Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm having trouble trying to find a replacement for this old Seiko (1970's I believe?). Can't seem to find any info online about it. Apparently the movement number is 41A, but that also seems to be the movement number for the Grand Seiko Automatic, so I'm quite confused. It has 3 jewels, and takes a 386 battery, if that helps. Thanks!

 

Pics:

 

post-1148-0-18174400-1435088820_thumb.jp

 

post-1148-0-62541300-1435088840_thumb.jp

 

post-1148-0-95133200-1435088861_thumb.jp

Posted

Thanks for the info, Blacklab. So basically it seems that there is no complete movement to replace this one with, I'm assuming? The seconds hand just twitches and won't move, and an overhaul/cleaning of a quartz movement surely wouldn't be worth the time, yeah?

Posted

Give it a go, its always good for practice. If you cant get it to work see if you can find a suitable replacement movement.

Posted

I purchased one of these http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/290865438546?_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT back in April and have kick started a couple of quartz watches with it. When checked with this it indicated that the oscillator was ticking away nicely but the movement wasn't running. This unit can put a burst of energy into the watch that frees off the movement and makes it spin very fast.

The two watches I started with it back in April this way are still running and keeping perfect time. Even if you are not keen on using this technique to start the watch, you can still check that the electronics are OK with it before servicing the movement. This would save wasting time on a watch watch that cannot possibly run, even when cleaned.

  • Like 1
Posted

The seconds hand just twitches and won't move, and an overhaul/cleaning of a quartz movement surely wouldn't be worth the time, yeah?

Interesting question is it worth the time to service/clean the watch? I suppose it depends on how much your time is worth? 

 

So Seiko has a parts list which means the watch can be disassembled. Then at the link below you'll find the Technical guide everything you need to know about servicing this movement.

 

http://www.phfactor.net/wtf/Seiko%20Files/4100A&4110A.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My drawings are not to scale, BTW. Here is the FreeCAD illustration of what was printed. It has been very helpful to hold the printed bezel in my hand to get a sense of scale. My plan over the next few days is to get some fender washers. They come in a nearly ideal thickness and and OD that is close to what I want. I will make a precision arbor to hold the washer in my lathe to turn the outside dimension.  Still pondering the best strategy for the inside cut.
    • Thanks Mark, I contacted the seller to see if they have any more info on separating the case.
    • Hi all, I've engaged here a couple of times over the years but never introduced myself. I've been restoring vintage timepieces for 15+ years and focus mostly on 1940s-1980s wristwatches. The farther gone it is, the more I enjoy bringing it back to life. Every now and then I come across something uncommon that I want to share that others my find interesting.  Or sometimes I come across a challenge that I haven't run into before, so I enjoy reaching out to others who I can learn from. Best, g2w
    • Very interesting! I answered the mail from Longines, explaining that I was a bit disappointed and that I wouldn't ask for a costly confirmation for a watch which isn't a high-end one ... and I received another email explaining that they couldn't not certify the authenticity of the watch, but they could specify that, according to the serial number on the caliber and to their handwritten records, the watch was produced in 1938. Great! @Mercurial I will take the measurements and will keep you informed. Thank you all. This forum is incredible 👍
    • Good stuff, thanks!!!  I'm going to save it and re-read your post and watch the video again.  I have a few follow-up question:  My understanding is that the spring vibrates or breathes between the the two regulator pins. When the pins are fully open the effective spring length is from the stud and theoretically no rate adjustment can be made by moving the regulator arm. As the pins are closed the spring gets closer to one side of the regulator block but doesn't touch a pin. You can still move the regulator carrier the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils.  The rate can now be adjusted using the regulator because the effective spring length can be modified.  My question is: Does the hairspring bounce off and touch one of the pins as it breathes? Is that why the effective hairspring length is adjusted by moving the regulator?  And follow-up: How is amplitude affected by the spring between the pins? Does fully open pins, dial up position = max amplitude?  When spring adjusted to 1/2 width still = max amplitude? When I have crown down gravity is pulling the spring against one of the pins and I would expect rate to go up and amplitude to go down. Is that correct?
×
×
  • Create New...