Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The spirit level is actually not essential. It doesn't help in squaring up the end of the screw. Unless your grinding surface has been levelled with a spirit level first.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

The spirit level is actually not essential. It doesn't help in squaring up the end of the screw. Unless your grinding surface has been levelled with a spirit level first.

I had not thought about this but I that case it can be helpful. I have a lot of circular spirit levels laying around so I could match the one on the tool to one on the surface even if I can't easily level the grinding surface.

Posted
38 minutes ago, mbwatch said:

I had not thought about this but I that case it can be helpful. I have a lot of circular spirit levels laying around so I could match the one on the tool to one on the surface even if I can't easily level the grinding surface.

I wouldn't bother with the spirit level. Assuming you can get the screw perfectly vertically mounted in the tool,  I doubt the level would be accurate enough.

With my homemade tool, I find hard to get small screws mounted perfectly vertical, so I adjust the feet by eye, then I run it lightly over the lapping film and look where the screw head is marked. Then I just tweak the screws to level it up and repeat. Once you've done it a couple of times, it's quick and easy. I reckon I can polish a screw head in 2-3mins.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

On another post about lathes, I think, engineer's blue was mentioned. Could it be applied to the screw head to help with the visualisation of high points? 

There's no need for blue - it would just make your lapping film dirty 🫣

Here's a screw head I've just run up and down some 9 micron film a couple of times. It's quite clear where it's cutting

WIN_20250209_17_36_41_Pro.thumb.jpg.7261d9ce4e3841ac2a1b18080986b8cf.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
On 2/3/2025 at 3:12 PM, Kalanag said:

The staking set is „qualified for free return and refund“. So I sent it back today and hope for refund. I‘ll let you know.

I received a full refund today 👍

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 6
Posted
14 hours ago, Kalanag said:

I received a full refund today 👍

Good work! Mine came from an eBay seller about six months ago, so not much chance of duplicating your success for me.

  • Sad 1
Posted

@RickTock Are your punches also soft steel? I'm curious to find if some production batches have corners cut, or some sellers unload the faulty QC-failures as I have seen with other tools. But I am no longer tempted to ever buy one of these sets.

  • Like 1
Posted

Not used my set that much, but didn't notice any damage, although to be honest I probably didn't look.

Will check them for hardness tomorrow and report back.

  • Like 3
Posted
18 hours ago, mbwatch said:

@RickTock Are your punches also soft steel? I'm curious to find if some production batches have corners cut, or some sellers unload the faulty QC-failures as I have seen with other tools. But I am no longer tempted to ever buy one of these sets.

Yes, I had the same experience as Kalanag, with the tips of the punches deforming when riveting a balance staff. And the rounded punches need reshaping because they are not rounded all the way to the hole. So the part of the rounded punch that strikes the balance staff might as well be a flat punch. 

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, RickTock said:

Yes, I had the same experience as Kalanag, with the tips of the punches deforming when riveting a balance staff. And the rounded punches need reshaping because they are not rounded all the way to the hole. So the part of the rounded punch that strikes the balance staff might as well be a flat punch. 

That's just stupid, isn't it? 

I mean, it's completely useless then, no? If you have to reshape them to use once and then they deform upon first use.... and if the steel is softer than the balance staff, will it even rivet at all? 

As @praezis wrote, what are all the other buyers doing with it?! 

 

It triggers another thought: how amazing were tool 50-100 years ago!! With much less technology, they produced such precise and robust tools that we still use them today. I just checked my round punches of my old Boley set and there's not the slightest trace from my first balance staff riveting. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Knebo said:

That's just stupid, isn't it? …

Right!

The „secret“ of good punches is the use of hardened tool steel.

Hardening and grinding the 50 punches seems not to be feasible for the price of the Chinese set. Unfortunately, they don’t even use hardenable tool steel.

This should be a quality staking set from China. The price is comparable to that of Cousins‘s „value“ version (made in India).

IMG_7833.thumb.jpeg.b1d34eadc91273adf28a6f05b135c42b.jpeg

11 hours ago, Paul80 said:

…Will check them for hardness tomorrow and report back.

You just need to check with a magnet if the steel is ferromagnetic. If not you are done.

Edited by Kalanag
Posted

Just checked mine and sure enough the punches are not magnetic, I suppose they could be stainless steel which can be quite hard, and they don't easily mark during the file test, so must have some degree of hardness.

Shall start looking for a vintage staking set, that's not too rusty or too expensive, (fat chance on the last one).  I suppose I could just look for a set of stakes as I am sure I saw a review on YouTube comparing new to old and it said the vintage stakes fitted the Chinese tool.

Anyone know if that is correct.

Paul

 

Posted
1 minute ago, tomh207 said:

Measure yours Paul, the most common vintage are 4.7mm as are shiny new bergeon.

