.  You can find them on many Timex movements from the late 1970's thru 1990's. models would be in the 100 range. 104,105,107, and so on.  I know some have tried to bend down the portion of the tip on the old click to get it to catch the ratchet gear.  But, this is more of a temp fix and likely not to last very long.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi Mike I did a ships clock a long while ago, not a Hermle though and without getting the beast in my hands to refresh my memory I can’t recall the timing.  This doesn’t help I know but will start the grey matter turning.
    • Of course it will continue Richard.
    • I have stripped and cleaned a Hermle ships clock. It was just oily, no major faults, and I reassembled it, following my photos in reverse order. The time train is fine but the strike train will not play the ships bell strike for half-past. Ships bells play a four hour sequence for the 'watches' and play double 'ding' for the hour and the double dings plus one for the half past (eg half past the second hour is 'ding-ding' 'ding-ding' 'ding'). Sounds complicated but it isn't really. The strike wheel consists of pairs of bumps (for the ding-ding) and no single bumps. There must me some mechanism on the half-past that lifts the strike lever over one of the bumps so only one ding is played. When I get to a half past, it still plays double ding. I have a feeling it is to do with the lever in front of the rack (there is a sprung attachment  on it) and the position of the wheel (to the right) with the two pins that lets that lever fall, but no matter where I place that wheel I cannot get a single ding at half past! Please can someone help with advice on positioning so I can fix this? BTW Happy Easter 🐣 
    • No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup. The watch has a million problems but I have made solid progress. Impulse jewel replaced. Hairspring didn't match the balance (which also doesn't match the serial) but I got it down into range this weekend with 8 or 10 huge timing washers. Replaced the mainspring, balance and train are nice and free. At this point it is running consistently and in beat at about 160°, the third wheel has a bend that sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so. Remaining amplitude problems may be down to the escapement. The banking pins were way out and it didn't run at all before I started. It has one of the old brass escape wheels rather than steel, and I assume the faces its teeth are probably worn or scored in a way I can't yet fix (or see without a microscope). I know this watch is not going to run above 250° but I am going to keep trying to get above 200. But the best part about this watch? Some unscrupulous person stamped "21 JEWELS" on the train bridge sometime in the past, right on top of the Damascening. It's a 15 jewel movement.
    • I think it would rather be the blast of high current drain that would do the damage. But if used occasionally to maybe fix a mainspring or do dial feet it might be worth trying especially if the mainspring or a replacement couldn’t be found.    Tom
×
×
  • Create New...