Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I somehow doubt that that's the problem as I've never heard of that before. We really need a picture.

I think I'll test my theories in the future before guessing the outcome. I tried a 343, 344 and 350 in a spares movement and the outcome was the same each time - I could get each battery to not start.

I might try and investigate the capacitor(s) next...

IMG_20220102_155312.thumb.jpg.871ebe4088fdfac0200fed1754fcab71.jpgIMG_20220102_155618.thumb.jpg.64cffb0fef6af1b4cb60e08267dc24eb.jpg998050016_ESA9162circuit.thumb.jpg.3a4f8322f1b08335567378c3cd1ea61a.jpg

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Plato said:

I could get each battery to not start.

Just a clarification so things are clear in my mind. Just to be clear on things you do know that the watch is not necessarily a self-starter. In other words I'm going to snip something out of the service manual for the 218. Notice the reference that you have to give it a start. So in other words it's not a 100% the watch will start with power it sometimes needs a little help and the manual was written with the thought of using a Mercury battery.

218 not necessarily self starting.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Just a clarification so things are clear in my mind. Just to be clear on things you do know that the watch is not necessarily a self-starter. In other words I'm going to snip something out of the service manual for the 218. Notice the reference that you have to give it a start. So in other words it's not a 100% the watch will start with power it sometimes needs a little help and the manual was written with the thought of using a Mercury battery.

218 not necessarily self starting.JPG

So there may be nothing wrong with a tuning fork watch that doesn't start each and every time? Just a quirk of that type of movement? 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Plato said:

So there may be nothing wrong with a tuning fork watch that doesn't start each and every time? Just a quirk of that type of movement? 

Yes exactly there's nothing wrong with the watch.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Yes exactly there's nothing wrong with the watch.

Thanks @JohnR725. I have two nice Omegas that I didn't feel right to sell on thinking they had a problem. I was happy to keep and wear them knowing full well that a little tap would see them run but not good enough for sale. I'm going to keep one and sell the other to fund more projects 🙂

  • 6 months later...
Posted
54 minutes ago, markr said:

What is a good variable power supply for working on Acutrons?

If you want to build it yourself, here is a solution that I found on the web a while back.

I built a simpler variable power supply to work on quartz watches.

Modified Bulova 9920_6604 Variable Power Supply-l.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

If you want to build it yourself, here is a solution that I found on the web a while back.

If I remember right the person of posted this design adapted a Bulova variable power supply which is why it's such a peculiar design.

Then if you're looking for another idea of the simple design here's what I use.

lm10 voltage regulator watch repair.JPG

lm10.pdf

Posted

Is there one I could buy that would work?

5 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

If I remember right the person of posted this design adapted a Bulova variable power supply which is why it's such a peculiar design.

Then if you're looking for another idea of the simple design here's what I use.

lm10 voltage regulator watch repair.JPG

lm10.pdf 2.59 MB · 0 downloads

I might be able to build this if I knew what that thing in the middle was.

Posted

Sorry for late response.  My computer is f upped and wont let me download photos.  Will this meter work and can I build the power supply in it?  Is the power source a 9v battery?  What controls the voltage amount?  I think that I can build it with a little help.

IMG_5167.JPG

IMG_5168.JPG

Posted
16 minutes ago, markr said:

Will this meter work and can I build the power supply in it?

No, the voltage range is too high.  Your power supply maximum voltage is less than two volts.  Now for me, I would build a supply that goes to about 3.2 volts because it would be more general purpose for quartz watches.  But 10 volts is way too high.

The circuit @JohnR725posted is fine for your application.  I would use a digital meter if your only goal is to provide voltage (not measure current).  I will sketch something up for you and post it a little later.

 

Posted (edited)

Use this for your volt meter.

Shown here is a schematic and a layout.  I did not try to make this compact so it is laid out very loose.

Check my work...cranked out pretty fast.

You can download the software used to generate these and order them online.  You get three boards for about $60.  US made and very high quality.

In this layout, the Meter and pot are not intended to be placed on the PCB but shown this way for checking purposes.

The bypass caps are overkill.

If you want to build this, I can PM you the files and a link to the fab.

2022-08-01 16_17_13-ExpressPCB - F__Documents_Docs_Engineering_2016_Projects_LM20 power supply.pcb.png

2022-08-01 16_15_10-ExpressSCH - F__Documents_Docs_Engineering_2016_Projects_LM20 power supply.sch.png

Edited by LittleWatchShop
  • Thanks 2
Posted
3 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

No, the voltage range is too high.  Your power supply maximum voltage is less than two volts.

