Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I want to make a stem for a watch as my first attempt at using the lathe which I restored.

My first question: I have a graver (one of these https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/graver-lozenge).  The majority of watch lathe videos I've seen are of people cutting into brass, but stems are typically stainless steel.

There is another graver I saw from Bergeon, specifically marketed as a stem cutting graver (https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/gravers-bergeon-specialist).

Is there some functional difference between the two types of gravers, or would the Vallorbe one also work?

Second question, how do I cut the threads onto the stem.  I've seen those cheapo tap and die sets (https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/0070mm-to-0200mm-indian?code=T20863), but I don't know if those are specifically for screw threads, or is there a separate style for stem threads?

Thanks

Posted (edited)

You'll want to cut the stem from a hardenable steel like O1 or what the Brits call "silver steel", in its annealed/soft state. Your Vallorbe graver will do just fine. The Bergeon stem-specific graver is for cutting the slot. It, and the other one "for balance staffs" are both in tungsten carbide. I imagine they are delivered pretty sharp, but you will absolutely have to sharpen them from time to time, which requires diamond grinding wheels*. You can get another Vallorbe and grind it to a form suitable for cutting slots very easily, and the Vallorbes, being tool steel (HSS I believe) are readily dressed and sharpened on India and Arkansas stones.

 

The threads will be metric and adhere to Swiss watch norms, the threads are the same for screws and stems. Unless of course it's a very old (like 100+ years), but even then the threads are usually close enough to modern that you can cut a metric thread and it will work. American stuff is another story!

 

The Indian screw plate you linked ought to work. It honestly can be much worse than the horrible looking German dies they have listed! I would advise cutting the diameter undersize for the thread, like, for a 1mm thread, cut the steel to 0.90mm. Try threading and see how it looks. You have to use oil, preferably cutting oil. Old and/or cheap threading dies/screw plates often cut a bit and also "form" the thread- you might find that your 0.90mm start diameter has grown to a full 1mm after thread cutting. If the thread is only partially formed, increase to 0.95mm to start, etc., until you get a decent thread.

 

When it's all done (don't forget to file the square!), then you can heat treat it.

 

*I know some folks sharpen carbide gravers on cheap diamond plated plates, but they are really quite rough, even the fine ones. Too rough to produce a finish on the graver that will hold up and cut cleanly in my opinion.

Edited by nickelsilver
Posted

Thank you for the reply.

The widest part of the stem I want to cut is 0.055" (just a hair under 1.4mm)  It's a vintage Timex so it's got no stem tap.  The crown and stem are press fit together and I couldn't separate them, so that's why I plan on making a new one.

I found a few choices for 1/16 inch (1.58mm) rods of medium hardness annealed stainless steel (https://www.mcmaster.com/metals/shape~rod-and-disc/diameter~1-16/tolerance-rating~undersized/).

I'm thinking the Easy-to-Machine 303 version.  Thoughts?

 

Posted

I would avoid stainless at all costs, unless a client specifically demanded it, and then I would triple my normal price, haha. 303 isn't hardenable, and even if listed as "easy to machine" will be 10x harder to work than a regular tool steel like O1. McMaster has plenty of O1 in just about any diameter you can imagine, and it's one of the easiest and most forgiving steels to heat treat. It may be that some modern watches use a hardenable stainless for stems these days, but traditionally they are made from regular carbon steel.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

I would avoid stainless at all costs, unless a client specifically demanded it, and then I would triple my normal price, haha. 303 isn't hardenable, and even if listed as "easy to machine" will be 10x harder to work than a regular tool steel like O1. McMaster has plenty of O1 in just about any diameter you can imagine, and it's one of the easiest and most forgiving steels to heat treat. It may be that some modern watches use a hardenable stainless for stems these days, but traditionally they are made from regular carbon steel.

Is there a specific selection for "O1" steel?  Or should I just stick with carbon steel?

EDIT: I see it, but it's $21 for 6 inches 😕

EDIT 2: I see more inexpensive options, will have to see their full lineup.

Edited by GregG
Posted (edited)

I'm seeing around 3 bucks per 3ft length in sizes around what you're looking for

 

https://www.mcmaster.com/metals/tool-steel-3/tight-tolerance-multipurpose-oil-hardening-o1-tool-steel-rods/

 

It's good to get it a bit oversized from the largest diameter you will end up with; at full stem length you will have a fair bit sticking out of the collet and a general rule is you want about 3x diameter of your material as max stick out. You can go over, but you have to take more care when cutting so it doesn't flex and climb up over your graver. For a typical stem I usually start with 2.5mm or 3mm stock, and end up with a max diameter frequently of 1.2mm or so. You work from the end back, to maintain rigidity.

 

My usual procedure:

-cut pivot to the diameter that the square will be across the flats

-cut the diameter of the square (usually this will be equal to the diameter for the winding pinion)

-file the square. the oversize pivot diameter you cut first acts as a guide for when to stop filing

-finish pivot

-cut diameter for winding pinion

-cut the bearing diameter that rides between the mainplate and barrel bridge

-cut slot

-cut diameter and length for the thread, part off

-flip around and cut thread

 

In some cases it's better to cut the thread first. This depends on the overall stem dimensions and also how freely your die cuts; there can be a lot of torque needed to cut the thread, and you can have a situation where the stem wants to spin in the collet, or if you hold it tightly enough so it doesn't spin you deform the diameter you are holding.

 

Couple of drawings below. For the Valjoux 72 with 0.9 thread I would cut the thread last. On the skinny little AP I'd do it first for sure (also 0.9mm thread).

20221015_093958.jpg

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If at all possible, find a service guide for the automatic movements your work on, because the lubrication procedures may have different requirements or rely on oils you would not use in a manual wind train (in addition to the braking grease you mentioned). Some autos like older Seikos do not have a manual wind option, so the procedure of letting down the mainspring without being able to use the crown may require a screwdriver in the ratchet wheel screw and great care. Do you have an auto movement you were planning to start with?
    • I am an amateur, so there's that. I do not get fixated on amplitude, lift angles, and beat error. However, 4.8ms would bug me if it were my watch. But you must judge your own skills to appreciate the possibility of going backward. I suggest, that you button it up let your friend enjoy the watch for now. As your skills progress, come back to it and correct it. I assume that this watch has a fixed hairspring pin. Some modern watches have an adjustable pin along with adjustable regulator. These are trivial to get in beat. I own a valjoux 726 my dad gave me on my 18th birthday (a looooong time ago). I broke the ratchet wheel with an aggressive wind 4 yrs ago. I have been waiting for my skills to progress before doing a service. I am close. Your advice is well placed and I will apply it.
    • I didn’t find any anomaly to the left of the red mark…reflection? this is the balance in its pivot in the inverted assembly. i can’t see any obvious kinks  and the spring is flat as far as I can see. Either the stud screw is missing, or it’s glued in… I don’t know. I’m loathe to fiddle with it. Any further insights? Thanks!
    • Update!  I've dismantled it, cleaned all the glue off, and rebuilt and lubricated the base movement. I'll leave the chrono part for another day. It's running well - great amplitude and keeping time, but it's got a beat error of 4.8ms.    How important is it to correct this? I'm worried that the potential for making things worse having to take the hairspring off and on repeatedly to adjust this. Would anyone here accept it at that?
    • Since I've been banned from the previous discussion, apparently my language was inappropriate...for small boys. I will start another thread and act in a more decent manner for the girls and ladies of the group.  Please what will happen if the forum can't be managed by the administrator, are there provisions in place to preserve the achived member's questions and answers over the years. Please if I may ask these important questions that are important to the members please.
×
×
  • Create New...