Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Texas,     I lay the bridge on an anvil and make four nicks around the premiter of the hole, be careful not to bend the bridge.

Good luck pal

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Several options according to your skill and equipment.

Close the hole with a domed punch, then ream if necessary

Tin the hole with solder then ream

Loctite 638 gap sealant

SLO-ZAP gap sealant (CousinsUK)

Jewellers cement

And of course shellac - make a thick solution in alcohol. This is the easy fix and it is reversible.

 

  • Like 3
Posted

There are two jewels here. I'm guessing when you installed the bridge the center wheel wasn't seated in its jewel, pushed up, and knocked out the upper jewel (it's for the 4th wheel). I would try pressing it back in; but first, push out the other jewel. Then press each one in from its side, making them just-flush with the surface. They aren't supposed to touch each other.

  • Like 1
Posted

If the bridge would be of brass I would recommend to close it with a punch since the material is so soft the jewels would widen the hole when they go in and they wouldn’t stay in place when pushed in again, but if it is a harder alloy like nickelsilver or steel I would just push them back in as @nickelsilver suggests. One sometimes has to asses what material is holding the jewel.

  • Like 1
Posted

Great input! I will take a careful look this morning and report back. 

I have staking sets and jeweling tools, so all I need is to apply best method.

this watch has never been serviced...pretty sure. 

Posted

OK, here is the big (little) picture.

As you can see, there is a place for only one jewel.  It sits on a recessed rim.  The jewel sits top side.

I think the jewel is providing a bearing surface for the sweep second wheel.

Sooo, I think that I do nothing special.  Place the bridge, place the jewel, drop in the sweep second wheel (et al.) and install the train plate.

BTW, these pictures were taken on my stereo microscope.  Only yesterday I designed an interface between the eyepiece and my old Canon S95 camera (3D printed converter). Wow...my new tool appeared just in time!

2021-07-03 06_27_35-IMG_7369.JPG ‎- Photos.png

2021-07-03 06_27_09-IMG_7370.JPG ‎- Photos.png

2021-07-03 06_26_51-IMG_7371.JPG ‎- Photos.png

2021-07-03 06_26_39-Photos.png

Posted (edited)

Does look like two jewels.  lots of good advice.  Could close the hole or find a new jewel and retap the hole to fit only 1 jewel.  I would make a setting:)

Edited by jdrichard
Posted
9 hours ago, jdrichard said:

I would make a setting

Yes you would.  I have seen your work...I am not there yet.  This is watch came from the pile...using it to learn but not ready to learn jeweling.  I have all the tools to do it I think...Dad left me a lot!

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Not sure what sins I committed to receive the punishment I got today.

This P75 presented yet another jewel issue.

The shock jewels are MT Antichoc.  They suck big time.  They come out in three pieces, hole jewel, cap jewel, spacer.  SPACER!! Really?  And I was not paying attention as to order and orientation (I am still a noob 😞 ).  Moreover, the spring on the bottom jewel can easily disconnect (and fly away).  The top jewel spring is blocked from escaping by the regulator ring.  Well...I was assembling the jewels wrong and could not get the springs to engage. Finally posted for help on a FB watchmaking forum and got an instant answer.  Still...with the true knowledge, it was a very challenging task.

All of my work was done inside a baggie.  Thankfully so, because that spring went flying five or six times.  Jewels too.

It is all together now but I am not happy with the readout on the timegrapher.  This is part of my training...figure this stuff out.

2021-07-03 12_23_37-IMG_7348.JPG ‎- Photos.png

2021-07-03 12_30_38-Photos.png

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/3/2021 at 1:35 PM, LittleWatchShop said:

As you can see, there is a place for only one jewel.  It sits on a recessed rim.  The jewel sits top side.

While I had the Lorsa P72 case back open I thought I take a couple of shots to show how the bridge should look like. As you see the Lorsa P72 and the Lorsa P75 are quite the same with small tweaks separating them. (Yes, I already took the click away).

1_Movement.thumb.jpg.09186ff5a882a7dd6c1ef79269e51249.jpg

 

Here we see the Lorsa logotype, same as in your Waltham.

2_Logo.thumb.jpg.d6674e6f889d652ef77825f675211103.jpg

 

We fast forward a bit to get to the lower bridge. Here it is with its upper jewel.

3_Bridge.thumb.jpg.15710f927dfea416221ccee16898ebf3.jpg

 

The upper jewel is slightly smaller with a small hole in it to guide the second wheel, it also has an oil sink.

