Jump to content

2 piece automatic mainspring


AshF

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I'm working on an old CYMA bumper automatic and the spring is the 2 piece early automatic type.  After a quick search of this forum I found a link to this which said that both pieces should be oiled with an "oily rag" and the barrel wall oiled with pegwood. 

https://watchguy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Repairing-Omega-self-winding-watches-bumper.pdf

Would 8200 suit this?  Any advice?  I've got a new non auto mainspring that is very similar to the one pictured.

IMG_20210409_223612.thumb.jpg.f80181ad11eeab80f62be29c34816f78.jpg

Thanks,

Ash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your mainspring looks kind of set? As this is an automatic watch special grease is required on the outer wall known as breaking grease. Breaking grease is designed to hold the mainspring in place until it's wound up far enough then it will break free function as a grease and release some of the power. Otherwise the mainspring wind up tight and the automatic will break. A special breaking grease is applied to the outer wall. Then as you're using an older spring you can use the 8200 lubricate that. It was a modern spring you wouldn't have to use any lubrication on the spring except the wall itself.

Than if you look up your watch she should bill a find a modern automatic spring. On the modern Springs they attached the little bit at the end it's all one spring.

Then one of the problems with service guides are they can be very helpful but they can also be dated as there's new and different ways of doing things. I'm attaching some images of how you're supposed to do modern breaking grease. You will note they're not putting any lubrication on the spring itself as that's considered prelubricated or basically doesn't require lubrication. Only the barrel wall.

Then in case you get tempted the use 8200 is a breaking grease it will work very very poorly. That's because it's a grease with almost 0 breaking ability. It means as soon as the watch starts the wind up it will slip you'll probably get an hour or two of running and that sets won't even run overnight. So unfortunately really do need breaking grease.

 

 

mainspring barrel P125 2.JPG

mainspring barrel P125 1.JPG

mainspring barrel P125 4.JPG

mainspring barrel P125 3.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

As this is an automatic watch special grease is required on the outer wall known as breaking grease. 

Dictation software failure? Braking grease. My personal opinion, if one isn't in the mood of spending and waiting, try first with the wall cleaned and dry, see what kind of power reserve that gives you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, jdm said:

Dictation software failure?

Some days the dictation software doesn't like me. Then there's human error failure the problem of dyslexia not always catching things. There's a lot of places where it uses the wrong word sometimes I catch it sometimes I don't sometimes it just does goofy things sometimes I don't quite pronounce things correctly then things get even worse.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you @JohnR725 for your detailed response, I didn't know that about greasing the correct side of drum notches.

I do have breaking grease that I use for normal automatics with normal automatic mainsprings.  However this old watch I believe predates automatic mainsprings and breaking grease (please correct me if I'm wrong) and uses the special bridle to achieve this.  From the document I linked it talks about the bridle being lifted slightly by a wound mainspring allowing it to slip.  The document says to oil the spring, bridal and barrel wall with "oil" but neglects to say which oil (unless I've missed that part).  I would expect that the best oil used at that time would approximate 8200 so that is what I've used.

I get what you say about using modern replacements and techniques but in this case I'd like to keep it as original as possible.  I have replaced that set mainspring with something very similar which fits the barrel (with bridle) and arbour perfectly.  When winding it up you can feel the moment of slip at full (or nearly full) wind.  On a full wind it's been running for 12 hours (without the automatic module) with an amplitude of 230.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AshF said:

neglects to say which oil

Possibly was in a separate guide that you don't have? Notice at the very beginning of  the PDF that it's number one? This is one of the clever things Omega's done over the years realizing that generic things applied in watch repair. So generic things go in separate documentation that most people don't even know exists. 

1 hour ago, AshF said:

I get what you say about using modern replacements and techniques but in this case I'd like to keep it as original as possible.

If I read the description on how the mainspring works its identical to modern mainsprings. It just comes in two pieces and I'm guessing they didn't have breaking grease back then? This means that 8200 is probably the closest you're going to have whatever they had as there's not specifying.

It looks like for the rest your lubrication they do specify chronometer oil number one that's going to be hard to find I don't think it's made anymore. But they do reference that you could use Synt-A-Lube.

Then we've had discussions of automatic mainspring lubrication in the past. What always bothered me I remember reading something and I could never remember where? There may be other places but I found what I'm looking for in the document there's a test to tell if you did it right. I'm attaching that.

mainspring automatic slipping testing.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The watch ran for 37 hours on the bench so I'm going to chalk that up as a success.  The minute hand is really lose so I've got to address that before I can wear it and test it on the wrist.  So far I'm really happy.  What a beautiful movement but boy can you feel that bumper thud.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hey Guys,

I'm working on a Mido Multifort with a similar two piece mainspring as the OP.  I'm not wanting to buy anymore specialty oils at the moment.  Normally for mainsprings on pocket watches I've just used some 100% synthetic generic watch oil or my HP 9010.  Would it make a huge negative difference (even if not best practice) to use one of these instead of 8200?  I would be using it as suggested in the Omega watch repair manual linked above and by @AshF by putting it on the barrel wall and directly onto the mainspring.  It's a watch for my personal use only.  Thanks.  Arron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, arron said:

Mido Multifort with a similar two piece mainspring as the OP

in other words this is an automatic watch?

