Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,
I must admit this first post is more of a camera test.
Your pictures are all so crisp, so I wanted to see how this turned out with my Canon on a tripod. I found it to be a hassle to fiddle around with focus, lighting and positioning everytime I moved the watch, so now my compact camera is charging. I'll try it handheld in macro mode later.

My father once offered me his Omega, but I was too young at the time and my wrist doesn't like Nickel, so that watch passed to my younger brother.
When I finally got old enough that it was OK to admit to the world that I like hats, bairds, the smoking of pipes and pocket watches, he gave me his grandfathers pocket watch.
Although my great grandfather dug for Opals in Australia he never became a rich man. Other than being Swiss, I know very little about this modest watch, which he wore in a nickle-plated paircase to work in the mines after returning to Norway.
It has a cylindre escapement, and I have a few similar "job lot" movements with broken escape wheel teeth, so I've decided not to use this watch at all. (I have a rough and scratched Thommen with a chipped dial and lever escapement that I cleaned up and use daily instead.)
It runs when "pocket warm", and a bath would probably do good, but because of the sentimental value I'm putting that off for later.

IMG_1582_zpsqdadn9gq.jpg

IMG_1584_zps2kgevxmd.jpg


For formal wear, I bought a serviced English pocket watch by Cowderoy of London, 1891. I haven't been able to find much info on this maker.
I've been trying to find a chain for it, but so far no luck.
But it will still be some time until my girlfriend finishes sewing my traditional outfit, so I'm in no rush.

IMG_1585_zps4hriwpob.jpg

More pictures to follow once my camera is charged up.
 

Posted

Well, I had a try with the compact camera and it's awful grainy, so I mounted my SLR back up, this time on a leaning tripod.

I've never had a go with anything smaller than a pocket watch. But my mother-in-law picked up this rather scruffy Orano from the junk bucket at work, so yesterday I popped it open. Literally.
Thanks Mark for the syringe trick on Youtube. ;)
It has a broken crown, so I had to weasle what was left of that out from the back first to get enough airflow.

(The back and the movement says Spera. I don't know the history of these companies, did they merge?)
IMG_1575_zpskoebniqk.jpg


Aside for someone drowning it in thick oil at some point, there were no apparent major issues, so when cleaned it started right up again.
I suspect maybe a problem with an endstone or a balance pivot, because in some positions I can hear it dragging before stopping.
4b416041-a1db-4f16-a9dd-8afc038d459a_zps


My next cleaning project will be even smaller, these two watches I got at a fleamarket for 2£ each.
Both are runners, but only the Junghans runs well. I get a workshop vibe from it's "snagless" design, so I've worn it when woodturning etc. and didn't even notice it was there.
IMG_1588_zpsjnkroptb.jpg
IMG_1589_zpsjcixa8fj.jpg


"Dyrsku'n" is probably the largest fair in Norway, and among many other things it is a mekka for trading knives and watches.
Everyone seems to be collecting Walthams and Elgins at outrageous prices, so I was hopeful for a good deal if I found some keyless English watches.
Sure enough, among a pile of American watches with bloated crowns, this one by "Geo Beifield" stood out.


Some problems were immediately obvious, I could see glue around a too-modern looking crystal, and sure enough when I got home it fell off.
Also the dial is damaged and I'm not too sure about that hour hand.
IMG_1590_zps2jdm2rrh.jpg

The paircase has taken a beating and I suspect more than one straightening over the years, and the clocks bezel hinge looks like a botch job with some brass tube.
Still, I was thrilled it even had a fitting paircase.
IMG_1591_zpsubhrx5mq.jpg

The seller assured me it was a runner, but when I asked him to wind it, it wouldn't start.
So he made an offer of 100£ as-is. Still unsure, I asked him to open it again and had a long, good look inside. Suddenly it started, and I looked up and said "100£, you say? I'll take it."
In retrospect I think he only wound it slightly, I've had no trouble getting it started.
IMG_1592_zpsnxsfkbse.jpg
 

  • Like 1
Posted

Of course I was somewhat influenced by Ebay prices where it seems even broken watches go for over 200£ as long as it's 19th century.
Also local prices are inflated.

 

I never managed to find much comparison, but just now I Googled "Geo Beifield", and presto:
http://www.fellows.co.uk/1088-lot-456-A-Silver-pocket-watch-London-1795-Verge-G?auction_id=89&view=lot_detail

A nicer condition 1795 Beifield hammered at 260£.
Not sure how I compare at the moment, the case itself is decent (I'll snap some more pictures tomorrow) but other than that...mine is supposedly not 18th century if that is some sort of magic treshold. I'll recheck the hallmark.

