Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

When removing rollers, I've used a cheap version of the Bergeon 2810 Roller Remover (tool on the left in the pic). The edges where about as sharp as a cucumber, so I filed them thinner.

It's worked fine so far. But, I just tried to remove a roller, and the edges can't have been fine enough to get between the roller and staff shoulder - they must have pushed on the balance arms as the rivet broke 😯

I assume with the genuine Bergeon tool, the edges are super fine so as to avoid this ?

I also have another roller removal tool, but the side with the blade fine enough for wristwatches is broken. 

So should I buy the Bergeon 2810, or new blade for the other tool ? - both are exactly the same price!

a.thumb.jpg.fb9a968f6986151cdd52c9599f23d0b0.jpg

Posted

Hi  A member posted about this tool a week or two back and said it did a fair job in removing the roller and the staff so it depends on your own personal choice, and is the tool worth the expenditure and would you get the use out of it and not be another paperweight.

Posted
37 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  A member posted about this tool a week or two back and said it did a fair job in removing the roller and the staff so it depends on your own personal choice, and is the tool worth the expenditure and would you get the use out of it and not be another paperweight.

It's hard to tell the scale. Are the slots small enough for small rollers ?

Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

It's hard to tell the scale. Are the slots small enough for small rollers ?

I am using it with the rollers for the Seiko 1104a (5 3/4 x 6 3/4 ligne Ladies movement).

No issues replacing rollers, balance staffs etc. 

I don’t yet have a staking set or other roller removers so this tool has been quite useful to me. 

Edited by JohnFrum
  • Like 1
  • 2 years later...
Posted (edited)

This thread is quite old but my question seems to match:

What kind of roller removal tool would you guys recommend for small wrist watch balances?

Is the way of grabbing the double roller underneath the safety roller as shown in the Bergeon catalogue right?

 

IMG_7932.jpeg

Edited by Kalanag
Posted
23 minutes ago, Kalanag said:

This thread is quite old but my question seems to match:

What kind of roller removal tool would you guys recommend for small wrist watch balances?

Is the way of grabbing the double roller underneath the upper roller as shown in the Bergeon catalogue right?

 

IMG_7932.jpeg

I haven't seen that diagram before but personally I would say that is not how I would want to hold a double roller. I appears to put the impulse pin at risk. The tool that I use most, and I think I have four different tools that employ the same method but in different ways, is the Bradux you have pictured at the bottom.  They all hook under the roller table not the safety roller, so between the hub and the roller table.

So the Bradux tool, the sides of the V slot are tapered. Often is the case, as the balance is slid up the V, the roller will part from the hub, and there is no need to squeeze the ends of the tool together. Keep focused if you do as there is a real chance of chopping the staff in half,I keep a finger between the two ends when squeezing. 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 12/24/2022 at 7:36 AM, mikepilk said:

they must have pushed on the balance arms as the rivet broke 

I'm pretty sure mine is a genuine and yes I did that once which is why resist using it ever again. Fortunately it's easy enough to get the broken staff out of the roller.

On 12/24/2022 at 7:43 AM, JohnFrum said:

Chinese AliExpress Tool has 4 slots

 

On 12/24/2022 at 10:09 AM, mikepilk said:

It's hard to tell the scale. Are the slots small enough for small rollers ?

Interesting we both have concerns I'm wondering if it work for pocket watches And your concerns whether would work for the smaller ones?

Then I really should read answers from the bottom up as I thought this was a new discussion?

1 hour ago, Kalanag said:

s the way of grabbing the double roller underneath the safety roller as shown in the Bergeon catalogue right?

Then the picture looks wrong if it's a double roller that is one solid piece you should be under the biggest piece because that picture doesn't look quite right at all

even things like American pocket watches were double rollers can be two separate rollers I usually start at the bottom of the biggest one and then when it comes up I can get that to catch the smaller one.

Then the problem with removing rollers depending upon what you work on you can't have enough tools because you never know which one is going to work the best.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I liked and used the Bradux (beware of the cheap Indian copy!!), but now most often I use a tool like this:

IMG_5360.jpeg.bcbc6257aceeccffa9515652bcd6cb03.jpeg

Collet shoulder in headstock, roller in tailstock collet. Slightly spin and pull.

Frank

Edited by praezis
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I have this cheap Chinese version of the Bergeon 2810. It is scrap, as the pictures show!

IMG_1389.jpeg

IMG_1387.jpeg

IMG_1388.jpeg

IMG_1391.jpeg

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 1
Posted

I had the Bergeon 2810 and never had any problem. Mind you back in the 70's and 80's we didn't have Chinese crap around. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Kalanag said:

I have this cheap Chinese version of the Bergeon 2810. It is scrap, as the pictures show!

IMG_1389.jpeg

IMG_1387.jpeg

IMG_1388.jpeg

IMG_1391.jpeg

Absolutely, both the Chinese and Indian copies as Frank suggests, are very poor quality without their intended use considered. 

