Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Mr. Mailman brought this for me today.  Seems to be running fine,  a bit fast according to my Timegrapher.  Hopefully will just be a simple service and regulation.

 

post-752-0-91931600-1427745458_thumb.jpg

 

post-752-0-75363900-1427745464_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

My favourite thing about russian watches is that have a 'breguet overcoil' which you would only find on high end swiss movements. A few American movements have this too but similarly on their better models.

 

With this feature the overall size of the coils to not change .. in a typical movement without an overcoil the coils will expand and contract as the balance spins. This is seen as detrimental to good timekeeping.

 

Question.. are the two tabs at 12 and 6 part of the movement ring? Anything else holding the movement in? Looks like the clearances are a bit too generous.

 

rgds

Anil

Posted

Anil,

I did notice the overcoil when I had the back off, pretty cool. I haven't had the movement out of the case yet, but yeah those two tabs appear to be it.

I keep seeing this in a lot of watches. The movements have obvious screw holes where screws would go to hold it into the case but they are not used. Why is this so?

Posted

Depending on case construction.. it may be neccessary to use the screws to secure the movement to the case (as in front loaders where the bezel is removed and the movt+dial is loaded thru the front).

 

Where are movement ring like yours is used, this is pretty much dependant on the dial being fixed securely to the movement. If the dial feet fails then the movement gets wobbly in the case.

 

Some watches fix the movement ring to the watch with screws or combinations of screws and clamps.. this way the ring provides secure location independant of the dial. Better swiss watches from use this but some lazy watchmakers leave them out when servicing the movement.

 

Anil

Posted

Found out something else cool about this movement.  The balance wheel is made out of an alloy called "Glucydur"

 

According to Wikipedia:

Glucydur is a beryllium bronze; an alloy of berylliumcopper and iron. In addition to its low coefficient of thermal expansion, its hardness (400 Brinell), nonmagnetizability, and resistance to deformation and damage make it suited for making precision parts that must have high dimensional stability. Glucydur is also resistant to corrosion; it is rather inert chemically.

 

So that is kind of neat too. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If the watch is new, just return it to the seller for a refund or replacement.
    • Keevo, Welcome to the group ! I'm thinking that you have some damage to the hour, and/ or minute wheel. Possibly just a bent, otherwise damaged, or missing tooth.   Your photo didn't post that I can see. I think you'll have to open it to start really finding the issue. Best, Randy
    • An industrial break cleaner , like Holts does a good job of rinsing off paraffin 
    • In cap jewels on several watches I have serviced over the years. I've recently serviced a couple of Longines movements where the cap jewels were colourless. They are a real pain. Without colour they disappear when immersed in any liquid for cleaning 😲 Not necessarily. Cousins do a 10ml bottle for £26 which will last me for years. That's just half the price of a simple Bergeon silicone cushion, so not too expensive 🤣
    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
×
×
  • Create New...