Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

He'll everyone. I have had an AS1287 inside a 50s-60s Iram military style watch for too long, and have had continued issues with it relating to the balance staff. 

 

There appears to be two versions, an earlier non shock balance and a later Inca setup. No matter what I try I always seem to end up with the shorter Inca staffs or balance complete. I've tried four so far and I am getting frustrated. 

Does anyone know of any documentation that would show me the correct staff measurements for a non shock AS1287?

I have found what I think is the right staff (pictured) and have included the ones I currently have (the packet on the watchmakers mat), however I don't understand the measurement method on the packets. Can someone please confirm which of the two is the longer (higher)?

 

Any help much appreciated, especially relating to the measurement standard. thankyou.

20210622_145744.jpg

Screenshot_20210622-145721_eBay.jpg

Posted

If you want some measurements on a non inca there is the one which says sold out BS5484, which is slightly longer than the inca version, guess the BS0414 might be some equivalent but not sure since the rest of the measurements are missing from the BS5484.
Notice there also exists atleast a third version for the supershock. ( And probably some more). So, measure your balance carefully.

https://www.balancestaffs.com/a-schild.php?caliber=1287

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, HSL said:

If you want some measurements on a non inca there is the one which says sold out BS5484, which is slightly longer than the inca version, guess the BS0414 might be some equivalent but not sure since the rest of the measurements are missing from the BS5484.
Notice there also exists atleast a third version for the supershock. ( And probably some more). So, measure your balance carefully.

https://www.balancestaffs.com/a-schild.php?caliber=1287

Thanks for your reply. I unfortunately don't have an original staff to measure, as I bought the movement without a balance. Therein lies my frustration. The site you linked to is very helpful though, hopefully I can measure my existing (recently bought) staffs and take it from there.

Edited by Pauldoubleyou
Posted
2 hours ago, Pauldoubleyou said:

There appears to be two versions, an earlier non shock balance and a later Inca setup. No matter what I try I always seem to end up with the shorter Inca staffs or balance complete. I've tried four so far and I am getting frustrated. 

Does anyone know of any documentation that would show me the correct staff measurements for a non shock AS1287?

I think what the problem here is you're asking the wrong question. The question is what part number do I need so that I can end up with the correct balance? Or the correct balance staff for that matter? If you look at the second link it lists the parts for your watch. This is always where things get interesting? you'll notice for balance staff they list seven different ones. For balance complete they do show three but if you look at the part numbers there's only two.

then I attached some images from bestfit online and of course additional problems perhaps. Notice you have lots of choices and probably only one that's right.

then the physical bestfit book becomes interesting because is an indication that there are variations which is of course why there so many listed in the images. but fortunately it looks like you want the basic simple one which should be 100/66.  unfortunately for the third link it's out of stock. then providing this is the right staff number I snipped out a couple of more images of the bestfit book which is what the dimensions mean and the dimensions. One of the irritating things of the physical book is on the dimension chart if you're trying to find a particular staff you just have to be lucky to go through the list and find it it be really nice if they list of the sizes by the numeric staff also.

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&AS_1287

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=AS_1287

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=U\ZD]J

http://www.julesborel.com/s.nl/it.A/id.151223/.f

 

as 1287 1.JPG

as 1287 2.JPG

100 66 staff size.JPG

staff dimension best fit 100 parts.JPG

Posted

I have found using as much data from the old balance is most useful. Even when purchasing the correct balance some tweaking is often required 

Posted (edited)

Hi,

16 hours ago, Pauldoubleyou said:

Does anyone know of any documentation that would show me the correct staff measurements for a non shock AS1287?

Any staff manufacturer's catalog (Ronda, DCN) shows the sizes. You already got them above (L=290).
Ronda's is available as pdf on the Cousins website.

16 hours ago, Pauldoubleyou said:

I have found what I think is the right staff (pictured) and have included the ones I currently have (the packet on the watchmakers mat), however I don't understand the measurement method on the packets. Can someone please confirm which of the two is the longer (higher)?

The staffs in your 1st picture are totally wrong. "1287" is Ronda's staff number - not the calibre, which you find below: "IMER 485". Its length is 308.

There are no staff sizes on the packages.

BTW. the length difference of AS1287 staffs is minimal: ordinary 290, Incabloc 287 (all are 1/100 mm).

Frank

Edited by praezis
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is the old/first(?) way for making a mainspring for an automatic. "Evolution-wise" it is an logical first step forward from a standard spring. Usually these are indeed replaced with a new spring with an integrated/fixed bridle. Lubrication as you would do with any automatic.
    • I'm working on a Schild AS 1250 (a 'bumper' automatic) and it's the first time I've seen a mainspring like this. It has what looks like a regular manual-wind mainspring with a 'hook' at its outer extremity. On a manual-wind watch that 'hook' would engage with a 'hook' in the barrel wall to prevent it from rotating. However, the AS 1250's mainspring does not engage directly with the barrel but rather with a 'sliding bridle' that sits between the mainspring and the barrel wall, and evidently facilitates the slip necessary in an automatic. I'm not sure what advantage this two-piece configuration provides, but it highlights a gap (one of many) in my horological knowledge. I'm not sure if 'hook' is the correct term as used above, but please see photo below to see what I mean. Therefore, two questions please. 1. What is the proper way to lubricate a barrel from an automatic watch with a sliding bridle? My guess is the same as any automatic ms/barrel (e.g, a few dabs of braking grease on the interior barrel wall). What do the experts say? 2. I purchased a Generale Ressorts GR3472X mainspring, made for the AS 1250. It looks like the bridle is included and I don't need to salvage and re-use the old one. Is this a safe assumption? Thanks for the advice. If you have any other wisdom you'd like to share about separate sliding mainspring bridles, I would be very interested. Cheers!
    • Thank you Hector. You too matey 😊
    • Bless you, Mark. May you live long and prosper!
    • That’s a nice idea, But i’m committed to providing this site as a gift to the watch repair community as my thank you for my incredible life i’ve had in this business. Ive done well and unless my financial circumstances change then i’m more than happy to foot the bill. If circumstances do change then be assured that I will make an appeal. For now, I’m comfortable with the way things are and I am extremely delighted to remove Google Ads from this site and to stop Patreon, it feels like a major step forward 🙂 Sorry, I missed your reply, I got blinded by another poster in this thread. Yes - I can confirm that I have always seen WRT as a not-for-profit website, and therefore - not a business as such. I’m lucky and have done well in my life due to a decision made in my teens to start a watch repairing apprenticeship which has sustained myself and my family for many years now. Consider this my small way of paying it forward. Ive been committed to keeping the site alive on a technical and financial level for over 10 years now and I have zero plans to change that. Thank you for your kind words by the way. And as for your wish - nobody can control what happens in life, if something happens to me I have things in place with my family but I’m just not comfortable talking about my personal business - I wish a certain person would respect that, but i’ve calmed down now - i’m only human 😄  
×
×
  • Create New...