Posted (edited)

I’ve had watch parts arrive with the cheap version of the 2810 thrown in. Indeed it is of the quality as described. Fortunately the bloke who retired his K&D staking set also bequeathed a lovely Bergeon version of the tool to me in the bottom of the case..🥳

I’m curious if anyone uses the Bergeon 4852 for removal? 

IMG_0601.thumb.jpeg.856c3e8d9db0314640386d06f7b88d35.jpeg

Esslinger describes as a remover?

Edited by rehajm
  • Like 1
Posted

I don't usually work on wrist watches needing balance work, but I have both a genuine Bergeon 2810 and the Indian version and I hate them both. Even the Bergeon does not feel strong enough for American pocket watch rollers and the edges of mine are all banged up. The old style beaver teeth tools or even the ancient K&D stumps that never seem to be quite the right size.

I remember reading somewhere, maybe in de Carle, that American balance staffs were typically of harder steel than Swiss. Maybe that's why my Bergeon tool's blades did not hold up any better than the cheap copy.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, rehajm said:

I’m curious if anyone uses the Bergeon 4852 for removal? …

I‘ve seen Kalle (Youtube) using this kind of tool for roller removal. It makes sense to me.

Edited by Kalanag
  • Thanks 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Kalanag said:

I‘ve seen Kalle (Youtube) using this kind of tool for roller removal. It makes sense to me.

Yes, Kalle 🤨

With just a little bit of bad luck you will turn/remove the staff, not the roller …

Frank

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, praezis said:

…With just a little bit of bad luck you will turn/remove the staff, not the roller …

This thread tells me that there is no generally safe method for removing the roller.

Edited by Kalanag
Posted

I did end up buying the Bergeon 2810 and have had no problems with it. You do have to be careful though. You need to make sure it's seated between the roller and staff shoulder and not pushing on the balance arms. Rollers can be very soft, and too much pressure on the tool can easily bend them.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Kalanag said:

This thread tells me that there is no generally safe method for removing the roller.

I don‘t see that.
Dangerous are all methods that rely on a tight enough rivet of the staff as with 4852.

But watches are too different, from lady‘s to big pocket or B-Uhr watches, there cannot be one for all.

The Bradux is fine with most wrist watches.

There is a reason why I use the lathe. It is a safe method and also works with big PWs.

Frank

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, praezis said:

…There is a reason why I use the lathe. It is a safe method and also works with big PWs…

There it is, the generally safe method! 😄

Posted
6 hours ago, Kalanag said:

This thread tells me that there is no generally safe method for removing the roller.

The Bradux,  it pushes the roller from the hub, the tool does not get near the balance arms, it pushes against the staff not pulls on it  Only caution is to ease the pressure when squeezing and keep index finger inbetween the Bradux arms to limit their travel. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I finally ordered a genuine Bergeon 2810.

Thanks to all of you for your helpful contributions!

Edited by Kalanag
Posted
21 hours ago, praezis said:

With just a little bit of bad luck you will turn/remove the staff, not the roller

…or a time saver if staff replacement is where you’re headed next. You know- one less thing 🥳

  • Haha 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I just tested this Chinese tool (mentioned above by @JohnFrum) and can recommend it for people having a limited tool budget. You can remove/install roller tables and install hair springs.

The quality is decent for around 40 bucks.

IMG_1431.jpeg

IMG_1432.jpeg

IMG_1426.jpeg

IMG_1427.jpeg

IMG_1428.jpeg

IMG_1437.jpeg

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why now Mark ?  And which contact has brought you here ? People have been trying for bloody months to get hold of you for reassurance. Shite way to run a forum tbh. Seven months since you last visited. I think we all need to have a long discussion with you about what happens if anything happens to you. Please look forward to lots of questions. 
    • Hi guys. @VWatchie Those images are self hosted (not hosted on this server). Do a look at the page source and you will see this. I’m afraid, I can’t have control or backup images not hosted on this server. ( They seem to be served from here: https://qehvsw.bn.files.1drv.com/) This server is backed up fully every night and the database is backed up and versioned every hour, all stored off site on Amazon S1 platform. It’s hard for us to lose data. Ive got a huge overhead of space on this particular server the site is served from so no worries there 🙂 Sorry all for lack of response so far, I have been extremely busy and am embarrassed to say that priorities had to be set in place for a while.  Be assured that i’ve got constant monitoring and alerts should the site be in an extended problematic state (down etc) and work on these issues if they arise.
    • Web sites are cheap. Message board are easy. Hosting both is less than 100 usd a year and small advertising would cover most of that.  In the discord group we did some 15 min poc and threw up a couple of different message boards on a domain i host.   The real value is the data / information / hive mind While I'm a rank amateur in watch repair the information and assistance on this board is invaluable. The members on here are friendly, entertaining and a wealth of knowledge This is what needs to be preserved  --Jeff
    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
×
×
  • Create New...