Jump to content

An Olma From The 1940S

WillFly

By WillFly
in Your Watch Collection

 Share

Recommended Posts

WillFly Distinguished Member

WillFly

Posted
Posted

Cheapskate that I am, I can't resist picking up a cheapie on eBay now and then and, for not much more than the price of a round of drinks, got this watch from the 1940s - which arrived this morning. The make is "Olma", a Swiss brand registered in 1926 but now obviously owned by an Asian company. Olma was probably in the lower half of the Swiss watchmaking hierarchy, using good, dependable movements. The one in this watch is an AS 1287 - pre-incabloc, with a typical 1940s, quasi-military dial.

 

post-64-0-89820700-1433862172_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-44976100-1433862176_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
WillFly Distinguished Member

WillFly

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It's always tempting to try to repair some of the obvious signs of age - case, crystal, dial, hands, etc. In this instance, the dial is good and the hands are passable. (The strap came fitted new by the seller). But I'm always cautious in these cases.

 

The case rear is good - quite well chromed and clean - which leaves the bezel and the crystal. The bezel is of a gold-finished base metal and is well "brassed". Not much can be done there other than re-chrome it - which I won't do because it's not worth it. But I might try some very careful and gentle polishing with Autosol. The crystal is high-domed - typical for its period - and has slight scratching across the surface, but is not yellowed (being glass). So I'm actually inclined to leave it - unusual for me because I normally like to replace them.

 

The movement was serviced by the seller - whatever that might mean. It was set by me this morning and is currently correct almost to the second, and the regulator is almost bang in the middle of the -/+ mark. So - no messing with this one.

 

It is what it is - a nice, simple, 75-year old wristwatch that cost me very little.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
oldhippy Distinguished Member

oldhippy

Posted
Posted

Good old robust movements AS1287. I haven't a clue on how many of these movements I've repaired. I also had an abundance of spares. Nice clean and clear dial. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BlueHarp
      Longines with 25.17 caliber

      By BlueHarp · Posted

      Bad news: Longines doesn't provide this service free of charge any longer. I have to ask for an extract from the archives or a certificate of authenticity, but I'm afraid it's not worth the cost for this watch. Too bad 🥴
    • Malocchio
      Replacing crystal, do I need a bezel tool?

      By Malocchio · Posted

      Tool for removing or pressing the bezel? Most likely you have to remove the bezel (with a knife) before removing old crystal or inserting a new one. You can press the bezel with the crystal press if you have a suitable die with straight walls or otherwise a die that has enough clearance that it doesn't touch the crystal when pressing the bezel.
    • Neverenoughwatches
      Diy rotary cleaning machine

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      Brake cleaner even.
    • zx6rfool
      Replacing crystal, do I need a bezel tool?

      By zx6rfool · Posted

      This will be my first crystal replacement, I have a press, but looking at the watch I wonder if I might need a bezel tool also. Any and all help appreciated. 
    • JohnR725
      Etachron regulation system

      By JohnR725 · Posted

      I'm not entirely sure you fully understand what he's doing in the video. For one thing he's giving examples of things like about 16 minutes he talks about opening up the regulator just a little bit. Opening up the regulator slows the watch down to compensate for that he moves the regulator fast and now it's keeping time again but the regulator pins are too far apart. I have an image down below on top of it shows the effect of regulator pins and amplitude. If the regulator pins are farther apart than the example down below then at a higher amplitude timekeeping will be much worse. Why the regulator pins are supposed to be adjusted as an average rule approximately twice the thickness of the mainspring itself. In other words if you look at the spacing it have one half of the hairspring thickness on either side of the hairspring itself. There is like he talks about the video a little bit of adjustment here and there. So in his example where he opened them up it will really dramatically screw up timekeeping based on amplitude. Then when you get to the 20 some minutes like you say he is adjusting the regulator pins closer together to get a more even timekeeping based on amplitude and amplitude changes are caused by going to various positions. Then and the other example of the image down below regulator pins too far apart and they hairspring is not centered and look what that does the timekeeping. So hairspring is supposed to be centered regulator pins are supposed to properly spaced. Then you get reasonably even timekeeping like it shows in the upper image. It's not like we're regulating out positional errors like poising errors because that's something entirely different.   In the part number above and in the video both of you left off details. I which version of either of your watches I will just make you's timing specifications for your watch down below may specify how you're supposed to do it other words you wind up the watch fully wound up you wait 10 to 60 minutes in the four positions it should be within 60 seconds. Yes it can be closer but you may not actually get zero.     Now let's compare with the 2892 and see where we might have a discrepancy. First off we have a problem of which one is a using did he use the chronometer grade 1 or the top grade or what?  None is basically just much tighter timing tolerances. So when he's using an example watch conceivably might be a chronometer grade watch then things are going to be much more  perfect than what you're going to see.       NH35_TG.pdf ETA 2892-A2 Manufacturing info.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...