Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been working on a valjoux 7740 chronograph and found quite a few problems with it. Already we are over budget on parts, but that's how it goes sometimes. The barrel was very worn and all the teeth were worn to around half length on another wheel. But now the watch is running fine I just have the Flyback lever to deal with.

 

It is common for flyback levers to break where it is bent down 90ºs in order to engage the reset pusher but unfortunately the flyback lever for the 7740 is obsolete, can't find one on ebay so I thought it would be fun to see what I can do with the broken one.

 

Not sure how this will pan out as I have not finished it yet but in theory this should work. Whenever I think outside the box like this I always try to think of non-destructive ways to execute the job so that it can be reversed easily if required. In this case, I am not modifying the watch movement in any way - just the broken flyback lever - this way, if a flyback lever is ever found in the future then it can be fitted with no problem and my modification discarded.

 

As for recycling - I decided to use an old watch back for the material, because - why not?

 

 

This is where the flyback lever goes...

 

post-1-0-39188200-1436864807_thumb.jpg

 

I softened the original flyback lever and drilled a hole - I am going to rivet an angled piece in order to engage the lever with the pusher.

 

post-1-0-44282800-1436864840_thumb.jpg

 

So I cut a piece out of a watch back :)

 

post-1-0-32975200-1436864912_thumb.jpg

 

Bent it about 90ºs and drilled a hole in it for the rivet.

 

post-1-0-89676900-1436864966_thumb.jpg

 

Turned a rivet on the lathe...

 

post-1-0-58035200-1436865016_thumb.jpg

 

And tried it all for size...

 

post-1-0-81923100-1436865075_thumb.jpg

 

So I now have to re-harden and temper the lever, then rivet the material to it, clean it all up, and give it a test.

 

This may not pan out - but it's fun thinking outside of the box. I will update the thread to let you know wether it worked or not.

 

 

What about you - any "out of the box" repair stories to share?

  • Like 2
Posted

I'm looking forward to seeing the end result already. :). The way things are heading,my out may have to do more of this in the future. :(

Posted

Now this is interesting... your "thinking out of the box" is what I like the most about watch repairing: sometimes parts are just nowhere to be found, and that's the only way you can make an old timepiece come back to life...  :thumbsu:

 

Will keep an eye on this thread to see the outcome, which I already know will be successfull.

Posted

Indeed - hopefully other people will contribute with their out of the box thinking :)

 

It's what keeps the job interesting!

Posted

Yep - £100 would push this job way too much over budget considering what I have spent on it so far

Posted

Well - it turned out OK.

 

Initially my rivet was fouling the screw and the hammer but a bit of whittling sorted it out.

 

Riveted in place...

 

post-1-0-70043800-1436870344_thumb.jpg

 

 

Just a bit of cleanup and it will be fine - functionally it works perfectly.

 

post-1-0-24448900-1436870345_thumb.jpg

 

post-1-0-76653100-1436870345_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hey everyone! I sure this topic has probably been discussed before, but I want some good recommendations based on experience or knowledge about a good affordable high torque DC motor that I can use for my lathe. I have a little lathe but it has the regular old style motor that was used in the past with a foot controller. However, I would like to improve it by buy a nice motor with a speed controller so I don’t have to use my foot. I would like the motor to have really good torque so that even if I run it at a very low speed, it still can cut material easily. I saw online this brand called Servo sewing machine motor with a speed controller, but I don’t know how good they are and if they would work like I would like to for my lathe. Thank you for all the help!
    • Your only partially correct here. Let's look at a magnified view of the image up above. Then for a flat hairspring to function correctly there has to be a little bit of breathing room unfortunately. If you would like Better timekeeping if you get a watch with the over coil hairspring then those regulator pins are supposed to be as tight as possible but still allow the hairspring the slide. With if the pins are opened up at all you'll see a dramatic timing change based on amplitude. So in our example down below initially hairspring is basically free-floating not touching anything the effective length of the hairspring is at the stud. As the amplitude picks up at some point in time they hairspring will just tide should one pin on one swing and the other pin on the other swing. As soon as it does that it changes the effective length to being closer to the regulator pins. As the amplitude picks up more and more it's obviously touching the regulator pins more and more and the length of the hairspring shortens the watch speeds up. This is where in your video at around 16 minutes he opens up the regulator pins and the watch slows down. This is because they hairspring is no longer bouncing off either pin as much. Then because the watches running slow he speeds it up just to show that yes you could regulate the watch but now you have a problem. Because the regulator pins are much farther apart amplitude is going to have a much greater effect. Like in the image down below they hairspring is properly spaced between the pins. But if those pins are farther apart the effect of amplitude will be much greater. So he speeds up the watch to cancel out the effect of the regulator pins at the particular amplitude which was dial down then when he moves the watch to a crown position which will always have an amplitude decrease because the amount of friction on the sides of the pins now the hairspring is not touching the regulator pins as much and the watch dramatically slows down.   Let's look at the other example image. In this particular example they hairspring is actually touching the regulator pin at restWhich means the effective length of the hairspring is at the regulator pin the watch runs fast. As the amplitude picks up hairspring will lift off the PN moving the effective length towards the stud which is why the watches slowing down. As you can see is the amplitude picks up They hairspring is not centered C not getting even timekeeping and the watch is slowing even more down. But at some point in time when the amplitude gets high enough this will depend upon the watch the spacing Excedrin whatever the amplitude is will be balancing actually between the pins in the watch will of course speed up and then at some point time you reach that sweet spot where it's bouncing between the two pins but as you can see it's at a much higher amplitude. So this is why hairspring has to be properly centered between the pins and the pins have to be at the right spacing otherwise you going to get strange timekeeping based on amplitude which no matter what you're going to get a little bit of that as you do have to have a little bit a spacing. At least on a flat hairspring.  
    • My understanding is that In the Etachron system the spring is only centered n order to set the stud angle when the the pins are wide open and the regulator block in at the midway point.  After that the pins are rotated in one direction only so that the width between the spring and one of the studs is 1/2 width of the spring. This results in the spring always being closer to one stud than other one.   
    • The idea is that the spring is centred between the pins when at rest. Then when the watch is running it will oscillate equally between the pins i.e. bounce off one pin then the other, as the hairspring breathes. If the spring is only hitting one pin, then it isn't centred, and most likely the pins are too far apart. Yes, the regulator pins are there to adjust the effective length of the hairspring. The spacing of the regulator pins should not affect the amplitude.  The vertical positions typically have lower amplitude than the horizontal ones. This has nothing to with the regulator - hairspring interaction. Increased friction in the verticals sucks energy from the system and reduces the amplitude. If the amplitude is less, the breathing is less. More tim between the pins = more effective length. Depending on how well the hairspring is centred, and which direction it sags, some vertical positions might run faster than the horizontal ones, and others slower. For example, if the spring is off centre towards on pin, and pressed against it by gravity, it might never bounce off that pin => faster. At the position 180 deg. away, the spring will spend more time in between the pins => slower.
    • Thank you all for the tips and insights. I'm looking carefully at the Sherline lathes with a milling attachment. I need to figure out exactly what I'd need to get in terms of the base lathe and attachments to be able to fabricate basic parts and learn how to fabricate some of the less basic ones- like a cannon pinion. Thank you again.
×
×
  • Create New...