Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm interested to know when the first watch timing machines were invented and used by the watch manufacturers. I tried Google without much luck. I did find information about a Greiner Chronografic Record on eBay suggesting that it used thermionic valves that would probably date that to pre 1960s. Steve.

Screenshot_20230324-220657.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, steve1811uk said:

Hi, I'm interested to know when the first watch timing machines were invented and used by the watch manufacturers. I tried Google without much luck. I did find information about a Greiner Chronografic Record on eBay suggesting that it used thermionic valves that would probably date that to pre 1960s. Steve.

Screenshot_20230324-220657.png

Interesting question, I'm looking forward to the answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, steve1811uk said:

I'm interested to know when the first watch timing machines were invented and used by the watch manufacturers.

Watch manufacturers Or watch makers? Although conceivably both of watch manufactures and makers were using the same things at the same time.

 to get you started 1934 device that compares a master watch with the watch your timing.

Then in the evolution of timing machines we get into things that move like spinning discs with lights

Then I believe almost simultaneously you end up with two types of paper machines. The paper tape machine that were probably more familiar with and the drum type. Drum type machine has the paper hiding in the drum itself. Also when it's printing you can't tell what it's doing because the drum is spinning minor inconvenience. But I did include image of the drum print out straight  across the watches keeping time angling one direction or the other one is fast one is slow. Then if you are super off in timekeeping it can actually spiral on the drum you use have to keep track of where you are.

Then I have something from the Elgin watch company research Department they were investigating timing machines the drum type in 1943.

 

TH 5.JPG

TH4.JPG

TH33.JPG

TH2.JPG

TH1.JPG

timing paper five.JPG

timing paper for.JPG

timing paper three.JPG

timing paper number two.JPG

timing paper one.JPG

timing paper six.JPG

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Watch manufacturers Or watch makers? Although conceivably both of watch manufactures and makers were using the same things at the same time.

 to get you started 1934 device that compares a master watch with the watch your timing.

Then in the evolution of timing machines we get into things that move like spinning discs with lights

Then I believe almost simultaneously you end up with two types of paper machines. The paper tape machine that were probably more familiar with and the drum type. Drum type machine has the paper hiding in the drum itself. Also when it's printing you can't tell what it's doing because the drum is spinning minor inconvenience. But I did include image of the drum print out straight  across the watches keeping time angling one direction or the other one is fast one is slow. Then if you are super off in timekeeping it can actually spiral on the drum you use have to keep track of where you are.

Then I have something from the Elgin watch company research Department they were investigating timing machines the drum type in 1943.

 

TH 5.JPG

TH4.JPG

TH33.JPG

TH2.JPG

TH1.JPG

timing paper five.JPG

timing paper for.JPG

timing paper three.JPG

timing paper number two.JPG

timing paper one.JPG

timing paper six.JPG

Hi John, that's so interesting and great research. I love the idea of the time balance. That probably pre-dates the quartz crystal oscillator, so in effect the master watch becomes the reference instead. The reason I asked in the first place is that I am currently restoring a LONGINES pocket watch from 1935. It's really well made and has a temperature compensating balance. I wondered how it could be adjusted in positions back then when such a task would be so simple today with a low cost timegrapher. I think static poising, mathematical knowledge and manufacturing accuracy all played a big part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, steve1811uk said:

I wondered how it could be adjusted in positions back then when such a task would be so simple today with a low cost timegrapher. I think static poising, mathematical knowledge and manufacturing accuracy all played a big part.

You'll notice how I came up with the images fast? Long time ago I gave a lecture on timing machines and I started with the history including the question you have here. Somewhere lurking in this computer is a PDF or snipped out a few pages were somebody talked about taking a American pocket watch and bringing it in the time and I believe it took several weeks. But I think even if I could figure out what the title of the book is which I doubt because I have so many PDFs lurking in the computer it would be a bad influence on you.

Okay why is it a bad influence? Because before timing machines existed they would introduce errors they cancel out other errors something that we typically would never think of doing today. Understand that here's other images that Explain that. CS something that we can do with a timing machine relatively quickly although you still have to let the watch run to make sure it really does keep time the timing machine will give you kind of a prediction of yes it should do this but. Oh and I assume you're going to time properly in other words when the watches fully wound up in 24 hours later you still need 24 hours into separate timings of the timing machine to make an adequate prediction of what the watch will do. Then you need to let the watch run for several days to see if it really does keep time. But without the timing machine yes you're probably looking at weeks.

