Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, alx2021 said:

GR2918DB (same height) and it kicks healthy 300+.

Some watch companies get excited when amplitude goes over 300°.

Then size specifications between Your two mainsprings is interesting.

image.png.21412ef5ddd96daadb1710afff1ab022.png

image.png.fb59924ea5b1ba349af6f74402a5ca16.png

Other than a little bit a difference of length the 2918 is actually lighter in strength.

34 minutes ago, alx2021 said:

Here is a pic of a new GR2946DB. Looks weak to me.

You can't visually look at a mainspring and see if it's week. You can look at a mainspring and see if you like the shape of it but? If you take a blued steel spring out of the barrel and it barely opens up that would look bad. Then today unfortunately mainsprings don't always seem to have a nice desirable shape when they come out of the package. So while yours looks a little bit set if it runs the watch for more than 24 hours watch keeps time you're fine.

For instance below is a picture of two brand-new mainsprings. I definitely would prefer the top one over the bottom but they're what came out of the package and both of them went into watches as far as I know they worked fine. But generally like to see the upper one little bit of that curve if they do their curvature right the mainspring power supposed to be a little more even.

image.png.1eca7d8955bd1264393de39847b873a2.png

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Some watch companies get excited when amplitude goes over 300°.

Then size specifications between Your two mainsprings is interesting.

image.png.21412ef5ddd96daadb1710afff1ab022.png

image.png.fb59924ea5b1ba349af6f74402a5ca16.png

Other than a little bit a difference of length the 2918 is actually lighter in strength.

You can't visually look at a mainspring and see if it's week. You can look at a mainspring and see if you like the shape of it but? If you take a blued steel spring out of the barrel and it barely opens up that would look bad. Then today unfortunately mainsprings don't always seem to have a nice desirable shape when they come out of the package. So while yours looks a little bit set if it runs the watch for more than 24 hours watch keeps time you're fine.

For instance below is a picture of two brand-new mainsprings. I definitely would prefer the top one over the bottom but they're what came out of the package and both of them went into watches as far as I know they worked fine. But generally like to see the upper one little bit of that curve if they do their curvature right the mainspring power supposed to be a little more even.

image.png.1eca7d8955bd1264393de39847b873a2.png

 

 

 

 

It would be nice to think it possible that a mainspring could be reset to its original shape as new then retempered to retain that shape, unset it so to speak. 

https://www.thenakedwatchmaker.com/making-mainsprings#:~:text=The modern mainspring%2C made from,output than was originally developed.

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted
2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

For instance below is a picture of two brand-new mainsprings. I definitely would prefer the top one over the bottom but they're what came out of the package and both of them went into watches as far as I know they worked fine. But generally like to see the upper one little bit of that curve if they do their curvature right the mainspring power supposed to be a little more even.

BTW. I don't have a photo but "weaker" in specs GR2918DB has this end curve. 

Posted
3 hours ago, alx2021 said:

For the record. I have couple Luch with 2209 movement I was working on. I've used new GR2946DB mainsprings from Cousins and couldn't reach any amplitude over 240 with them. Instead I've tried GR2918DB (same height) and it kicks healthy 300+.

Here is a pic of a new GR2946DB. Looks weak to me. I guess I'll be checking new mainsprings for older movements from now on.

 

Looks fine to me

Posted
6 minutes ago, alx2021 said:

BTW. I don't have a photo but "weaker" in specs GR2918DB has this end curve.

The problem with manufacturing is there is no specifications for what the spring should look like.

 

1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

It would be nice to think it possible that a mainspring could be reset to its original shape as new then retempered to retain that shape, unset it so to spea

It would be really nice  if brand-new mainsprings were manufactured to the specifications that we expect. In other words they don't look like they're partially set out of the package they have the proper back curve. Which unfortunately most people don't grasp what the spring looks like as a just somewhat of a package. It's only when you doing watches with the peculiar ends That it is taken out of the ring and contemplate why does it look like crap but it's what I got so it's what I'm going to use.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I understand that in te Etachron system the regulator block is turned anti-clockwise. If I look at the spring in relation to the pins as I turn the block the gap appear to be "closing" and the spring is now closer to one pin than the other.  Closing is not the correct term because the pin gap is always contant but in relation to the spring the gap appears to get smaller and smaller until  the spring is actually on the pin. 
    • I have one of these (different colour scheme) very happy with it! Not so happy with the recent results...  but that is nothing to do with the tester. My wife wanted a waterproof watch she could take on holiday so I fixed up a nice Mickey Mouse Seiko 5 for her.  But after getting a non runner working nicely it failed the pressure test with water seeping in around the crystal 😞 
    • No not baby photos, teens to early 30s. With the bike about 20, graduation about 30.
    • This is wrong. We have been talking about the regulator pins because conventionally the regulator is two pins, or a pin and a boot. The Etachron regulator is one round pin with a wide slot down the middle for the hairspring to sit in. To regulate, the pin is rotated anticlockwise (viewed from above) which brings the rear inner and front outer corners of the slot equally closer to the spring. You can download a document with detailed instructions here: https://calibercorner.com/etachron/ Can you please post some photos to show what you mean by "flatten the spring"?
    • Than you so much for taking the time to write such a detailed and informative post. It really helps. So, another question: With the Etachron system the stud pushes into the carrier but the angle on the vertical plane of the stud is based on the carrier arm. I expected it to be flat but I have seen some movements where it is bent slight down meaning the stud is pointing slightly inward at the bottom and the spring leaving the stud is affected. Is this something that is done at the factory to flatten the spring?  I played around with manipulating the spring vertical angle as it leaves the stud and it has a significant effect on how it goes through the pins and also the angle of the coils on the other side of the balance. I can flatten the spring by adjusting the angle it leaves the stud. Now I know the NH35 is a mass produced movement so not the best quality but is the stud vertical angle ever manipulated to flatten the spring? 
×
×
  • Create New...