Jump to content

Lume Rot on Seiko 7548 Hands - Best Option?


Recommended Posts

Greetings fellow horologists.

Would there be a lume doctor in the house? Hope everyone's keeping well. 

I've got this Seiko 7548-700B that, aside from a clean movement that's absolutely rust free, the hands seemed to have had a kickboxing bout with the mold monster and came out the loser. As you will see on the succeeding pictures, rot had crept in from the edges of the hands and worked its way towards the lume.

My intention for the watch is to restore it to its original glory with keeping all parts OEM as much as possible. The crystal will have to be replaced and the gaskets as well but my dilemma is what to do with the hands.

Options dancing around my head:

  • Remove original lume, clean and polish the hands and relume. It'll be weird because the markers won't light up while the hands will. 
  • Lightly scrape off molds. Then, dab with cotton swab (Q-tips) moist with household bleach in the hopes it will bleach the black gunk.
  • Just leave it alone and bask on its originality. The Seiko DNA remains intact.

What about you guys? What would you do?

A definite conundrum.

Thanks so much.

Jesse

 

IMG_6305.JPG

IMG_6379.JPG

IMG_6380.JPG

IMG_6386.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I shouldn't talk because I've been known to throw originality out the window in favour of looks. But it's one of those things where either you go all out or you leave it. Having pretty hands but tired lume on the dial and bezel pip will look worse in my opinion. and the thing is, bleaching might work on one dial but will ruin another - you can just never predict these things. Personally? I'd remove the old bits and keep them somewhere safe and replace with new parts. If you pass the watch on, the buyer can decide what he wants without you potentially ruining original parts.

EDIT: Just removing the lume on the hands and polishing them won't work out like you hope. The plating on the hands have been compromised, so you'll have to replate them as well. This from my own experience, YMMV

Edited by gbyleveldt
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, gbyleveldt said:

I guess I shouldn't talk because I've been known to throw originality out the window in favour of looks. But it's one of those things where either you go all out or you leave it. Having pretty hands but tired lume on the dial and bezel pip will look worse in my opinion. and the thing is, bleaching might work on one dial but will ruin another - you can just never predict these things. Personally? I'd remove the old bits and keep them somewhere safe and replace with new parts. If you pass the watch on, the buyer can decide what he wants without you potentially ruining original parts.

EDIT: Just removing the lume on the hands and polishing them won't work out like you hope. The plating on the hands have been compromised, so you'll have to replate them as well. This from my own experience, YMMV

Fair point. It does look like getting replacements, whether OEM or Aftermarket, is on the radar and I plan on changing the bezel as well but it has to be the pepsi bezel.

What I think will drive me crazy is the lume on the replacement hands that for sure will luminate in the dark whilst the rest of the hour markers will be dormant. Maybe I can remove the lumes on the new hands and just replace it with flat lume like material, plus I have to colour match it to the rest of the markers.

Thanks for your response. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 1:44 PM, HouseofGeorge said:

My intention for the watch is to restore it to its original glory with keeping all parts OEM as much as possible. The crystal will have to be replaced and the gaskets as well but my dilemma is what to do with the hands.

If you want to "restore it to its original glory" and replace the bezel, I would replace the lume and paint the seconds hand.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/3/2022 at 1:47 AM, mikepilk said:

If you want to "restore it to its original glory" and replace the bezel, I would replace the lume and paint the seconds hand.

That's right. What about the hands though, how would you clean it? Just scrape off the gunk from the metal and remove the lume? It will have to be re-plated to a shiny silver/chrome finish. The seconds hand would be an easy paint with flat white and flat black.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had similar looking hands on my 7548.  I removed the rotted lume and relumed them.  The silver plating on the hands is very thin and won's survive any polishing.  Some have used Magic Rhodium on the hands to bring back the silver.  This product seems to have disappeared from the US market.  You can't do anything to repair the pitting. 

I did just enough to remove the lume and corrosion.  The inside edges were gently cleaned as much as possible without disturbing the plating.  I have hands that look like they have been around the block but are perfectly readable day and night.  I work a lot at night and I need lume.  I make no apologies for have watches that are usable.  Acetone is the only solvent I've found that reliably removes Seiko lume. 

