Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok so another crazy post. Only joking 😉. Most watches that we are aquiring via ebay are tending to suffer from one of three things. Three things that stop beginners in their tracks. And these are the things i most want to learn even in my short learning span.  No. 1 issue- a broken balance staff pivot. No. 2 a missing or broken stem and No. 3 a shafted hairspring. So 1 and 2 is going to require a lathe, not a cheap item . But i managed a good one fully kitted out for 180 Betties, a very lucky find but patience paid off. And lastly No. 3 a hairspring vibrator required possibly, a more expensive item, harder to find and not something the missus should be toying with either. Pun unintended but hey it just came out that way so deal with it. This post is to ask a couple of questions regarding repivoting. Ive watched a few you vids on it so  i have a general idea what to do. The questioning is aimed mostly towards pros and their opinions on how well it works ?  how easy  is it to do ? and what sort of equipment and material is required ? Or is it just better to buy and fit a new staff, bearing in mind a staking set will be needed and thats providing a replacement staff is available. A full staff turning is almost definitely out of the question for the beginner, but I'm game after a few months of lathe practice and a new scope acquisition.  I will be asking about the stem manufacturing and the hairspring replacement in the future if thats ok. Thank you for any comments and advice in advance.  ( Nickelsilver 🙂 )

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

For a balance staff I find I'm as fast making a new one as repivoting; also, with repivoting there are several pitfalls that can turn the job sour and you're left with a useless staff, so you end up making it anyway. I would always make a full drawing before either. Technically, a properly done repivoting is as good as original, there's no reason it would fail or perform less well.

 

For trickier parts like a pinion, it is usually far faster and easier to repivot than remake.

9 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

A full staff turning is almost definitely out of the question for the beginner, but I'm game after a few months of lathe practice and a new scope acquisition. 

Doing a correct repivoting of a balance staff isn't easier than making a whole staff, it's just possibly quicker, but in my experience not really unless it's an ultra high grade staff (or marine chronometer or something). Getting the staff running perfectly true to drill, drilling a truly concentric hole that is straight and to proper depth, making the plug with the correct friction fit, fitting the plug, then turning the plug to final size and form and length, finally finishing off in the Jacot*- there are a lot of skills wrapped up there.

 

*using the Jacot you really find out if your plug was fitted correctly!

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

For a balance staff I find I'm as fast making a new one as repivoting; also, with repivoting there are several pitfalls that can turn the job sour and your're left with a useless staff, so you end up making it anyway. I would always make a full drawing before either. Technically, a properly done repivoting is as good as original, there's no reason it would fail or perform less well.

 

For trickier parts like a pinion, it is usually far faster and easier to repivot than remake.

Doing a correct repivoting of a balance staff isn't easier than making a whole staff, it's just possibly quicker, but in my experience not really unless it's an ultra high grade staff (or marine chronometer or something). Getting the staff running perfectly true to drill, drilling a truly concentric hole that is straight and to proper depth, making the plug with the correct friction fit, fitting the plug, then turning the plug to final size and form and length, finally finishing off in the Jacot*- there are a lot of skills wrapped up there.

 

*using the Jacot you really find out if your plug was fitted correctly!

Thanks Nicklesilver very informative and helpful as always. I would love to learn to do both  if at all possible, i was under an assumption that the repivot might have been a little easiler. I'm  expecting some heavy practicing and probably a few years down the line before i could turn out anything half decent, but i am patient, the skill will either come or it wont, if i dont try then it definitely wont. Thanks again.

  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)

Hi again here,

Old thread, but if still interessed in repivoting wersus new staff turning, I can give my 5p here.

This is not my routine way of balance staff turning, but I haven't made routine turning video, just this one I have. But it shows the technic I use when needed to work on T rest.

The repivoting of balance staff is something I generally don't recommend as prefered way. You can see the balance in the video is useless and I used it just to show the process, as a friend asked me to.

Repivoting takes about 10 minutes to me and saves dissassembling and reassembling of the balance. Staff turning usually takes 30 min. and then assembling, trueing, poising checks and so on may be another 30. The both ways usually will reqire regulation of the balance, but it strongly depends on what is expected as watch performance - is it needed to be chronometer-like adjusted or just good strong beat is enough.

Another helpfull video shows how to take off the brokend old balance staff from the balance, when it is the riveted type.

This all are simple phone recorded videos, so quality of the record is bad, but anyway, I hope, still can be helpfull

Edited by nevenbekriev
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Posted
33 minutes ago, nevenbekriev said:

Hi again here,

Old thread, but if still interessed in repivoting wersus new staff turning, I can give my 5p here.

This is not my routine way of balance staff turning, but I haven't made routine turning video, just this one I have. But it shows the technic I use when needed to work on T rest.

The repivoting of balance staff is something I generally don't recommend as prefered way. You can see the balance in the video is useless and I used it just to show the process, as a friend asked me to.

Repivoting takes about 10 minutes to me and saves dissassembling and reassembling of the balance. Staff turning usually takes 30 min. and then assembling, trueing, poising checks and so on may be another 30. The both ways usually will reqire regulation of the balance, but it strongly depends on what is expected as watch performance - is it needed to be chronometer-like adjusted or just good strong beat is enough.

Another helpfull video shows how to take off the brokend old balance staff from the balance, when it is the riveted type.

This all are simple phone recorded videos, so quality of the record is bad, but anyway, I hope, still can be helpfull

Appreciate the reply on an old post nev, yes helpful videos thank you. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi guys. @VWatchie Those images are self hosted (not hosted on this server). Do a look at the page source and you will see this. I’m afraid, I can’t have control or backup images not hosted on this server. ( They seem to be served from here: https://qehvsw.bn.files.1drv.com/) This server is backed up fully every night and the database is backed up and versioned every hour, all stored off site on Amazon S1 platform. It’s hard for us to lose data. Ive got a huge overhead of space on this particular server the site is served from so no worries there 🙂 Sorry all for lack of response so far, I have been extremely busy and am embarrassed to say that priorities had to be set in place for a while.  Be assured that i’ve got constant monitoring and alerts should the site be in an extended problematic state (down etc) and work on these issues if they arise.
    • Web sites are cheap. Message board are easy. Hosting both is less than 100 usd a year and small advertising would cover most of that.  In the discord group we did some 15 min poc and threw up a couple of different message boards on a domain i host.   The real value is the data / information / hive mind While I'm a rank amateur in watch repair the information and assistance on this board is invaluable. The members on here are friendly, entertaining and a wealth of knowledge This is what needs to be preserved  --Jeff
    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
    • Hi there, welcome here.  
×
×
  • Create New...