Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello to all,

My name is Ash (from NZ). Im a watch enthusiast and trying to learn more about Horology.

I have been picking odd watch repair jobs here and there and self-learning.

Firstly, thanks a lot to Mark Lovick for uploading fantastic videos on youtube that are so simple to follow. Keep up the great work :)

Question - is there a way to diagnose quartz watch circuit using those test probes (that have an LED inbuilt) or perhaps using a multi-meter? For some watch movements such as Myota 2035, it makes sense to replace the whole movement. In other cases, it make sense to repair it (if possible).

Is there a way to narrow down the faults in quartz watch? For instance, if a watch is gaining/loosing time, it could be the quartz crystal out of freq etc. how can it be scanned appropriately?

Im not sure if its even possible or not. Hopefully I could get some help here.

Thanks a lot in advance

Ash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A friend of mine who's an amateur, but very competent, repairer, has a machine on which he places the watch - minus battery. When he presses a button, the magnetic mechanism inside the machine kicks in and turns the watch movement and hands at high speed. If the hands and movement don't whizz round, he considers the quartz movement to be probably beyond repair - broken circuit board, faulty coil, etc. If the movement does run on the machine, then it may well be repairable.

 

Apologies if you know this already - I speak as an observer - and apologies for not knowing what the machine's called!

 

Oh - and a warm welcome to the forum!

Edited by WillFly
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Ash,

                 Welcome to the forum,  which seems to be growing very rapidly, by the way.  I'm afraid I do not know the answer to your question, but I think a good place to start would be to find out the name of the quartz tester Will mentions above.  There are members at all skill levels on the forum and no doubt someone will have more advice for you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought that if it's any other thing than the coil it's u/s. But isn't there something about a coil being separate from the board that changes the games a little. Like the boy's have said the name of that device would be handy and knowledge from the man would be good. There are many levels of skill on the forum so good luck with it and Wecome to the forum btw. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes you will need a multimeter and access to the data-sheet for the movement will be a help.

 

Israel's tool looks really good, but I have not got one. 

 

Other meter's made by Witschi are extremely expensive but are industry standard, they rarely come up on eBay but you could get a bargain from time to time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A friend of mine who's an amateur, but very competent, repairer, has a machine on which he places the watch - minus battery. When he presses a button, the magnetic mechanism inside the machine kicks in and turns the watch movement and hands at high speed. If the hands and movement don't whizz round, he considers the quartz movement to be probably beyond repair - broken circuit board, faulty coil, etc. If the movement does run on the machine, then it may well be repairable.

 

Apologies if you know this already - I speak as an observer - and apologies for not knowing what the machine's called!

 

Oh - and a warm welcome to the forum!

hi WillFly,

 

thanks a lot for your comment. that machine is called 'demagnetizer'. if the movement runs freely on magnetizer, that generally means gear train is fine. it also means the fault lies either in coil or circuit. i do have one of those already. its a cheap chinese one but does the trick :)

 

I was more keen on learning how to fix the circuit, if possible. I have succesfully fixed few coils. they are not too bad. Le arsi has got a good video on it

 

 

Cheers for your help :)

 

Ash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks a lot to Autowind, Craig, SeikoWatch & Mark Lovick for their comments.

 

i have been thinking of building something similar to what LeArsi shows on youtube. looks like a good nifty project :)

 

Most of all, really appreciate the wearm welcome i have received on this forum so far. Glad to be a part of it.

 

i have got one more queestion re Watch crystal glass. I will make a seperate thread for it.

 

Regards

 

Ash NZ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that machine is called 'demagnetizer'. if the movement runs freely on magnetizer, that generally means gear train is fine. it also means the fault lies either in coil or circuit. i do have one of those already. its a cheap chinese one but does the trick :)

 

Not sure I recommend a de-magnetiser. I know it pushes the wheels around but my fear is it would potentially affect the stepping motor. I have no evidence of this - it's just that I can be a cautious bugger :)

 

The Etic Polytest and Omnitest both have that function plus they generate a signal to indicate if power is going through the circuit.

 

 

They are great machines, and come in very handy - I have had them for years.

