Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all

doing my very first full repair on a balance staff/wheel assy. which includes removing the broken staff to replace it, roller table to re-shellack the impulse pin, clean, poise, truing, etc etc. After i removed the bad staff I noticed in the balance arm bore looks kinda ragged. my questions are: do I take a jeweling reamer or broach to remove those or proceed with staking the new staff in and prepare for riveting? 

2nd question: looks like the old pivot measures .12mm and the new one is .13mm will i need to remove that extra .1mm? i'm thinking I do but all I have is a Levin pivot polisher, a few ruby and steel burnishers. I have no lathe. pic #1 shows the burrs.

balance wheel 1.jpg

balance wheel 2.jpg

Posted

 You might try to put the staff on the mainplate and tighten the cock screws to find the answer yourself, I think there be no need to shorten the staff, not for  .01 mm anyway. You would lose the original fine polish and gain nothing instead.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
18 hours ago, MechanicMike said:

my questions are: do I take a jeweling reamer or broach to remove those or proceed with staking the new staff in and prepare for riveting?

It's really hard to tell in your picture how bad that really is try a toothpick something soft do not use anything metal on the hole.

Out of curiosity how did you remove the old staff?

18 hours ago, MechanicMike said:

2nd question: looks like the old pivot measures .12mm and the new one is .13mm will i need to remove that extra .1mm? i'm thinking I do but all I have is a Levin pivot polisher, a few ruby and steel burnishers. I have no lathe. pic #1 shows the burrs.

What you should do is try the new staff in the jewel to see how it fits. There is no guarantee that the old staff was the right size if somebody had already restaffed the watch. Then I'm attaching an image that kinda gives you a clue if you put a new staff in it should have so much lean. Then you have to check both jewels because sometimes they end up being different sizes somebody might have changed one and didn't put the right size back in.

Also it's important to measure all of the dimensions on the old staff and compared to the new staff just to make sure that everything else is the right size to avoid unpleasant surprises.

 

staff side shake new.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Posted
23 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 You might try to put the staff on the mainplate and tighten the cock screws to find the answer yourself, I think there be no need to shorten the staff, not for  .01 mm anyway. You would lose the original fine polish and gain nothing instead.

 

 

thanks Joe I never thought of that! 

5 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Out of curiosity how did you remove the old staff?

ah sharp eye you've got there John. I was waiting for this question lol...I don't have a lathe to undercut the rivet before staking it out so I used my staff remover tool. it came out nice and easy but did I make those burrs? sure possibly. I tried to get better pics but can only do so much with my phone. sorry. the burrs aren't terribly bad but the machinist in me wants to remove them. I'll try the non metallic trick you mentioned. examine the pics again and compare pic #1 to pic #2. that's about the only way i could get some sort of contrast on the burrs. I'll see if I can try something else.

I had tried the new staff in the jewels and they fit but because this ones my first I have nothing to compare the "feel" to in checking for end/side shake. the old staff upper pivot was completely gone and the lower was bent but was able to obtain somewhat of a diameter off it. I'm going to go back and do what Joe described above to check for fit, endplay etc. etc. check jewels re-measure.

6 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

a toothpick something soft

got just the thing-a tiny plastic toothpick. I'll try pegging it with that. and a wooden one of course.

Posted

all done! thanks for the help guys. John I went ahead and gave the pegging thing a try but no luck. so heres what I did: First of all, under closer magnification I found out they weren't burrs, but stake marks. 3 of them spaced around the diameter. Have you ever seen that before? staking the bore on a balance wheel?

I have a jeweler's countersink in my staking kit that, along with a jewel reamer I gently teased the stake marks from the bore. riveted the new staff in and it worked great. again, thanks.

repaired balance wheel #1.jpg

repaired balance wheel #2.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will definitely look for interference when I open it back up. You make good points.  The part that makes me wonder is the fact that it snaps around well if I do it during the day whilst I'm wear it and assume it has more 'wind' than at midnight. 
    • I doubt it is due to lack of amplitude.  My 7750 - which I haven't serviced yet because the numbers were OK (and I am still scared of chronographs!)- has no problem flipping the date with an amplitude closer to 250º On other movements I have had issues where the plate(s) that go over the calendar wheel interfere.  I did an FHF ST 96-4 last week where there are 2 tiny plates plus a larger plate that hold the calendar wheel in place and I had real problems getting the calendar wheel to snap around nicely.  Lubrication on the points of the teeth of the calendar wheel and making sure the small plates were aligned properly was the solution there.
    • Well I spoke too soon. Here's where I am now with this issue. I replaced the date jumper and all seemed to function correctly. Fully wound and only in the movement holder, no dial or hands, I let it sit untouched for two days. Both nights it advanced the date. The second night it might have been just shy of fully advanced. Seemed as though I fixed it, so I reassembled the watch. Three nights in a row the date did not advance. Once I pull the crown it does. So you might think that it's the dial interfering, but here's the weird thing. If I advance the date during the day to 11:57p and watch it get to 12:00:30a the date flips with gusto. So here's what I'm thinking and could use your council. I installed a new Swiss mainspring. I used Moebius 8217 braking grease on the barrel walls. It seems to wind quite a bit before slipping, but does slip.  I've read that the 7750 really needs Kluber p125 as a braking grease.  Do you think it just doesn't have enough power after a few to several hours of sitting before the date change? Here are the TG numbers after service:  Rate +1s/d,    Amp 301,    BE 0.0ms   
    • I've managed with the ones I have but 1.8 mm would be better. 
    • Parts weren’t readily interchangeable when this watch was made, and almost every part was adjusted by hand to fit the rest of the parts in that specific watch. That said, it can save time to harvest a part from a donor movement so you can modify it to fit a similar movement, rather than try to make the part from scratch.  With that in mind, it is possible that the click from this watch was removed for use in another watch. I doubt that the other missing parts were taken for use as donor parts. The cannon pinion would be removed properly, rather than snapping it off with the centre wheel arbour and pin inside it.  The Maltese cross stop works were probably removed by a lazy or less knowledgeable watchmaker servicing the watch.  It is very common to encounter otherwise functional watches (including very high end pieces) that are missing their stop work because a previous watchmaker didn’t know how to set it up when reassembling the movement, or was too lazy to bother and knew that the customer would probably never notice.  It is possible that the stop work parts were taken to be fitted to a watch that was missing them.  Best Regards, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...