Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

CAS for the benzine that everyone uses for watchmaking purposes in Switzerland is 64742-49-0. "Naphtha (petroleum), hydrotreated light"

That's the stuff I use. It also has "SBP3" after the CAS.

I use it to do a quick ultrasonic pre-wash on really dirty movements, for cleaning watch bracelets, and hand washing mainsprings (can't figure out how to hold them to clean in the ultrasonic)

  • 1 year later...
Posted
56 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Specific gravity, an old unit of density. The Specific gravity of water is 1 so the benzene is less dense. 

I thought the modern water density measurement is 1 tonne per cubic metre.?

3 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I thought the modern water density measurement is 1 tonne per cubic metre.?

Sp. gr. ?  Something per gram ?

Posted

Specific gravity is now called relative density.  Set water at 1 and compare solids and liquids to it. The density if brass is appropriately 8500 kg/m³ so it's relative density is 8.5 etc. Gasses are compared to air, air equals 1.

  • Thanks 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted

I have a degree in chemistry and words like "naphtha" and "ligroin" would cause us fits in school when we were trying to figure out what they were. We used them in organic chemistry as solvents. Most things in organic chemistry are named so clearly that you would know exactly what atoms were in the compound and often how the atoms were oriented.

In any case, it's my understanding that naphtha and ligroin are created by fractional distillation of petroleum. You get molecules with a specific range of carbon atoms in the distillate, and then you desulphur the distillate. The name comes from people who are making industrial fuels and solvents and are chemical engineers and not "chemists" and so the terms are a little more squishy. And historic.

That's just the perspective of someone who had to deal with those solvents in chemistry lab.

I liked reading through this and wondered how to see if my solvent was too dirty. I don't want to switch it out for every watch, especially since I'm working on broken watches from ebay. Just putting a drop on a mirror is much easier than the optical scattering device I was thinking of building.

I really need to find a real watch cleaner though.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I laughed at your comment because I am a Chemical Engineer and you comments are correct.  My chemistry is good compared to the general population but poor compared to a chemist. We basically let you do the chemistry and scale it up.  

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks Mark, but can we still discuss the other important matter please and not be distracted from it. Thank you.
    • You're probably not going to see a dramatic change but you should probably figure out what the lift angle is as it probably is not 52°
    • In tandem with my last post regarding the removal of Google Adsense on this website - I have also decided to fully self fund this site as a gift to the watch repair community of which I’ve been a member of, and have benefited from since being extremely lucky to gain an apprenticeship back in the late 80s.    Well, that means that I have also closed down my Patreon account - or, to be clear, stopped all future transactions on my Patreon account and this is with immediate and permanent effect.    not to mention, but I will, I really really do appreciate the contribution all my patreon and PayPal supporters have provided over the years, you guys have been absolutely awesome and helped to keep this forum alive and available for those who might not be able to afford the payments.    again, from the bottom of my heart thank you.     
    • My pleasure. I would rather pay more than have those annoying ads ruin this site. They were a terrible idea and something I never even saw much, but I was on my iPad yesterday testing a security update for the forum software and it was impossible. I decided then - they had to go!!! Also, co-incided with this, for those who are paying for pattern in order to help fund this site - I’ve just disabled patreon. Future monthly payments will not be taken.  PayPal is a little more complicated. I will try to work out how to cancel the few subscriptions but if you are a PayPal donator then please feel free to cancel the monthly sub.  I will, however thank you all from the bottom of my heart for helping to contribute to this site financially - it means a lot. But going forward, I’m funding it personally from my pocket and that’s the end of it 😄
    • Thank you Mark it definitely makes the site looked much nicer. Although I didn't mind the ads as long as it helped to pay for the messageboard but sometimes when you had the feeling that there were more ads than message board yes it was a little annoying. Thank you
×
×
  • Create New...