 

Tom

Yes, my Boley is also 4.7

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Paul80 said:

as I am sure I saw a review on YouTube comparing new to old and it said the vintage stakes fitted the Chinese tool.

I saw that clown‘s video. He ridiculously tested the upper end for hardness. All quality makers anneal that end of the punch, so it is softer than the hard business end!

His aim was promoting his product for sale, the chinese one.

Frank

Edited by praezis
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, praezis said:

I saw that clown‘s video. He ridiculously tested the upper end for hardness. All quality makers anneal that end of the punch, so it is softer than the hard business end!

His aim was promoting his product for sale, the chinese one.

Frank

Frank, I don't go to Germany anymore. I used to teach in Berlin. But, if I did, I would look you up and buy you a beer.

Edited by LittleWatchShop
  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Knebo said:

Yes, my Boley is also 4.7

Standard American made K&D and Marshall punches are all 4.7mm as well. I believe I have read that the punches from the Indian set sold by Cousins are 5mm and therefore incompatible with basically everything else.

I just found a video where a guy is measuring the Chinese punches with calipers at 5.0mm

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Paul80 said:

I suppose I could just look for a set of stakes as I am sure I saw a review on YouTube comparing new to old and it said the vintage stakes fitted the Chinese tool.

Anyone know if that is correct.

@mbwatch is right. The Chinese Set has 5mm. So the common 4,7mm will not fit and you cann‘t get new replacements from Cousins or other vendors.

Vintage sets with 5mm are rare. The only vintage brand I found so far using 5mm is Helios (Berlin, Germany). EDIT: See comment by tomh207!

Edited by Kalanag
Posted
35 minutes ago, Kalanag said:

 

Vintage sets with 5mm are rare. The only vintage brand I found so far using 5mm is Helios (Berlin, Germany).

Just checked my Helios set and they are 4.7

 

Tom

  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 hours ago, tomh207 said:

Just checked my Helios set and they are 4.7

Meanwhile I asked an Ebay seller of a Helios set to be sure. He also confirmed the 4.7mm. Thanks for correcting me!

Posted

I suppose I could sleeve the Chinese tool so that it will take vintage 4.7mm stakes.  That should be just about doable o

On 2/12/2025 at 7:53 AM, Kalanag said:

Right!

The „secret“ of good punches is the use of hardened tool steel.

Hardening and grinding the 50 punches seems not to be feasible for the price of the Chinese set. Unfortunately, they don’t even use hardenable tool steel.

This should be a quality staking set from China. The price is comparable to that of Cousins‘s „value“ version (made in India).

IMG_7833.thumb.jpeg.b1d34eadc91273adf28a6f05b135c42b.jpeg

You just need to check with a magnet if the steel is ferromagnetic. If not you are done.

Even at that price they don't say the punches are hardened, the only mention of material used is a mention of stainless steel, so they may be no better than the cheap sets.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Paul80 said:

suppose I could sleeve the Chinese tool so that it will take vintage 4.7mm stakes.  That should be just about doable o

I'm not sure you would find sleeves that thin Paul, the usual tube wall thickness I've found is 0.5mm, so that a 1mm diameter reduction. There might be something but it seems very thin.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Paul80 said:

I suppose I could sleeve the Chinese tool so that it will take vintage 4.7mm stakes.  That should be just about doable o

You can get 5mm tube with 0.2mm wall and maybe drill that to 4.7mm 

Think you'd be better drilling it out to 6mm, insert a 6mm tube with 1mm wall. then drill that to the 4.7mm

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Web sites are cheap. Message board are easy. Hosting both is less than 100 usd a year and small advertising would cover most of that.  In the discord group we did some 15 min poc and threw up a couple of different message boards on a domain i host.   The real value is the data / information / hive mind While I'm a rank amateur in watch repair the information and assistance on this board is invaluable. The members on here are friendly, entertaining and a wealth of knowledge This is what needs to be preserved  --Jeff
    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
    • Hi there, welcome here.  
    • yes the advertising revenue should generate money. The question is how much money? Then as far as the cost of the website goes that's relatively easy to determine? all you would have to do to grasp costs and profitability would be to go to the link below and you can actually get a website for free try it out for free I believe you get no advertising initially. They also talk about that they'll help you out they have marketing tools and some sort of paid subscription or something. So I guess were shopping for a whatever just ask them what would a maybe could use this one as an example in other words it's going to look basically identical to this is going to have advertising a paid subscriptions what's it going to cost? After all they want to sell or give us a message board like this they should bill answer the questions as they're the people who did the software for this. Yes they really said you can have a free discussion group at least to start. https://invisioncommunity.com/ I was curious about the monthly supporter thing where exactly do we find that on this message board? A quick search I'm not finding it so obviously I'm not looking in the right place?
×
×
  • Create New...