Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I hate working on ladies watches, but this belonged to my aunt and the family asked me to service it.  She was a wonderful lady, so I made an exception.

All of the train wheels are covered with one plate.  I thought it was going to be a royal pain to assemble, but surprisingly it went together without a hitch.

When I dropped in the balance assembly, it ran really goofy and stopped and when running it was at 28,800.  What was going on.  Geez...the hairspring was sitting on top of the center wheel.  Well...everything is so small...so tight.  Anyway, I made it right and it is running fine.

 

Hamilton2.png

hemilton1.png

  • Like 5
Posted

Ah, one of the about billion ~5x7?"' movements that were made between the 50s-70s. This is a Buren (they had a thing with Hamilton), but Fontainmelon and AS probably made 75% of them. Amazing that they could mass produce such small pieces! Back in the day when trade shops were churning out watch repairs for jewelry stores these little movements were done at about 75% of the price of a regular "men's" watch, insane. Never figured out the reasoning.

 

There were some pretty high grade ones too, from JLC and Zenith in particular. But these small guys rarely run very well. I remember doing one for Cartier, from their dark period in the 70s (AS 1012 movement dressed up a little). Impossible to get better than a 60s delta in 6 positions. With their approval I literally spent a week (I think I may have mentioned this before): changed fork, escape wheel jewels for domed with olive holes, changed balance jewels same, made 2 staffs, pushed the escapement adjustment to the ultra max, polished the fork slot, etc. Still had a 100 degree amplitude drop from horizontal to vertical, terrible delta.

 

Good job getting this one going! With 25 years experience I have dunked the hairspring on these guys a couple of times, always the "last time the balance is going in or coming out". They got repaired, but it was like a day of work. Glad yours didn't get hurt!

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

🤣 That looks about right 😂

 

I was talking to one of the only guys I consider a genius in watchmaking a few years ago and asked for his advice on these little guys. He said, "take the movement out of the case, hands and dial off, and throw it in the trash". Hahaha. He did have some insight: the proportions are all wrong basically. The hairspring collet is huge for the balance size, bringing the hairspring center far from the balance center. Pivots end up large for a given wheel (especially balance). The whole escapement is often about the right size for a 13"' watch, where the old rule of thumb is the escape wheel diameter is around the radius of the balance wheel. On and on. He's right. But they did run, and people were satisfied with them.

 

For him one of the biggest things is the size of the hairspring collet.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I picked up about 100 pieces of assorted ladies movements a while back and about a quarter of them were these design. 

I now use them for donor parts. The hairspring stud screws have come in handy especially. As well as dial feet screws. I think the jewels would come in handy someday. 

My mentor made me practice on them after I became comfortable working on gent's watches. It was a great way to improve on tweezering skills.

Posted
14 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

hairspring was sitting on top of the center wheel

The hardest part of assembling or disassembling these movements is the balance cock: it’s very easy to get the hairspring out of flat when putting or removing the balance cock. If the hairspring gets even slightly out of flat, it will rub against the Center wheel, and cause snow on the timegrapher. Manipulating such a small hairspring is very difficult to get it back flat.

 

13 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Back in the day when trade shops were churning out watch repairs for jewelry stores these little movements were done at about 75% of the price of a regular "men's" watch, insane. Never figured out the reasoning.

The lower price to service ladies movements in the past has always puzzled me as well. If anything, they require more work… Nowadays, if you bring a ladies movement in for servicing at an independent watchmaker, either he will refuse to service it, or charge you a lot more for a ladies movement.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi Mike I did a ships clock a long while ago, not a Hermle though and without getting the beast in my hands to refresh my memory I can’t recall the timing.  This doesn’t help I know but will start the grey matter turning.
    • Of course it will continue Richard.
    • I have stripped and cleaned a Hermle ships clock. It was just oily, no major faults, and I reassembled it, following my photos in reverse order. The time train is fine but the strike train will not play the ships bell strike for half-past. Ships bells play a four hour sequence for the 'watches' and play double 'ding' for the hour and the double dings plus one for the half past (eg half past the second hour is 'ding-ding' 'ding-ding' 'ding'). Sounds complicated but it isn't really. The strike wheel consists of pairs of bumps (for the ding-ding) and no single bumps. There must me some mechanism on the half-past that lifts the strike lever over one of the bumps so only one ding is played. When I get to a half past, it still plays double ding. I have a feeling it is to do with the lever in front of the rack (there is a sprung attachment  on it) and the position of the wheel (to the right) with the two pins that lets that lever fall, but no matter where I place that wheel I cannot get a single ding at half past! Please can someone help with advice on positioning so I can fix this? BTW Happy Easter 🐣 
    • No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup. The watch has a million problems but I have made solid progress. Impulse jewel replaced. Hairspring didn't match the balance (which also doesn't match the serial) but I got it down into range this weekend with 8 or 10 huge timing washers. Replaced the mainspring, balance and train are nice and free. At this point it is running consistently and in beat at about 160°, the third wheel has a bend that sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so. Remaining amplitude problems may be down to the escapement. The banking pins were way out and it didn't run at all before I started. It has one of the old brass escape wheels rather than steel, and I assume the faces its teeth are probably worn or scored in a way I can't yet fix (or see without a microscope). I know this watch is not going to run above 250° but I am going to keep trying to get above 200. But the best part about this watch? Some unscrupulous person stamped "21 JEWELS" on the train bridge sometime in the past, right on top of the Damascening. It's a 15 jewel movement.
    • I think it would rather be the blast of high current drain that would do the damage. But if used occasionally to maybe fix a mainspring or do dial feet it might be worth trying especially if the mainspring or a replacement couldn’t be found.    Tom
×
×
  • Create New...