Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This was my grandfather's Waltham, made about 1911. It's a 14K case. The bezel has been bent right (it's been that way for a long time) where one would push the top of the case closed. What this means is the crystal doesn't fit properly so that it be glued down properly. The 14K metal is pretty soft, but I'm reluctant to try to fix it myself since I don't have the tools or experience with this kind of work. If anyone thinks there is a relatively easy fix, please let me know. If not, do you know of a pocket watch case restorer who could tackle something like this? Photos below, and in one it's easy to see the gap between the crystal and the bezel. Thanks! 

Full view, open.jpg

Crystal gap.jpg

Front, closed.jpg

Posted

I think your best bet would be a jewler, preferably one who does custom stuff. Watchmakers are not necessarily clued up on precious metal manipulation.

 

Tom

Posted (edited)

That case has seen very little action, yes?Do you have photos of the movement? Know which model?

Here’s what’s coming soon to me for repair-  owned by a friend who lives in Waltham- once owned by ancestors who worked in the factory…

4B934328-2B9B-4148-A495-9AA92398FDB1.jpeg

94863E70-A166-4B5C-ACB3-465EB884C61E.jpeg

7F161329-7575-4B4A-A599-D7FF9BEBE62F.jpeg

1E750624-CDD4-4ADF-B1B5-1F5C81C58BF7.jpeg

Edited by rehajm
Posted

The case is in very good condition as is the movement, which was professionally serviced about 6 years ago (I was not ready to tackle it at that time). Runs pretty accurately with strong amplitude and low beat error. Here's the info on it:

https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/waltham/18128661

I'll see if there's a jeweler near me who can tackle this. They will have to know how to remove the movement from the case and then re-cement the crystal. Or I suppose I can remove the movement and crystal myself and let the jeweler tackle the bezel. I don't use the watch, just rev it up now and then, so in that sense it truly is an heirloom, but it would be great to get it into tip top shape.

Movement.jpg

Posted
  On 3/24/2023 at 3:49 AM, DanB said:

I'll see if there's a jeweler near me who can tackle this. They will have to know how to remove the movement from the case and then re-cement the crystal.

Expand  

Typically the watchmaker is supposed to remove the watch and any watch related components as jewelers are typically Not watchmakers. Just as watchmakers typically don't do jewelry work.

 

  On 3/23/2023 at 6:37 PM, DanB said:

it's easy to see the gap between the crystal and the bezel.

Expand  

Are you sure that just isn't the result of a poorly fit crystal? Fitting the really thin crystals in these cases can be a interesting thing to do.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An industrial break cleaner , like Holts does a good job of rinsing off paraffin 
    • In cap jewels on several watches I have serviced over the years. I've recently serviced a couple of Longines movements where the cap jewels were colourless. They are a real pain. Without colour they disappear when immersed in any liquid for cleaning 😲 Not necessarily. Cousins do a 10ml bottle for £26 which will last me for years. That's just half the price of a simple Bergeon silicone cushion, so not too expensive 🤣
    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
    • Like these? https://www.watch-tools.de/metal-straps/springbars/assortment-360-strong-spring-bars-beco-inox-o-1-8mm.php  
    • I've seen them on several swiss-made movements as well. Last one was a Tissot if I remember correctly.
×
×
  • Create New...