Posted

You have some interesting pieces Steffen, I particularly like the old verge pocket watch. You say you have doubts about the hour hand, I'm sure it is OK, it is the minute hand that is not original.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Typically watch manufacturing companies will purchase parts to their exact specifications including the jewels. This means that typically you may not find an exact generic replacement. I'm attaching a PDF of a book that explains how to replace jewels. Seitz book.pdf
    • Hey everyone! I sure this topic has probably been discussed before, but I want some good recommendations based on experience or knowledge about a good affordable high torque DC motor that I can use for my lathe. I have a little lathe but it has the regular old style motor that was used in the past with a foot controller. However, I would like to improve it by buy a nice motor with a speed controller so I don’t have to use my foot. I would like the motor to have really good torque so that even if I run it at a very low speed, it still can cut material easily. I saw online this brand called Servo sewing machine motor with a speed controller, but I don’t know how good they are and if they would work like I would like to for my lathe. Thank you for all the help!
    • Your only partially correct here. Let's look at a magnified view of the image up above. Then for a flat hairspring to function correctly there has to be a little bit of breathing room unfortunately. If you would like Better timekeeping if you get a watch with the over coil hairspring then those regulator pins are supposed to be as tight as possible but still allow the hairspring the slide. With if the pins are opened up at all you'll see a dramatic timing change based on amplitude. So in our example down below initially hairspring is basically free-floating not touching anything the effective length of the hairspring is at the stud. As the amplitude picks up at some point in time they hairspring will just tide should one pin on one swing and the other pin on the other swing. As soon as it does that it changes the effective length to being closer to the regulator pins. As the amplitude picks up more and more it's obviously touching the regulator pins more and more and the length of the hairspring shortens the watch speeds up. This is where in your video at around 16 minutes he opens up the regulator pins and the watch slows down. This is because they hairspring is no longer bouncing off either pin as much. Then because the watches running slow he speeds it up just to show that yes you could regulate the watch but now you have a problem. Because the regulator pins are much farther apart amplitude is going to have a much greater effect. Like in the image down below they hairspring is properly spaced between the pins. But if those pins are farther apart the effect of amplitude will be much greater. So he speeds up the watch to cancel out the effect of the regulator pins at the particular amplitude which was dial down then when he moves the watch to a crown position which will always have an amplitude decrease because the amount of friction on the sides of the pins now the hairspring is not touching the regulator pins as much and the watch dramatically slows down.   Let's look at the other example image. In this particular example they hairspring is actually touching the regulator pin at restWhich means the effective length of the hairspring is at the regulator pin the watch runs fast. As the amplitude picks up hairspring will lift off the PN moving the effective length towards the stud which is why the watches slowing down. As you can see is the amplitude picks up They hairspring is not centered C not getting even timekeeping and the watch is slowing even more down. But at some point in time when the amplitude gets high enough this will depend upon the watch the spacing Excedrin whatever the amplitude is will be balancing actually between the pins in the watch will of course speed up and then at some point time you reach that sweet spot where it's bouncing between the two pins but as you can see it's at a much higher amplitude. So this is why hairspring has to be properly centered between the pins and the pins have to be at the right spacing otherwise you going to get strange timekeeping based on amplitude which no matter what you're going to get a little bit of that as you do have to have a little bit a spacing. At least on a flat hairspring.  
    • My understanding is that In the Etachron system the spring is only centered n order to set the stud angle when the the pins are wide open and the regulator block in at the midway point.  After that the pins are rotated in one direction only so that the width between the spring and one of the studs is 1/2 width of the spring. This results in the spring always being closer to one stud than other one.   
    • The idea is that the spring is centred between the pins when at rest. Then when the watch is running it will oscillate equally between the pins i.e. bounce off one pin then the other, as the hairspring breathes. If the spring is only hitting one pin, then it isn't centred, and most likely the pins are too far apart. Yes, the regulator pins are there to adjust the effective length of the hairspring. The spacing of the regulator pins should not affect the amplitude.  The vertical positions typically have lower amplitude than the horizontal ones. This has nothing to with the regulator - hairspring interaction. Increased friction in the verticals sucks energy from the system and reduces the amplitude. If the amplitude is less, the breathing is less. More tim between the pins = more effective length. Depending on how well the hairspring is centred, and which direction it sags, some vertical positions might run faster than the horizontal ones, and others slower. For example, if the spring is off centre towards on pin, and pressed against it by gravity, it might never bounce off that pin => faster. At the position 180 deg. away, the spring will spend more time in between the pins => slower.
×
×
  • Create New...