 

Sadly they are no longer being manufactured but I do understand there are some alternatives out there.

 

post-1-0-08582600-1392936734_thumb.jpg

 

I have fixed a few coils in the past but circuits are not my thing, if I feel one is damaged I would rather replace it if I can ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi Ash welcome to the forum. I'm curious too about your question so please keep us posted of any progress...and if you build a tester I might be interested! Quartz is not my line of expertise ( and barely the others either, I'm a beginner).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Dear fellow members,

 

I currently own the pictured tester, nevertheless, I'd like to do a more in depth testing on individual circuits in the watch, like component resistance/impedance, continuity, etc. This one is supposed to do some but is not a full meter.

 

post-253-0-24486900-1417460566.jpg

 

 

Do you have a suggestion of what would be a good amp/ohmmeter and/or full tester for in depth work on digital watches? Thank you in advance,

 

Bob

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you clockboy, I do too, but regretfully this movement I will be tackling is US$100! I'm talking about the ETA 251.272 and the next in line in my workbench is not much better, ETA 251.471, same price! If all is well, it will be very rewarding to have them going again without a transplant!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently serviced an Omega DeVille quartz watch...

 

Held my nose while I opened the case, but lo and behold the movement was actually a lovely lovely thing. Thirteen jewels and the bare minimum of plastic.... i'll dig out a pic...

 

Actually Dave the Watch Guy has a teardown of exactly the same watch:

 

http://watchguy.co.uk/service-omega-ladies-deville-calibre-1471-quartz/

Edited by mwilkes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When replacing a battery in a Quartz Movement I check the consumption and rate.  This is a good indication of the health of the movement.

 

Consumptions:

 

Basic 2 Hand >900nA

Basic 3 Hand >1.5uA

3 Hand with Complication >2.0uA

Chronograph >2.8uA

 

Rate should be very low ... like +0.15 sec/day

 

If I get high consumption readings, the movement needs a strip and clean.

 

If I get no readings, I check the coil for damage or corrosion ... if it's good, then I isolate and check the Quartz is oscillating, and then isolate and check the IC.  Either of these two are the issue, then you need to replace the circuit ... because most manufactures won't sell you a crystal, or coil these days, which stinks!!

 

The machine I use is the Witschi Q1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Lawson,

 

Very clear instructions. Do you have a suggestion for a good volt-amp meter appropriate for this? I don't think I'll get into a witschi right now although I'm already drooling at the sight of it. :)

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When replacing a battery in a Quartz Movement I check the consumption and rate. This is a good indication of the health of the movement.

Consumptions:

Basic 2 Hand >900nA

Basic 3 Hand >1.5uA

3 Hand with Complication >2.0uA

Chronograph >2.8uA

Rate should be very low ... like +0.15 sec/day

If I get high consumption readings, the movement needs a strip and clean.

If I get no readings, I check the coil for damage or corrosion ... if it's good, then I isolate and check the Quartz is oscillating, and then isolate and check the IC. Either of these two are the issue, then you need to replace the circuit ... because most manufactures won't sell you a crystal, or coil these days, which stinks!!

The machine I use is the Witschi Q1.

I believe you made mistake,there are maximum values for every movement provided in the technical document of the manufacturer of the movement, as it is written in your post now it seems that there are minimum values, whuch is not correct.

Besides the values of power consupmtion there are two values whiich should be checked also:

Lowest working limit(voltage on which movement stops working)

Rate i dont need to explain this

br

emso

p.s sent from my sh**y phone, so sorry for typing mistakes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

emso, on 06 Dec 2014 - 06:17 AM, said:

I believe you made mistake,there are maximum values for every movement provided in the technical document of the manufacturer of the movement, as it is written in your post now it seems that there are minimum values, whuch is not correct.

 

ROFL! :D  Sorry I always get those stupid symbols back-the-front ... They are max values peeps, and I'm an idiot :p

 

emso, on 06 Dec 2014 - 06:17 AM, said:

Besides the values of power consupmtion there are two values whiich should be checked also:

Lowest working limit(voltage on which movement stops working)

 

Oh yes, I forgot to mention the lowest working limit. 