Some of the after market hands I have used lately have been junk.  They pressed on too easily and thina a tissue paper.  On one watch they have slipped out of place and need to be replaced.  I'll take worn looking Seiko hands over after market any day. 

The 7548 and 6309 hands are flat and have sharp edges.  Most reproductions have rounded edges and corners that just don't look right. 

On your bezel, you may find the little plastic circle pushed into the hole.  Having that little bit goes a long way to improving the look of the bezel. I use UV cure varnish as used on fishing flies to mix lume paste for these.  It waterproofs the lume powder and glues the pip in place. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi there Mathew, welcome to the forum.  
    • I often think about painting clear varnish on the coil.
    • I hate this battery release design in Ronda movements. It's an accident waiting to happen. One slip and the coil is gone. I wonder if it's a deliberate design.
    • so let's break this down the words restaffed balance wheel correctly would mean no distortion at all on the balance wheel. Which can be done but often isn't. Oftentimes balance wheels end up and times particularly discussing a bimetallic all bent up like the one in this discussion. If the balance wheel is out of round you definitely get a poise issue. You also get an issue if somebody pleases and out around balance wheel and then you fix the out of round now the wheel is poised incorrectly because somebody didn't physically make sure the balance wheel was correct in the first place. Yes people really do poise balance wheels that are neither flat or round it's quite annoying and then it typically with anything vintage there's an extreme likelihood of timing issues. Like the fun I had yesterday the wall thumb was 400 seconds fast and had a 202nd positional problem. So yes it's extremely common on vintage watches you're going to have things to fix from prior inappropriate repairs typically and it depends upon how it nitpicky you want to be here. In other words if you are statically poising the definition of poised would be if you give the balance wheel of push it will rotate eventually come to a stop and it will not rock back and forth at all is considered perfectly poised. Typically when I poise I don't worry about that I will let it rock back and forth because it still going to be within 15 seconds typically. Now the problem with statically poising absolutely perfectly is that it does not take into account the hairspring. This is why ideally if you are really obsessed you statically poise until your close and then finish with dynamic poising. This will take into account the hairspring collet that's probably not a poised collet. Yes Hamilton had another companies had poised collet's they hairspring itself affects the poise so for absolute perfect you have to dynamic poise. So the suggestion has been that it absolutely poised dynamically done balance wheel will not be statically poise absolutely perfectly.    this is an interesting one? In the United States of America over a time span and I don't remember the exact but it ended in the 60s there was a tear off on watches to protect the American watch industry. I've read the books on the tariffs specifications it would bump up the cost of better watches to making them expensive. This is why you will often see a nice Omega watch for instance that was regulated was adjusted and was still keeping really good time will be marked not adjusted. Because the quantity of jewels each jewel bumped up the cost adjustment adjustment and variety of positions bumped up the cost so a huge percentage of watches imported into this country will be not adjusted but they were adjusted at the factory it's just a terra thing then I suspect that even the cheapest of watches probably were somewhat adjusted because if they had zero adjustments I have no idea how bad the timekeeping would be? It's one of the problems of we don't actually have numbers of what the watches really should be doing we only have numbers of timekeeping basically when timing machines exist or for things like railroad grade watches where they absolutely had to know what the timekeeping is doing. So railroad timekeeping specification in this country is of watch Dependent up has to be within plus or -30/2 per week. Which if you compare it to the specifications of chronometer grade will ask which I think could be up to six seconds a day is better than a Rolex. this is one of my amusements at work. There we have that really nice which he timing machine full automatic microphone we look at every single watch and six positions and my boss once the watches all the keep really good time. So basically the watchmakers have learned to let the boss adjust the watches it seems to make him happy and we can do other things like service watches. So yesterday's fun on the 18 size Waltham to get the 400 timing down to think he got it down to 15 seconds it might've been better than that the Delta was still might've been within a minute much better than what it was before but still took more than an hour of time. When we don't specifically charge for this we charge for servicing of the watch we do not typically charge to make your watch keep time in multiple positions so yes it wastes a lot of time unless you're getting paid for it where it can definitely eat up a lot of time to fix vintage watches that I've had