52 minutes ago, arron said:

Normally for mainsprings on pocket watches I've just used some 100% synthetic generic watch oil or my HP 9010.  Would it make a huge negative difference (even if not best practice) to use one of these instead of 8200?  I would be using it as suggested in the Omega watch repair manual linked above and by @AshF by putting it on the barrel wall and directly onto the mainspring.  It's a watch for my personal use only. 

it looks like you would like to use one of your oils or perhaps the 8200 on the barrel wall and the mainspring? 8200 perfect for use on mainsprings down below explains the purpose of breaking grease which the 8200 is not

On 4/10/2021 at 11:48 AM, JohnR725 said:

As this is an automatic watch special grease is required on the outer wall known as breaking grease. Breaking grease is designed to hold the mainspring in place until it's wound up far enough then it will break free function as a grease and release some of the power. Otherwise the mainspring wind up tight and the automatic will break. A special breaking grease is applied to the outer wall. Then as you're using an older spring you can use the 8200 lubricate that. It was a modern spring you wouldn't have to use any lubrication on the spring except the wall itself.

 

55 minutes ago, arron said:

It's a watch for my personal use only. 

in other words this is an experiment what's the consequence I suggest try it out see what happens probably shouldn't read the paragraph I quoted above which explains what breaking grease does as 8200 would have probably zero breaking qualities but for personal watch we can find out what's going to happen.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. Yes it is an automatic bumper watch. I know a little to nothing about automatic wrist watches so educated myself by reading a lot of your prior posts, which was very helpful. My understanding is that breaking grease is not required for this type with a two piece main spring.. Therefore I was hoping to get by with, either the generic watch oil or Mobius oil that I currently have. so I think I’ll just go ahead and give it a try doesn’t seem like there’s any permanent damage I can do. Ha ha. It would have been a good idea to check the power reserve before I disassembled it but unfortunately I did not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, arron said:

My understanding is that breaking grease is not required for this type with a two piece main spring.. Therefore I was hoping to get by with, either the generic watch oil or Mobius oil that I currently have. so I think I’ll just go ahead and give it a try doesn’t seem like there’s any permanent damage I can do. Ha ha. It would have been a good idea to check the power reserve before I disassembled it but unfortunately I did not.