To explain, this is when you connect probes to the battery terminals, sent a set voltage to the watch, and note if it's still running.  Starting at 1.5V and dropping down from there (you can set these voltages on the tester).  A good movement should still be ticking at 1.3V, and at this point, or below, should be going into it's "Low Battery Warning" mode of ticking off 2 seconds at a time.  Then lower the voltage more until the watch stops, and note down that voltage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Lawson,

 

Very clear instructions. Do you have a suggestion for a good volt-amp meter appropriate for this? I don't think I'll get into a witschi right now although I'm already drooling at the sight of it. :)

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

 

Sorry mate, I don't know of one.  I work on Quartz all day at work, so I only do mechanicals at home.  And the cost of these testers is crazy expensive!

 

I have been told, and seen, that cheaper one have trouble testing some of the Japanese Movements, so if you are serious about buying a tester make sure you do your homework that it covers all the bases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I often think about painting clear varnish on the coil.
    • I hate this battery release design in Ronda movements. It's an accident waiting to happen. One slip and the coil is gone. I wonder if it's a deliberate design.
    • so let's break this down the words restaffed balance wheel correctly would mean no distortion at all on the balance wheel. Which can be done but often isn't. Oftentimes balance wheels end up and times particularly discussing a bimetallic all bent up like the one in this discussion. If the balance wheel is out of round you definitely get a poise issue. You also get an issue if somebody pleases and out around balance wheel and then you fix the out of round now the wheel is poised incorrectly because somebody didn't physically make sure the balance wheel was correct in the first place. Yes people really do poise balance wheels that are neither flat or round it's quite annoying and then it typically with anything vintage there's an extreme likelihood of timing issues. Like the fun I had yesterday the wall thumb was 400 seconds fast and had a 202nd positional problem. So yes it's extremely common on vintage watches you're going to have things to fix from prior inappropriate repairs typically and it depends upon how it nitpicky you want to be here. In other words if you are statically poising the definition of poised would be if you give the balance wheel of push it will rotate eventually come to a stop and it will not rock back and forth at all is considered perfectly poised. Typically when I poise I don't worry about that I will let it rock back and forth because it still going to be within 15 seconds typically. Now the problem with statically poising absolutely perfectly is that it does not take into account the hairspring. This is why ideally if you are really obsessed you statically poise until your close and then finish with dynamic poising. This will take into account the hairspring collet that's probably not a poised collet. Yes Hamilton had another companies had poised collet's they hairspring itself affects the poise so for absolute perfect you have to dynamic poise. So the suggestion has been that it absolutely poised dynamically done balance wheel will not be statically poise absolutely perfectly.    this is an interesting one? In the United States of America over a time span and I don't remember the exact but it ended in the 60s there was a tear off on watches to protect the American watch industry. I've read the books on the tariffs specifications it would bump up the cost of better watches to making them expensive. This is why you will often see a nice Omega watch for instance that was regulated was adjusted and was still keeping really good time will be marked not adjusted. Because the quantity of jewels each jewel bumped up the cost adjustment adjustment and variety of positions bumped up the cost so a huge percentage of watches imported into this country will be not adjusted but they were adjusted at the factory it's just a terra thing then I suspect that even the cheapest of watches probably were somewhat adjusted because if they had zero adjustments I have no idea how bad the timekeeping would be? It's one of the problems of we don't actually have numbers of what the watches really should be doing we only have numbers of timekeeping basically when timing machines exist or for things like railroad grade watches where they absolutely had to know what the timekeeping is doing. So railroad timekeeping specification in this country is of watch Dependent up has to be within plus or -30/2 per week. Which if you compare it to the specifications of chronometer grade will ask which I think could be up to six seconds a day is better than a Rolex. this is one of my amusements at work. There we have that really nice which he timing machine full automatic microphone we look at every single watch and six positions and my boss once the watches all the keep really good time. So basically the watchmakers have learned to let the boss adjust the watches it seems to make him happy and we can do other things like service watches. So yesterday's fun on the 18 size Waltham to get the 400 timing down to think he got it down to 15 seconds it might've been better than that the Delta was still might've been within a minute much better than what it was before but still took more than an hour of time. When we don't specifically charge for this we charge for servicing of the watch we do not typically charge to make your watch