interesting repair histories. sorry I don't remember the brand name we once had a watch that was one of I take 1000 it actually was engraved number or something of something in other words it was a very expensive Swiss watch and I believe there was at least one shim under something. I always think of at the factory level if you have to place a shim to me it's a sign of poor manufacturing but there was a Swiss watch a nice watch that had it done. Of course what it may also be a sign of limited quantity of watches where things or adjusted at the factory we end up with interesting problems and I will pick on American pocket watches again with interesting repairs that can happen? For instance pocket watches dropped balance staff is broken possibly the whole jewels are broken and sometimes cap stones get broken. or worst-case I had a Hamilton 992 it actually had little notches taken out of the main plate I always wonder if it got hit by a train and things were dramatically bent in this watch somebody had ground the pallet fork bridge down to accommodate the balance wheel because the balance bridge had been bent to insane proportions it was bent so much it was no longer up and down in alignment so I always wondered if this particular watch got hit by a train. With its ultimate repair it would've been better to just replace the whole movement but instead we cannibalized another movements to replace all of the horribly mutilated parts. Now back to not watches hit by a train while somebody was crossing the railroad track. If the balance jewels are broken they are replaced but the same problem like we have on this group where do you get replacements? This means people in the field will get creative if they replace things with size differently than the original things will change. In other words the total length of the balance staff conceivably will change because they've changed the jewels and they're not properly sized. Then there's a problem of replacement balance staffs I personally have often theorized in the case of  bestfit  that they deliberately made the staffs oversize so the watchmaker can reduce the size. But what if you don't have a lay then what happens? A for instance the Hamilton 992B only has one balance staff as it's of friction staff but often times the friction staff doesn't fit because the replacement staff is slightly oversize which should be impossible but it happens. Often times I have to go through an assortment of staffs to find one that fits because I don't feel like reducing at the size to fit. More common though would be staffs with pivots that are too long and if the watchmaker does not have a lathe again how do they fix that problem well undesirable for us that have to deal with it down the road so an ideal perfect world the adjusted by the factory to whatever the specification was at the time and on a seven jewel American pocket watch it's not going to be railroad timekeeping. If we replace the staff in a proper fashion without bending or distorting anything the watch should keep time within the specification when it was originally made except of course we don't know what the specification was and they definitely did not have timing machines when this watch was made. If we replace the balanced staff with a factory original factory staff and everything should fit perfectly if the jewels were broken and we used factory jewels everything once again would be perfect. Although if you look in the parts book typically for American pocket watches for certain parts they recommend sending the entire watch or parts of the watch back because American watch manufacturing at least until the not sure exact date but sometime past the 20s definitely by the 50s watches were made in batches which is why everything has a serial number and the tools over the course of the batch tend to wear a little bit. So conceivably something made at the beginning and the end of the batch may not fit without adjustments. Plus of course there's variations in parts I like the pic on Elgin because they have one balance staff that comes in four different size variations and then a whole bunch of pivot variations all with the same part number so yes and an absolute perfect world which doesn't exist changing a balance staff with everything factory new would not require poising or truing the balance wheel because everything should still be perfect. But unfortunately in the 100+ year life of your watch things have happened. If you want to grasp that go back and start on page 1 of this discussion as the balance wheels in this discussion have had issues they're not flat the probably out of round there were issues with the jewels there is issues possibly with the staffs. Oh and yes apparently there's a donor watch and if the donor watch is not within a very close serial number range of the original watch it will have very likely sizing differences especially for anything related to the balance wheel because all the vintage watches were adjusted individually in the factory. If you look at a video on I can find it if you want to watch it on YouTube from I believe the 30s where you will see on escapement related stuff every single watch is adjusted which is why you can't just grab the balance wheel from one watch shove it into another one as they were adjusted at the factory                    
    • I see a lot of URLs pointing to 1drv.com which appears to be a CDN for OneDrive.
×
×
  • Create New...