Yes the problem of normal power supplies are not meant to do watch repair. They will not go typically low enough voltage sometimes a well. They typically go way too high and voltage. Plus they have way too much power out and if you short the leads together you'll have smoke and fire. None of which are nice to have on the watch bench.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks.  I may have someone to help me with this and he may have some parts for me. I'm sure I'll be back with some questions like what is the power source?

Posted

Here is my power supply.  I use a 9V battery inside the box.  The circuit in this box is different than the one posted above.  The box is a stock box, but the front plate was 3D printed.  I had the 10-turn pot in my box-o-parts, so I used it, but it could be a standard pot.

2022-08-02 07_13_32-20220802_071211.jpg ‎- Photos.png

Here is a tighter layout...just because...

The dots are 0.1 inch spacing.

2022-08-02 07_34_07-ExpressPCB - F__Documents_Docs_Engineering_2016_Projects_LM20 power supply.pcb.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Here it is...working.  There is a mistake in the pcb layout.  I cannot believe it. What a dip***t mistake.  Who can find it?

 

2022-08-10 15_10_29-20220810_150733.jpg ‎- Photos.png

I don't know if it's a mistake, but I would have reversed the top and bottom layers of the tracks for easier soldering.

Posted
1 hour ago, HectorLooi said:

I don't know if it's a mistake, but I would have reversed the top and bottom layers of the tracks for easier soldering.

No, that is not it.  These are plated through holes (vias), so soldering from either side works just fine.  There is a more fundamental error.

Posted (edited)
On 8/1/2022 at 1:42 PM, markr said:

Sorry for late response.  My computer is f upped and wont let me download photos.  Will this meter work and can I build the power supply in it?  Is the power source a 9v battery?  What controls the voltage amount?  I think that I can build it with a little help.

IMG_5167.JPG

IMG_5168.JPG

If you want to build the LM10 supply, I will send you the PCB.  You can order the LM10 from a variety of places and the digital meter also if you wish to use it.  The 5K pot is also available at Jameco

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Posted
23 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

No, that is not it.  These are plated through holes (vias), so soldering from either side works just fine.  There is a more fundamental error.

So what's the mistake?

The solder pad of R1 looks strange and the alignment of the holes of C1, R1 are not in a straight line. I don't know what the underside looks like but it doesn't seem to follow the PCB plan.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi Mike I did a ships clock a long while ago, not a Hermle though and without getting the beast in my hands to refresh my memory I can’t recall the timing.  This doesn’t help I know but will start the grey matter turning.
    • Of course it will continue Richard.
    • I have stripped and cleaned a Hermle ships clock. It was just oily, no major faults, and I reassembled it, following my photos in reverse order. The time train is fine but the strike train will not play the ships bell strike for half-past. Ships bells play a four hour sequence for the 'watches' and play double 'ding' for the hour and the double dings plus one for the half past (eg half past the second hour is 'ding-ding' 'ding-ding' 'ding'). Sounds complicated but it isn't really. The strike wheel consists of pairs of bumps (for the ding-ding) and no single bumps. There must me some mechanism on the half-past that lifts the strike lever over one of the bumps so only one ding is played. When I get to a half past, it still plays double ding. I have a feeling it is to do with the lever in front of the rack (there is a sprung attachment  on it) and the position of the wheel (to the right) with the two pins that lets that lever fall, but no matter where I place that wheel I cannot get a single ding at half past! Please can someone help with advice on positioning so I can fix this? BTW Happy Easter 🐣 
    • No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup. The watch has a million problems but I have made solid progress. Impulse jewel replaced. Hairspring didn't match the balance (which also doesn't match the serial) but I got it down into range this weekend with 8 or 10 huge timing washers. Replaced the mainspring, balance and train are nice and free. At this point it is running consistently and in beat at about 160°, the third wheel has a bend that sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so. Remaining amplitude problems may be down to the escapement. The banking pins were way out and it didn't run at all before I started. It has one of the old brass escape wheels rather than steel, and I assume the faces its teeth are probably worn or scored in a way I can't yet fix (or see without a microscope). I know this watch is not going to run above 250° but I am going to keep trying to get above 200. But the best part about this watch? Some unscrupulous person stamped "21 JEWELS" on the train bridge sometime in the past, right on top of the Damascening. It's a 15 jewel movement.
    • I think it would rather be the blast of high current drain that would do the damage. But if used occasionally to maybe fix a mainspring or do dial feet it might be worth trying especially if the mainspring or a replacement couldn’t be found.    Tom
×
×
  • Create New...