Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello!

I am servicing a nice Omega Speedmaster Automatic ref 375.0083. Like what usually happens on modern chronographs, the post on the chronograph center seconds came off the hand. The watch has an omega 1154 which has the ETA/Valjoux 7750 as a base. I found this hand which I think will fit but I just want to make sure since it's a little costly. 
I will send some pictures of the listing below.

Any advice upon reinstalling the hand by the way? I have worked on very many vintage chronos but very few of this kind. Anything specific I need to keep in mind?

Thanks(:

Screenshot 2022-12-12 at 17.13.32.png

Screenshot 2022-12-12 at 17.13.40.png

Posted

 

15 hours ago, BrehmerR said:

Like what usually happens on modern chronographs, the post on the chronograph center seconds came off the hand.

Many of the watch companies will put the chronograph hands on with lots of force. That's because when you're resetting the zero there's a lot of force on the hands and they want them to stay where there supposed to be. That means they expect when the watches serviced the hands will probably get destroyed and you're supposed to replace all the hands. Of course you're supposed to be a service center with access to all the parts so that becomes a problem for all the rest of us.

15 hours ago, BrehmerR said:

Omega Speedmaster Automatic ref 375.0083

Where did the reference number come from?

Posted
9 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

 

Many of the watch companies will put the chronograph hands on with lots of force. That's because when you're resetting the zero there's a lot of force on the hands and they want them to stay where there supposed to be. That means they expect when the watches serviced the hands will probably get destroyed and you're supposed to replace all the hands. Of course you're supposed to be a service center with access to all the parts so that becomes a problem for all the rest of us.

Where did the reference number come from?

It came from the caseback. It says 375.0083 and 175.0083

Posted
1 hour ago, BrehmerR said:

175.0083

So this number is better where It comes back with a listing of four separate cases. As one of the problems with omega case numbers are there more like a style number that an actual case sort of. So looks like 18 karat gold, gold and stainless steel and two cases and stainless steel. So conceivably the hands will be differing

On 12/12/2022 at 8:14 AM, BrehmerR said:

omega 1154

 Then you claim 1154 movement and your parts listings up above say 1152 and the site I'm on says 1152. Then there's the other weird things the first case number comes back as nothing so it's not even listed. Only the second case numbers listed as I said it's four separate cases. Then it appears to be but I didn't look at every single case that the red hand has a different number than what you have. And if I looked up the number that you have it comes back with nothing even though you have it listed up above which indicates it should be something?

On 12/12/2022 at 8:14 AM, BrehmerR said:

ETA/Valjoux 7750 as a base

Usually with chronograph hands they recommend a special movement holder with support on the back side. You should Be able to look up the 7750 and find a suitable movement holder. The reason why you want to support on the backside is your putting a lot of pressure to get the hand on really tight. Without the support you risk pushing things out that you really don't want to knock out of alignment.

Omega hand not right sort of.JPG

Posted
1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

So this number is better where It comes back with a listing of four separate cases. As one of the problems with omega case numbers are there more like a style number that an actual case sort of. So looks like 18 karat gold, gold and stainless steel and two cases and stainless steel. So conceivably the hands will be differing

 Then you claim 1154 movement and your parts listings up above say 1152 and the site I'm on says 1152. Then there's the other weird things the first case number comes back as nothing so it's not even listed. Only the second case numbers listed as I said it's four separate cases. Then it appears to be but I didn't look at every single case that the red hand has a different number than what you have. And if I looked up the number that you have it comes back with nothing even though you have it listed up above which indicates it should be something?

Usually with chronograph hands they recommend a special movement holder with support on the back side. You should Be able to look up the 7750 and find a suitable movement holder. The reason why you want to support on the backside is your putting a lot of pressure to get the hand on really tight. Without the support you risk pushing things out that you really don't want to knock out of alignment.

Omega hand not right sort of.JPG

What I was able to find was that the 1154 and 1152 both have the 7750 as a base so those hands should be dimensionally interchangeable. The model number for mine is 3513.53. 
I wasn't able to locate a hand REF: 066TP4008. Only a REF: 66TP4008.

What's the difference?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you @Mark. I only became a Patreon subscriber 5 or 6 months ago, but I draw so much value here. If you come up with future contribution or support opportunities, I will be on board.
    • Hi Mike I did a ships clock a long while ago, not a Hermle though and without getting the beast in my hands to refresh my memory I can’t recall the timing.  This doesn’t help I know but will start the grey matter turning.
    • Of course it will continue Richard.
    • I have stripped and cleaned a Hermle ships clock. It was just oily, no major faults, and I reassembled it, following my photos in reverse order. The time train is fine but the strike train will not play the ships bell strike for half-past. Ships bells play a four hour sequence for the 'watches' and play double 'ding' for the hour and the double dings plus one for the half past (eg half past the second hour is 'ding-ding' 'ding-ding' 'ding'). Sounds complicated but it isn't really. The strike wheel consists of pairs of bumps (for the ding-ding) and no single bumps. There must me some mechanism on the half-past that lifts the strike lever over one of the bumps so only one ding is played. When I get to a half past, it still plays double ding. I have a feeling it is to do with the lever in front of the rack (there is a sprung attachment  on it) and the position of the wheel (to the right) with the two pins that lets that lever fall, but no matter where I place that wheel I cannot get a single ding at half past! Please can someone help with advice on positioning so I can fix this? BTW Happy Easter 🐣 
    • No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup. The watch has a million problems but I have made solid progress. Impulse jewel replaced. Hairspring didn't match the balance (which also doesn't match the serial) but I got it down into range this weekend with 8 or 10 huge timing washers. Replaced the mainspring, balance and train are nice and free. At this point it is running consistently and in beat at about 160°, the third wheel has a bend that sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so. Remaining amplitude problems may be down to the escapement. The banking pins were way out and it didn't run at all before I started. It has one of the old brass escape wheels rather than steel, and I assume the faces its teeth are probably worn or scored in a way I can't yet fix (or see without a microscope). I know this watch is not going to run above 250° but I am going to keep trying to get above 200. But the best part about this watch? Some unscrupulous person stamped "21 JEWELS" on the train bridge sometime in the past, right on top of the Damascening. It's a 15 jewel movement.
×
×
  • Create New...