Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently got done servicing my 7750 movement, and it has been giving me issues. The timeographer reading shows no issues, a little more positional variation than I'd like, but otherwise getting around +8 seconds a day. However, with the hands on, it seems to be loosing 5 minutes an hour, sporadically. I replaced the mainspring when I serviced it, I don't know if that's the issue, or what it could be. Could the canon pinion need tightening? Or should I do a complete tear down again and start over?

 

Any ideas are great help!

Thanks!

Posted

It has occured to me that this could be a loose cannon pinion, and probably is, considering how smoothly the hands move. Any advice on how to tighten one properly on a staking set? Sadly I don't have a pin vise.

Posted

If you have no cannon pinion tighter then I highly recommend this.

 

post-234-0-23294700-1434695286.png

 

 

Although pricey it's versatile fitting all canon pinion sizes and the most important thing control.

I have some special anvils that fit to my Seitz jeweling tool which I use because of the control issue.

If you sneeze the cannon to much your in a host of trouble.

Posted

This is not a tool for use with the 7750. There is an indirect cannon pinion driver that has a slipping clutch, if this is slipping, I suspect it will have to be replaced. Here is a picture of it from Lawson's post.

post-124-0-63881800-1434699006_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Good reminder Geo should have remembered this set up for the 7750. This is the part that also needs a good lube because if it is seized other problems happen

Posted

Agreed - the lube required for the correct friction is 9501

 

Do not tighten the floating canon pinion (the one under the hour wheel) - it is supposed to be loose.

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

The floating canon pinion is loose, and I lubricated the offset canon pinion properly, and made sure it was not slipping on the post, however it is losing time like crazy, still. It is registering perfect on the timeographer, but is showing a few minutes lost an hour! I'm at my wit's end. This is the third complete teardown of this movement.  :pulling-hair-out:

Posted

This is a strange one. The symptoms certainly point to slippage, and the prime candidate would be the cannon pinion as previously mentioned.

You say that it was definitely not slipping on the post which is correct, but did you check for slippage between the triangular clutch plate and the outer gear? If that is also OK, it sounds like there must be something binding after the cannon pinion causing the pinion to slip because of the increased drive force required. If this was the case I would have expected that to show up as an issue on the timegrapher.

Posted

I agree with Geo binding or slipping somewhere.

Example I had a Seiko that ran perfect on the timographer but when cased would not run after a lot of fiddling and many post here found that a previous repairer had fitted the wrong crystal & it was binding on the hands. Might be worth looking at these areas hands etc.

Posted

Does it show the time lost on the timegrapher with the hands and dial on, and time properly with them off?

If so, the issue is not with the movement, it's in the fitting of those items.  Here's a few troubleshooting items to look at:

 

1. Check that the dial feet are not bent.  This can cause the dial to seat off-center and rub on either the pinion or the hands.
    Make sure each of the four holes in the dial are perfectly centered around each post for the hands.

2. Check that all hands clear the dial and the other hands ... especially the subsidiary seconds hand ( @ 9 o'clock) is not touching the dial.

3. Check the hands are not contacting the glass.

 

Hope this helps.

  • Like 1
Posted

Timeographer reading is perfect whether dial/hands are on or off. No sub seconds on this movement, however the hour and minute posts are slightly offcenter, not sure how to adjust a 7750 post to center them.

Posted

If the posts are off centre then you might have a re-dial i.e. the dial is not the original & is not exactly the correct fit. If it is not binding on the hands and gives good readings on the Timographer in all positions when cased up I am to be honest at a loss. The fault is happening when the watch is being moved not static which would indicate a balance issue. When you change positions on the Timographer does it settle down quickly or does take awhile before it settles.

Posted

By any chance are the cap jewels in the correct way around i.e. the concave shape should face the balance staff. Just a thought.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My drawings are not to scale, BTW. Here is the FreeCAD illustration of what was printed. It has been very helpful to hold the printed bezel in my hand to get a sense of scale. My plan over the next few days is to get some fender washers. They come in a nearly ideal thickness and and OD that is close to what I want. I will make a precision arbor to hold the washer in my lathe to turn the outside dimension.  Still pondering the best strategy for the inside cut.
    • Thanks Mark, I contacted the seller to see if they have any more info on separating the case.
    • Hi all, I've engaged here a couple of times over the years but never introduced myself. I've been restoring vintage timepieces for 15+ years and focus mostly on 1940s-1980s wristwatches. The farther gone it is, the more I enjoy bringing it back to life. Every now and then I come across something uncommon that I want to share that others my find interesting.  Or sometimes I come across a challenge that I haven't run into before, so I enjoy reaching out to others who I can learn from. Best, g2w
    • Very interesting! I answered the mail from Longines, explaining that I was a bit disappointed and that I wouldn't ask for a costly confirmation for a watch which isn't a high-end one ... and I received another email explaining that they couldn't not certify the authenticity of the watch, but they could specify that, according to the serial number on the caliber and to their handwritten records, the watch was produced in 1938. Great! @Mercurial I will take the measurements and will keep you informed. Thank you all. This forum is incredible 👍
    • Good stuff, thanks!!!  I'm going to save it and re-read your post and watch the video again.  I have a few follow-up question:  My understanding is that the spring vibrates or breathes between the the two regulator pins. When the pins are fully open the effective spring length is from the stud and theoretically no rate adjustment can be made by moving the regulator arm. As the pins are closed the spring gets closer to one side of the regulator block but doesn't touch a pin. You can still move the regulator carrier the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils.  The rate can now be adjusted using the regulator because the effective spring length can be modified.  My question is: Does the hairspring bounce off and touch one of the pins as it breathes? Is that why the effective hairspring length is adjusted by moving the regulator?  And follow-up: How is amplitude affected by the spring between the pins? Does fully open pins, dial up position = max amplitude?  When spring adjusted to 1/2 width still = max amplitude? When I have crown down gravity is pulling the spring against one of the pins and I would expect rate to go up and amplitude to go down. Is that correct?
×
×
  • Create New...