the nice thing when you're learning watch repair with your own watch is that no harm comes if it doesn't work. so yes by all means try an experiment and no harm should come to it. his is where it's always fun to try experiments and go against whatever the rules are especially with lubrication because sometimes the Swiss don't get it right sometimes they do.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I often think about painting clear varnish on the coil.
    • I hate this battery release design in Ronda movements. It's an accident waiting to happen. One slip and the coil is gone. I wonder if it's a deliberate design.
    • so let's break this down the words restaffed balance wheel correctly would mean no distortion at all on the balance wheel. Which can be done but often isn't. Oftentimes balance wheels end up and times particularly discussing a bimetallic all bent up like the one in this discussion. If the balance wheel is out of round you definitely get a poise issue. You also get an issue if somebody pleases and out around balance wheel and then you fix the out of round now the wheel is poised incorrectly because somebody didn't physically make sure the balance wheel was correct in the first place. Yes people really do poise balance wheels that are neither flat or round it's quite annoying and then it typically with anything vintage there's an extreme likelihood of timing issues. Like the fun I had yesterday the wall thumb was 400 seconds fast and had a 202nd positional problem. So yes it's extremely common on vintage watches you're going to have things to fix from prior inappropriate repairs typically and it depends upon how it nitpicky you want to be here. In other words if you are statically poising the definition of poised would be if you give the balance wheel of push it will rotate eventually come to a stop and it will not rock back and forth at all is considered perfectly poised. Typically when I poise I don't worry about that I will let it rock back and forth because it still going to be within 15 seconds typically. Now the problem with statically poising absolutely perfectly is that it does not take into account the hairspring. This is why ideally if you are really obsessed you statically poise until your close and then finish with dynamic poising. This will take into account the hairspring collet that's probably not a poised collet. Yes Hamilton had another companies had poised collet's they hairspring itself affects the poise so for absolute perfect you have to dynamic poise. So the suggestion has been that it absolutely poised dynamically done balance wheel will not be statically poise absolutely perfectly.    this is an interesting one? In the United States of America over a time span and I don't remember the exact but it ended in the 60s there was a tear off on watches to protect the American watch industry. I've read the books on the tariffs specifications it would bump up the cost of better watches to making them expensive. This is why you will often see a nice Omega watch for instance that was regulated was adjusted and was still keeping really good time will be marked not adjusted. Because the quantity of jewels each jewel bumped up the cost adjustment adjustment and variety of positions bumped up the cost so a huge percentage of watches imported into this country will be not adjusted but they were adjusted at the factory it's just a terra thing then I suspect that even the cheapest of watches probably were somewhat adjusted because if they had zero adjustments I have no idea how bad the timekeeping would be? It's one of the problems of we don't actually have numbers of what the watches really should be doing we only have numbers of timekeeping basically when timing machines exist or for things like railroad grade watches where they absolutely had to know what the timekeeping is doing. So railroad timekeeping specification in this country is of watch Dependent up has to be within plus or -30/2 per week. Which if you compare it to the specifications of chronometer grade will ask which I think could be up to six seconds a day is better than a Rolex. this is one of my amusements at work. There we have that really nice which he timing machine full automatic microphone we look at every single watch and six positions and my boss once the watches all the keep really good time. So basically the watchmakers have learned to let the boss adjust the watches it seems to make him happy and we can do other things like service watches. So yesterday's fun on the 18 size Waltham to get the 400 timing down to think he got it down to 15 seconds it might've been better than that the Delta was still might've been within a minute much better than what it was before but still took more than an hour of time. When we don't specifically charge for this we charge for servicing of the watch we do not typically charge to make your watch keep time in multiple positions so yes it wastes a lot of time unless you're getting paid for it where it can definitely eat up a lot of time to fix vintage watches that I've had interesting repair histories. sorry I don't remember the brand name we once had a watch that was one of I take 1000 it actually was engraved number or something of something in other words it was a very expensive Swiss watch and I believe there was at least one shim under something. I always think of at the factory level if you have to place a shim to me it's a sign of poor manufacturing but there was a Swiss watch a nice watch that had it done. Of course what it may also be a sign of limited quantity of watches where things or adjusted at the factory we end up with interesting problems and I will pick on American pocket watches again with interesting repairs that can happen? For instance pocket watches dropped balance staff is broken possibly the whole jewels are broken and sometimes cap stones get broken. or worst-case I had a Hamilton 992 it actually had little notches taken out of the main plate I always wonder if it got hit by a train and things were dramatically bent in this watch somebody had ground the pallet fork bridge down to accommodate the balance wheel because the balance bridge had been bent to insane proportions it was bent so much it was no longer up and down in alignment so I always wondered if this particular watch got hit by a train. With its ultimate repair it would've been better to just replace the whole movement but instead we cannibalized another movements to replace all of the horribly mutilated parts. Now back to not watches hit by a train while somebody was crossing the railroad track. If the balance jewels are broken they are replaced but the same problem like we have on this group where do you get replacements? This means people in the field will get creative if they replace things with size differently than the original things will change. In other words the total length of the balance staff conceivably will change because they've changed the jewels and they're not properly sized. Then there's a problem of replacement balance staffs I personally have often theorized in the case of  bestfit  that they deliberately made the staffs oversize so the watchmaker can reduce the size. But what if you don't have a lay then what happens? A for instance the Hamilton 992B only has one balance staff as it's of friction staff but often times the friction staff doesn't fit because the replacement staff is slightly oversize which should be impossible but it happens. Often times I have to go through an assortment of staffs to find one that fits because I don't feel like reducing at the size to fit. More common though would be staffs with pivots that are too long and if the watchmaker does not have a lathe again how do they fix that problem well undesirable for us that have to deal with it down the road so an ideal perfect world the adjusted by the factory to whatever the specification was at the time and on a seven jewel American pocket watch it's not going to be railroad timekeeping. If we replace the staff in a proper fashion without bending or distorting anything the watch should keep time within the specification when it was originally made except of course we don't know what the specification was and they definitely did not have timing machines when this watch was made. If we replace the balanced staff with a factory original factory staff and everything should fit perfectly if the jewels were broken and we used factory jewels everything once again would be perfect. Although if you look in the parts book typically for American pocket watches for certain parts they recommend sending the entire watch or parts of the watch back because American watch manufacturing at least until the not sure exact date but sometime past the 20s definitely by the 50s watches were made in batches which is why everything has a serial number and the tools over the course of the batch tend to wear a little bit. So conceivably something made at the beginning and the end of the batch may not fit without adjustments. Plus of course there's variations in parts I like the pic on Elgin because they have one balance staff that comes in four different size variations and then a whole bunch of pivot variations all with the same part number so yes and an absolute perfect world which doesn't exist changing a balance staff with everything factory new would not require poising or truing the balance wheel because everything should still be perfect. But unfortunately in the 100+ year life of your watch things have happened. If you want to grasp that go back and start on page 1 of this discussion as the balance wheels in this discussion have had issues they're not flat the probably out of round there were issues with the jewels there is issues possibly with the staffs. Oh and yes apparently there's a donor watch and if the donor watch is not within a very close serial number range of the original watch it will have very likely sizing differences especially for anything related to the balance wheel because all the vintage watches were adjusted individually in the factory. If you look at a video on I can find it if you want to watch it on YouTube from I believe the 30s where you will see on escapement related stuff every single watch is adjusted which is why you can't just grab the balance wheel from one watch shove it into another one as they were adjusted at the factory                    
    • I see a lot of URLs pointing to 1drv.com which appears to be a CDN for OneDrive.
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England.  
×
×
  • Create New...