5_Lower_Jewel.thumb.jpg.975a445e249f03bc6a9b6d8e7e3a6129.jpg

 

The lower jewel is larger one with a large hole to guide the center wheel, this one is just flat.

4_Upper_Jewel.thumb.jpg.6d840713993b9225371a4cf51d3893e2.jpg

So, two jewels and if you found them you should be able to just press them in flush with the bridge, no extensive
work or quirky ideas needed.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, HSL said:

The lower jewel is larger one with a large hole to guide the center wheel

I am virtually certain there was no lower jewel on the P75.  I check to see how the center wheel interfaced to the plate and it appeared to be metal-metal.  Furthermore, odds of two jewels being loose and falling out seem pretty low.  A real mystery.  Thanks for taking the time to take the pictures.

  • 2 years later...
Posted (edited)
On 7/3/2021 at 5:09 PM, LittleWatchShop said:

The shock jewels are MT Antichoc.  They suck big time.  They come out in three pieces, hole jewel, cap jewel, spacer.  SPACER!! Really?  And I was not paying attention as to order and orientation (I am still a noob 😞 ).  Moreover, the spring on the bottom jewel can easily disconnect (and fly away).  The top jewel spring is blocked from escaping by the regulator ring.  Well...I was assembling the jewels wrong and could not get the springs to engage. Finally posted for help on a FB watchmaking forum and got an instant answer.  Still...with the true knowledge, it was a very challenging task.

Hey @LittleWatchShop! Do you remember what order these parts go in? Spacer between the hole jewel and cap jewel, or spacer below the hole jewel? I just put a new balance complete in a Waltham Lorsa P72 I had sitting in a box for a year, and however I assembled it last time I get no end shake and no balance movement. I think I had the spacer in between but now I'm wondering if it should have been below the hole jewel.

I can't find a diagram of the Antichoc 102 system anywhere.

 

Also, for whatever it's worth now, my Lorsa P72 also had that loose center wheel jewel that just sits in on the bridge. It was not friction fit, just sat in a recess.

 

 

It does seem to be that the spacer washer goes between the hole jewel and the cap jewel. Without my pallet fork installed and the shock setting in that configuration I'm getting a solid 45sec of free balance movement after a puff of air. So my issue is something between the new balance complete and the pallet fork.

Edited by mbwatch
Posted
58 minutes ago, mbwatch said:

Hey @LittleWatchShop! Do you remember what order these parts go in? Spacer between the hole jewel and cap jewel, or spacer below the hole jewel? I just put a new balance complete in a Waltham Lorsa P72 I had sitting in a box for a year, and however I assembled it last time I get no end shake and no balance movement. I think I had the spacer in between but now I'm wondering if it should have been below the hole jewel.

I can't find a diagram of the Antichoc 102 system anywhere.

 

Also, for whatever it's worth now, my Lorsa P72 also had that loose center wheel jewel that just sits in on the bridge. It was not friction fit, just sat in a recess.

 

 

It does seem to be that the spacer washer goes between the hole jewel and the cap jewel. Without my pallet fork installed and the shock setting in that configuration I'm getting a solid 45sec of free balance movement after a puff of air. So my issue is something between the new balance complete and the pallet fork.

Lol...2.5 years ago. I probably have pictures of the assembly at home. If I remember tomorrow I will take a look

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I probably have pictures of the assembly at home. If I remember tomorrow I will take a look

No need, thank you. I got it figured out - spacer goes between the hole jewel and cap jewel. My problem was bent pallet fork horns, not sure how that happened because it was running before the old hairspring got damaged. I had another pallet fork from a parts movement that was also bent downward and not contacting the roller, so I went back to the first fork and pretty much just said YOLO  and wedged tweezers into the horns. Guess what - it runs perfectly after that. The watch has no sentimental and little monetary value but it was mostly a matter of sunk cost to get it ticking.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If the watch is new, just return it to the seller for a refund or replacement.
    • Keevo, Welcome to the group ! I'm thinking that you have some damage to the hour, and/ or minute wheel. Possibly just a bent, otherwise damaged, or missing tooth.   Your photo didn't post that I can see. I think you'll have to open it to start really finding the issue. Best, Randy
    • An industrial break cleaner , like Holts does a good job of rinsing off paraffin 
    • In cap jewels on several watches I have serviced over the years. I've recently serviced a couple of Longines movements where the cap jewels were colourless. They are a real pain. Without colour they disappear when immersed in any liquid for cleaning 😲 Not necessarily. Cousins do a 10ml bottle for £26 which will last me for years. That's just half the price of a simple Bergeon silicone cushion, so not too expensive 🤣
    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
×
×
  • Create New...