timing old page 2.JPG

timing old page 1.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been recently servicing an Omega 3220A chronograph movement which uses a Dubois Depraz 2000 chrono module.  This has been quite a time consuming project, not necessarily difficult but with lots of steps.  Working on the chrono module is like working on the love child of a hugely complex keyless works and a Timex pin pallet movement. I do have access to a couple of Omega tech sheets and a couple of relevant Youtube videos (including Mark Lovick's Breitling series) so I feel confident that I have all of the required information. The 'tractor' movement (effectively an ETA 2892) had no issues with obtaining 300 degree amplitude dial up / dial down and maybe a spread of 7 seconds across all of the positions.  I serviced the chrono module and when reinstalling it, this brought the amplitude down to about 260 degress with the chrono stopped and 200 with it running.  The Omega specification states that the chrono running should see the amplitude drop by no more than 40 degrees (from, I am guessing, the assembled amplitude i.e. chrono stopped rather than just the bare tractor movement). Obviously this isn't good enough. I am going to have to redo the chrono module again.  Where I suspect I have a problem is inconsistent / over oiling of pivots.  For some reason the Omega technical guide states to apply oil to the bottom pivot of each wheel and then place in the jeweled base plate.  In practice, I managed to smear oil on the horizontal base of the wheel which would be smeared over the outside face of the jewel.  This also wouldn't be helped by dragging the wheel around trying to get the lower pivots to engage in the the jewel.  When I watch Mark service a similar Breitling chrono with DD module, he also oils the bottom pivots and installs the wheels (obviously doing a better job than me!).  My question is, why can't I install the wheels dry and the oil the jewel on the other side of the base plate in the conventional way? The top pivots are oiled through the jewels in the conventional way, so why would the lower pivots be any different? Looking at the those jewels (picture below an example from a different movement) it looks like there isn't an oil well in the outside surface of the jewel around the pivot, so perhaps I would be better applying a drop of oil directly to the jewel hole before installing the wheel?  Perhaps the jewels have different arrangement to conventional jewels because the outside face is installed against the dial side of the tractor movement and we don't want to risk oil migrating from the module to the movement. There are also a couple of friction springs that may have an impact on amplitude, I will recheck their pre-load but these should be OK.  Is there anything else I should look at as a source of friction in the DD module?
    • I found a Trupoise in a flea market box of tools (🇬🇧car boot). I preferred the ‘8’ style tool until the moment I broke my new Omega rivet. The trupoise holds the arms firmly and I’ve become quite efficient… …and I just resorted to bending a balance cock. I needed a tiny bit less shake and it seemed the least risky of the other options. I held it between a stump and a fat stake while I bent the jewel end with my fingers. Honestly I don’t know how anyone would know by visual inspection. 
    • It was about 4 years ago, one was 30, another 35 and 2 others came in joblots that I was after something else. 3 have ruby jewels and one has ceramic bearings.The most I've seen one sell for is £330.  In the uk i still see them sell occasionally for around £70.  I'm not convinced that the Trupoise has low enough friction on the pivots to be as good as a traditional tripod poising tool with unworn ruby jaws.
    • I have a Record 525 which is in a pretty bad way. From what I can see it is based on a cal 650 with an automatic bridge and centre seconds pinion under the rotor retaining stud.  There are additional bearings in the train bridge for the bottom pivots of the automatic works. Of these, on has come out of the bridge completely, one is a bit mangled with an egg shaped pivot hole and one is half in, half out. I've made bearings from scratch on the lathe before, but only for pocket watch pivots (i.e. considerably bigger than these!) and these bearings are either plated or not brass, to match the bride plate, I would guess. I could not find a bridge on eBay so I started digging. I checked new Ranfft site (not help, but the new one seldom is) then the cousins download centre but I could not find a document for a cal 525. I did, however find one for the 650 and, scribbled on the page are the words "= Longines 701". So, obvious next step (or so I thought) would be to check the docs for Longines cal 701 and then see if there is maybe a cal close by, based on that cal with a rotor. I checked, no 701 in the downloads section.  I did find some Longines 701 parts on eBay, which look similar to the 650 (i.e. the train bridge looks to be the same) but I feel I have hit a dead end. I have added some pictures that you may find helpful and I have photographed the entire strip down so I have more, if needed.  I feel I have few options: 1. Close the brewing holes up and reinsert the loose bearings. Close up the pivot hole on the 3rd bearing and hope that does the trick. 2. Make some new bearings (doable but tricky and will look wrong) 3. hold out for a 525 bridge to come up online. I get the feeling this is a rare movement though (all the more a shame it is in such a bad condition) 5. See if there is a Longines equivalent and either use that, or transplant the bearings from that bridge to the Record. Any help identifying the Longines equivalent (if it exists) would be appreciated. Any suggestions on the alternatives I have discussed are also welcome
    • Really you paid that little for a legit Trupoise?
×
×
  • Create New...