keep time in multiple positions so yes it wastes a lot of time unless you're getting paid for it where it can definitely eat up a lot of time to fix vintage watches that I've had interesting repair histories. sorry I don't remember the brand name we once had a watch that was one of I take 1000 it actually was engraved number or something of something in other words it was a very expensive Swiss watch and I believe there was at least one shim under something. I always think of at the factory level if you have to place a shim to me it's a sign of poor manufacturing but there was a Swiss watch a nice watch that had it done. Of course what it may also be a sign of limited quantity of watches where things or adjusted at the factory we end up with interesting problems and I will pick on American pocket watches again with interesting repairs that can happen? For instance pocket watches dropped balance staff is broken possibly the whole jewels are broken and sometimes cap stones get broken. or worst-case I had a Hamilton 992 it actually had little notches taken out of the main plate I always wonder if it got hit by a train and things were dramatically bent in this watch somebody had ground the pallet fork bridge down to accommodate the balance wheel because the balance bridge had been bent to insane proportions it was bent so much it was no longer up and down in alignment so I always wondered if this particular watch got hit by a train. With its ultimate repair it would've been better to just replace the whole movement but instead we cannibalized another movements to replace all of the horribly mutilated parts. Now back to not watches hit by a train while somebody was crossing the railroad track. If the balance jewels are broken they are replaced but the same problem like we have on this group where do you get replacements? This means people in the field will get creative if they replace things with size differently than the original things will change. In other words the total length of the balance staff conceivably will change because they've changed the jewels and they're not properly sized. Then there's a problem of replacement balance staffs I personally have often theorized in the case of  bestfit  that they deliberately made the staffs oversize so the watchmaker can reduce the size. But what if you don't have a lay then what happens? A for instance the Hamilton 992B only has one balance staff as it's of friction staff but often times the friction staff doesn't fit because the replacement staff is slightly oversize which should be impossible but it happens. Often times I have to go through an assortment of staffs to find one that fits because I don't feel like reducing at the size to fit. More common though would be staffs with pivots that are too long and if the watchmaker does not have a lathe again how do they fix that problem well undesirable for us that have to deal with it down the road so an ideal perfect world the adjusted by the factory to whatever the specification was at the time and on a seven jewel American pocket watch it's not going to be railroad timekeeping. If we replace the staff in a proper fashion without bending or distorting anything the watch should keep time within the specification when it was originally made except of course we don't know what the specification was and they definitely did not have timing machines when this watch was made. If we replace the balanced staff with a factory original factory staff and everything should fit perfectly if the jewels were broken and we used factory jewels everything once again would be perfect. Although if you look in the parts book typically for American pocket watches for certain parts they recommend sending the entire watch or parts of the watch back because American watch manufacturing at least until the not sure exact date but sometime past the 20s definitely by the 50s watches were made in batches which is why everything has a serial number and the tools over the course of the batch tend to wear a little bit. So conceivably something made at the beginning and the end of the batch may not fit without adjustments. Plus of course there's variations in parts I like the pic on Elgin because they have one balance staff that comes in four different size variations and then a whole bunch of pivot variations all with the same part number so yes and an absolute perfect world which doesn't exist changing a balance staff with everything factory new would not require poising or truing the balance wheel because everything should still be perfect. But unfortunately in the 100+ year life of your watch things have happened. If you want to grasp that go back and start on page 1 of this discussion as the balance wheels in this discussion have had issues they're not flat the probably out of round there were issues with the jewels there is issues possibly with the staffs. Oh and yes apparently there's a donor watch and if the donor watch is not within a very close serial number range of the original watch it will have very likely sizing differences especially for anything related to the balance wheel because all the vintage watches were adjusted individually in the factory. If you look at a video on I can find it if you want to watch it on YouTube from I believe the 30s where you will see on escapement related stuff every single watch is adjusted which is why you can't just grab the balance wheel from one watch shove it into another one as they were adjusted at the factory                    
    • I see a lot of URLs pointing to 1drv.com which appears to be a CDN for OneDrive.
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England.  
×
×
  • Create New...