Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys, it's been a month or so since I last picked your brains. During this time I've been beavering away with a few projects & getting my workstation fit for purpose. 50fd1c2977770dafb29367b7a2ba9e1c.jpg

As a few may remember, I picked up a sweat little longines 164c154e8031fd55a174e89ddb07473a.jpgthat was gaining 1hr+ per day & would stop intermittently. After a complete strip down, service & regulating e6bc9aae2cc0d7e3a10a107f30466607.jpgthe beautiful little eta 2671 now runs like a champ. However, I'm wondering on the timegraph I'm still seeing 0.2ms beat error, but 0 s/d gain. Would you guys leave it alone now & say job done or try to get the beat error correct? 7737ca2b9fe621b367241dbae0e0ec9a.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Leave it alone, you've done an excellent job and your workstation looks the business too! :). That reminds me, I must tidy mine up soon.

Posted

Personally I would leave alone. it depends how easy it is to adjust the beat, if it is adjusted by moving the hairspring collet I would definitely leave.

But some might but not me.

Posted

Thanks for the advice guys. If it's not losing or gaining how exactly does the beat error affect the time keeping /running of the watch.

Posted

If the beat error is out significantly, the watch will either not run, be a pig to start and require a shake, or it will be prone to stopping. It can still keep good time provided the beat error is constant.

Posted

Oh OK, I'll leave it alone & let the wife use it, then check it again in a few weeks. Thanks guys

That's a good idea.

What you get on the timegrapher and when your wife is wearing it will more than likely be different due to positional errors. Hopefully it won't be much as worry about. It's not the first time I have had to calibrate a watch to me after setting it up on the bench.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks Mark, I contacted the seller to see if they have any more info on separating the case.
    • Hi all, I've engaged here a couple of times over the years but never introduced myself. I've been restoring vintage timepieces for 15+ years and focus mostly on 1940s-1980s wristwatches. The farther gone it is, the more I enjoy bringing it back to life. Every now and then I come across something uncommon that I want to share that others my find interesting.  Or sometimes I come across a challenge that I haven't run into before, so I enjoy reaching out to others who I can learn from. Best, g2w
    • Very interesting! I answered the mail from Longines, explaining that I was a bit disappointed and that I wouldn't ask for a costly confirmation for a watch which isn't a high-end one ... and I received another email explaining that they couldn't not certify the authenticity of the watch, but they could specify that, according to the serial number on the caliber and to their handwritten records, the watch was produced in 1938. Great! @Mercurial I will take the measurements and will keep you informed. Thank you all. This forum is incredible 👍
    • Good stuff, thanks!!!  I'm going to save it and re-read your post and watch the video again.  I have a few follow-up question:  My understanding is that the spring vibrates or breathes between the the two regulator pins. When the pins are fully open the effective spring length is from the stud and theoretically no rate adjustment can be made by moving the regulator arm. As the pins are closed the spring gets closer to one side of the regulator block but doesn't touch a pin. You can still move the regulator carrier the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils.  The rate can now be adjusted using the regulator because the effective spring length can be modified.  My question is: Does the hairspring bounce off and touch one of the pins as it breathes? Is that why the effective hairspring length is adjusted by moving the regulator?  And follow-up: How is amplitude affected by the spring between the pins? Does fully open pins, dial up position = max amplitude?  When spring adjusted to 1/2 width still = max amplitude? When I have crown down gravity is pulling the spring against one of the pins and I would expect rate to go up and amplitude to go down. Is that correct?
    • A quick Google for Longines 25.17 found several similar watches - like this one with writing on the case back similar to yours https://benjaminmarcello.nl/product/longines-cal-25-17-tank-from-1938/
×
×
  • Create New...